Teaching science writing to first graders: Genre learning and recontextualization

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 35-65

  Wollman Bonilla, Julie E ^a  

^a RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040515178     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. (1996). Summary comparison of content between "National science education standards" and "Benchmarks for science literacy" and "Science for all Americans." Washington, D.C.: Author.
2. BAKHTIN, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Ed.; V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University ofTexas Press.
3. BARONE, D. (1999). Resilient children: Stories of poverty, drug exposure, and literacy. Chicago & Newark, DE: National Reading Conference & International Reading Association.
4. BAZERMAN, C. (1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 296-308.
5. BAZERMAN, C. (1998). Emerging perspectives on the many dimensions of scientific discourse. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 15-28). New York: Routledge.
6. BOURDIEU, P., & PASSERON, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. BRITTON, J. (1970). Language and learning. Hammondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
8. CHAPMAN, M. L. (1995). The sociocognitive construction of written genres in first grade. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 164-192.
9. CHRISTIE, F. (1989). Language development in education. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 152-198). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. CHRISTIE, F. (1998). Science and apprenticeship: The pedagogic discourse. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 152-177). New York: Routledge.
11. COOPER, C. R. (1999). What we know about genres, and how it can help us assign and evaluate writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 23-52). Urbana, IL: National Council ofTeachers of English.
12. COPE, B., & KALANTZIS, M. (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13. DELGADO-GAITAN, C. (1990). Literacy for empowerment: The role of parents in children's education. New York: Falmer.
14. EMIG, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.
15. FRANK, L. A. (1992). Writing to be read: Young writers' ability to demonstrate audience awareness when evaluated by their readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 277-298.
16. GEE, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education, 171, 5-25.
17. HALL, N. (1998). Real literacy in a school setting: Five-year-olds take on the world. The Reading Teacher, 52, 8-17.
18. HALLIDAY, M. A. K., & MARTIN, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
19. KAMBERELIS, G. (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403-460.
20. KING, M., & RENTEL, V. (1979). Toward a theory of early writing development. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 243-253.
21. KIRSCH, G., & ROEN, D. H. (Eds.) (1990). A sense of audience in written coininunication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. KRESS, G. (1999). Genre and the changing contexts for English language arts. Language Arts, 76, 461-469.
23. LAVE, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. LEE, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69, 83-115.
25. LEMKE, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. MARTIN, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. MARTIN, J. R. (1993). A contextual theory of language. In Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 116-136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
28. MARTIN, J. R. (1998). Discourses of science: Recontextualisation, genesis, intertexuality and hegemony. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 3-14). New York: Routledge.
29. MARTIN, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: "Genre-based" literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness (pp. 123-155). London: Cassell.
30. MARTIN, J. R., & VEEL, R. (Eds). (1998). Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. New York: Routledge.
31. MARTIN, N., D'ARCY, P., NEWTON, B., & PARKER, R. (1976). Writing and learning across the curriculum 11-16. London: Ward Lock.
32. NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATION AND THE ECONOMY. (1997). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning: Vol. 1. Elementary school. Washington, D.C.: Author
33. PAPPAS, C. C. (1991). Young children's strategies in learning the "book language" of information books. Discourse Processes, 14, 203-225.
34. PAPPAS, C. C., KIEFER, B. Z., & LEVSTIK, L. S. (1995). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school: Theory into action (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
35. PAPPAS, C. C., & PETTEGREW, B. S. (1998). The role of genre in the psycholinguistic guessing game of reading. Language Arts, 75, 36-44.
36. PARATORE, J. R., MELZI, G., & KROL-SINCLAIR, B. (1999). What should we expect of family literacy? Chicago & Newark, DE: National Reading Conference & International Reading Association.
37. QUINT, S. (1994). Schooling homeless children: A working model for America's public schools. New York:Teachers College Press.
38. ROGOFF, B. (1984). Introduction: Thinking and learning in social context. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. ROSE, D. (1998). Science discourse and industrial hierarchy. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 236-265). New York: Routledge.
40. ROTHERY, J. (1989). Learning about language. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (pp. 199-256). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. ROTHERY, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86-123). New York: Longman.
42. RYDER, P. M., VANDER LEI, E. U., & ROEN, D. H. (1999). Audience considerations for evaluating writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 93-113). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
43. SCHLEPPEGRELL, M. J. (1998). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32, 182-211.
44. SOBOL, D. J. (1963). Encyclopedia Brown, boy detective. New York: Bantam.
45. TAYLOR, D., & DORSEY-GAINES, C. (1988). Growing up literate: Learning from inner-city families. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
46. WOLLMAN-BONILLA, J. E. (2000, April). What can family involvement contribute to primary-grade writing instruction? Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.