Bond strengths of two ceramic brackets using argon laser, light, and chemically cured resin systems

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 173-178

  Weinberger, Sergio J ^a   Foley, Timothy F ^a   McConnell, Robert J ^a   Wright, Gerald Z ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Argon laser; Bond strength; Ceramic brackets; Resin

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARGON; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMER; PUMICE; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; ENAMEL; GEL; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; LASER; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH FRACTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARGON; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GELS; HUMANS; LASERS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMERS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILANES; SILICATES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 0030632135     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97:121-5.
2. Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberger R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:348-353.
3. Storm E. Debonding ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:91-94.
4. Maskeroni AJ, Meyers CE, Lorton L. Ceramic bonding: A comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;97:168-175.
5. Eliades T, Viazis AD, Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel: Morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;99:369-375.
6. Winchester LJ Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: An in-vitro study. Eur J Ortho 1991; 13:293-305.
7. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1979;2:171-178.
8. Relief DH. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1:265-284.
9. Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ, Powell GL, Barkmeier WW, Cavel WT. Enhancement of physical properties of resin restorative materials by laser polymerization. Lasers Surg Med 1989;9:623-627.
10. Powell GL, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ, Barkmeter WW. The use of an Argon laser for polymerization of composite resin. J Esth Dent 1989;1(1):34-37.
11. Blankenau RJ, Powell GL, Barkmeier WW, Kelsey WP. Argon laser effects on dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1989;68:321 Abstract No. 1117.
12. Sam WH, Chao SY, Chung KH. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with two bonding adhesives. Brit J Orthod 1993; 20:225-29.
13. Bradburn G, Pendu N. An in vitro study of the bond strength of two light-cured composites used in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to molars. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102:418-426.
14. Viazis AD, Cavenaugh G, Bevis RR. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98:214-21.
15. Zachrisson BV, Artun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1979;75:121-137.
16. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 1980;77:269-283.
17. Eliades T, Viazis A, Lekka M. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets banded to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;104:21-26.