Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: An evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 309-315

  Klocke, Arndt ^a,b   Korbmacher, Heike M ^a   Huck, Lothar G ^c   Ghosh, Joydeep ^c   Kahl Nieke, Bärbel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; HALOGEN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CERAMICS; CHRONOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; INCISOR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGHT; MACHINE; MANDIBLE; NONHUMAN; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PLASMA ARC CURING LIGHT; STRENGTH; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH FRACTURE;

EID: 0041335289     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00310-X     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Oesterle L.J., Messersmith M.L., Devine S.M., Ness C.F. Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod. 29:1995;31-36.
2. Wang W.N., Meng C.L. A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 101:1992;350-354.
3. Lalani N., Foley T.F., Voth R., Banting D., Mamandras A. Polymerization with the argon laser curing time and shear bond strength . Angle Orthod. 70:2000;28-33.
4. Weinberger S.J., Foley T.F., McConnell R.J., Wright G.Z. Bond strengths of two ceramic brackets using argon laser, light, and chemically cured resin systems. Angle Orthod. 67:1997;173-178.
5. Blankenau R.J., Kelsey W.P., Powell G.L., Shearer G.O., Barkmeir W.W., Cavel W.T. Degree of composite resin polymerization with visible light and argon laser. Am J Dent. 4:1991;40-42.
6. Cacciafesta V., Sfondrini M.F., Sfondrini G. A xenon arc light-curing unit for bonding and bleaching. J Clin Orthod. 34:2000;94-96.
7. Oesterle L.J., Newman S.M., Shellhart W.C. Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 119:2001;610-616.
8. Hofmann N., Hugo B., Schubert K., Klaiber B. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Invest. 4:2000;140-147.
9. Ishikawa H., Komori A., Kojima I., Ando F. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 120:2001;58-63.
10. Sfondrini M.F., Cacciafesta V., Pistorio A., Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 119:2001;30-35.
11. Eliades T., Johnston W.M., Eliades G. Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 107:1995;11-19.
12. Douglass J.B. Enamel wear caused by ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 95:1989;96-98.
13. Lindauer S.J., Macon C.R., Browning H., Rubenstein L.K., Isaacson R.J. Ceramic bracket fracture resistance to second-order arch wire activations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 106:1994;481-486.
14. Rhodes R.K., Duncanson M.G., Nanda R.S., Currier G.F. Fracture strengths of ceramic brackets subjected to mesial-distal archwire tipping forces. Angle Orthod. 62:1992;67-76.
15. Matasa C.G. Impact resistance of ceramic brackets according to ophthalmic lenses standards. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 115:1999;158-165.
16. Jeiroudi M.T. Enamel fracture caused by ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 99:1991;97-99.
17. Storm E.R. Debonding ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod. 24:1990;91-94.
18. Bishara S.E., Fehr D.E. Ceramic brackets something old, something new, a review . Semin Orthod. 3:1997;178-188.
19. Strobl K., Bahns T.L., Willham L., Bishara S.E., Stwalley W.C. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 101:1992;152-158.
20. Wool A.L. A better debonding procedure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 102:1992;84-86.
21. Sinha P.K., Nanda R.S. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 112:1997;132-137.
22. Ghafari J. Problems associated with ceramic brackets suggest limiting use to selected teeth. Angle Orthod. 62:1992;145-152.
23. Bishara S.E., Trulove T.S. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 98:1990;145-153.
24. Sinha P.K., Rohrer M.D., Nanda R.S., Brickman C.D. Interlayer formation and its effect on debonding polycrystalline alumina orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 108:1995;455-463.
25. Bishara S.E., Olsen M.E., von Wald L. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 112:1997;552-559.
26. Oesterle L.J., Shellhart W.C., Belanger G.K. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 114:1998;514-519.
27. Nakamichi I., Iwaku M., Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 62:1983;1076-1081.
28. Spitzer D., Ten Bosch J.J. The total luminescence of bovine and human dental enamel. Calcif Tissue Res. 20:1976;201-208.
29. Smith H.Z., Casko J.S., Leinfelder K.F., Utley J.D. Comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths human versus bovine enamel . J Dent Res. 55:1976;B153. abstract 367.
30. Årtun J., Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 85:1984;333-340.
31. Bulman J.S., Osborn J.F. Significance tests. Part 3. Br Dent J. 166:1989;261-264.
32. Sheats R.D., Pankratz V.S. Common statistical tests. Semin Orthod. 8:2002;77-86.
33. Retief D.H. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehab. 1:1974;265-284.
34. Siomka L.V., Powers J.M. In vitro bond strength of treated direct-bonding metal bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 88:1985;133-136.
35. Ødegaard J., Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 94:1988;201-206.
36. Bishara S.E., Olsen M.E., von Wald L., Jakobsen J.R. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 116:1999;86-92.
37. Ferracane J.L. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater. 1:1985;11-14.
38. Peutzfeld A., Sahafi A., Asmussen E. Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater. 16:2000;330-336.
39. Fox N.A., McCabe J.F. An easily removable ceramic bracket? Br J Orthod. 19:1992;305-309.
40. Fox N.A., McCabe J.F., Buckley J.G. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 21:1994;33-43.
41. Eliades T., Brantley W.A. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 22:2000;13-23.
42. Mundstock K.S., Sadowsky P.L., Lacefield W., Bae S. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 116:1999;635-641.