Phylogeny of the moss family Bryaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology

Systematic Botany

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 471-482

  Pedersen, Niklas ^a,c   Cox, Cymon J ^a   Hedenäs, Lars ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDODONTIUM; ANOMOBRYUM; BRACHYMENIUM; BRACHYMENIUM ACUMINATUM; BRYACEAE; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; BRYUM; BRYUM BILLARDERI; BRYUM CAUCASICUM; HAPLODONTIUM; MIELICHHOFERIA; PLAGIOBRYUM; PTERIDOPHYTA; RHODOBRYUM; ROSULABRYUM;

EID: 0041508608     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ANDREWS, A. L. 1935. Bryaceae. Pp. 184-242 in Moss flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 2, ed. A. J. Grout. Newfane: published by the author.
2. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstructions. Evolution 42: 795-803.
3. BROTHERUS, W. F. 1925. Musci (Laubmosse). 2. Hälfte in Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: Engelmann.
4. BUCK, W. R. and B. GOFFINET. 2000. Morphology and classification of the mosses. Pp. 71-123 in Bryophyte biology, eds. A. J. Shaw and B. Goffinet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. CHIANG, T. I., B. A. SCHAAL, and C-I. PENG. 1998. Universal primers for amplification and sequencing a noncoding spacer between the atpB and rbcL genes of chloroplast DNA. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 39: 245-250.
6. COX, C. J. and T. A. J. HEDDERSON. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119-139.
7. _ and _. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships within the moss family Bryaceae based on chloroplast DNA evidence. Journal of Bryology 25: 31-40.
8. _, B. GOFFINET, A. E. NEWTON, A. J. SHAW, and T. A. J. HEDDERSON. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the diplolepideous-alternate mosses (Bryidae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Bryologist 103: 224-241.
9. CROSBY, M. R., R. E. MAGILL, B. ALLEN, and S. HE. 1999. Checklist of the mosses. Saint Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
10. CRUM, H. 1967. Studies in North American Bryaceae I-II. Bryologist 70: 70-110.
11. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation for small quantities of fresh tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
12. ERIKSSON, T. 1999. AutoDecay. Version 4.0.1. (Hypercardstack available from the author). Stockholm: Botaniska institutionen, Stockholm University.
13. FRITSCH, R. 1991. Index to bryophyte chromosome counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 40: 1-352.
14. GOFFINET, B., C. J. Cox, A. J. SHAW, and T. A. J. HEDDERSON. 2001. The Bryophyta (mosses): systematic and evolutionary inferences from an rps4 gene (cpDNA) phylogeny. Annals of Botany 87: 191-208.
15. HUELSENBECK, J. P. and F. R. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17: 754-755.
16. JORDAN, W. C., M. W. COURTNEY, and J. E. NEIGEL. 1996. Low levels of intraspecific genetic variation at a rapidly evolving chloroplast DNA locus in North American Duckweeds (Lemnaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 430-439.
17. NADOT, S., G. BITTAR, L. CARTER, R. LACROIX, and B. LEJEUNE. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of monocotyledons based on the chloroplast gene rps4, using parsimony and a new numerical phenetics method. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 257-282.
18. NYHOLM, E. 1993. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses. Fasc. 3. Copenhagen and Lund: Nordic Bryological Society.
19. OCHI, H. 1959. A revision of the Bryaceae in Japan and adjacent regions. Tottori: Tottori University.
20. _. 1970. A revision of the subfamily Bryoideae in Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand and the adjacent islands. Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University, Natural Science 21: 7-67.
21. _. 1972. A revision of African Bryoideae, Musci (First Part). Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University, Natural Science 23: 1-126.
22. _. 1992. A revised infrageneric classification of the genus Bryum and related genera (Bryaceae, Musci). Bryobrothera 1: 231-244.
23. _, A. J. SHAW, and H. CRUM. 1994. Bryaceae. Pp. 452-529 in The moss flora of Mexico, eds. A. J. Sharp, H. Crum, and P. M. Eckel. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 69: i-vii, 581-1113, I-XVII.
24. PEDERSEN, N. 2000. A cladistic overview of the Bryaceae (Musci) based on morphological and anatomical data and with emphasis on the genus Bryum. Journal of Bryology 22: 193-206.
25. _ and L. HEDENÄS. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships between Bryum and supposedly closely related genera. Journal of Bryology 24: 277-289.
26. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
27. RAMBAUT, A. 2001. Sequence alignment program (Se-Al) v2.0a5. Oxford: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford.
28. SHAW, A. J. 2000. Molecular phylogeography and cryptic speciation in the mosses, Mielichhoferia elongata and M. mielichhoferiana. Molecular Ecology 9: 595-608.
29. SMITH, A. J. E. 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. SPENCE, J. R. 1987. A proposed reclassification of Bryum, Anomobryum and Brachymenium (Musci, Bryaceae). Journal of Bryology 14: 659-676.
31. _. 1996. Rosulabryum genus novum (Bryaceae). Bryologist 99: 221-225.
32. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP4.0b10. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
33. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, and J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for the amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.