Recognition of objects and spatial relations in pictures across changes in viewpoint

Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive

Volumn 18, Issue 5-6, 1999, Pages 729-764

  Spetch, Marcia L ^a   Kelly, Debbie M ^a   Reid, Sheri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Landmark based search; Object recognition; Picture processing; Pigeons; Scene recognition; Viewpoint dependence

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039425431     PISSN: 02499185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bayne, K. A. L., & Davis, R. T. (1983). Susceptibility of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to the Ponzo illusion. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 476-478.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
5. Bradshaw, R. H., & Dawkins, M. H. (1993). Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus). Behavioural Processes, 28, 165-172.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
7. Cabe, P. A. (1976). Transfer of discrimination from solid objects to pictures by pigeons: A test of theoretical models of pictorial perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 545-550.
8. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
9. Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeons' analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12, 1-6.
10. Cerella, J. (1990). Pigeon pattern perception: Limits on perspective invariance. Perception, 19, 141-159.
11. Cole, P. D., & Honig, W. K. (1994). Transfer of a discrimination by pigeons (Columbia livia) between pictured locations and the represented environments. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 189-198.
12. Cook, R. G., & Katz, J. S. (1999). Dynamic object perception by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 194-210.
13. Cook, R. G., Wright, A. A., & Kendrick, D. F. (1990). Visual categorization in pigeons. In M. L. Commons, R. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior: Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (pp. 187-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Dawkins, M. S. (1996). Distance and the social recognition in hens: Implications for the use of photographs as social stimuli. Behaviour, 133, 663-680.
15. Dawkins, M. S., Guilford, T., Braithwaite, V. A., & Krebs, J. R. (1996). Discrimination and recognition of photographs of places by homing pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 36, 27-38.
16. D'Eath, R. B. (1998). Can video images imitate real stimuli in animal behaviour experiments? Biological Review, 73, 267-292.
17. Delius, J. D., & Hollard, V. D. (1995). Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 278-290.
18. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
19. Fujita, K., Blough, D. S., & Blough, P. M. (1991). Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion. Animal Learning and Behavior, 19, 283-293.
20. Fujita, K., Blough, D. S., & Blough, P. M. (1993). Effects of the inclination of context lines on perception of the Ponzo illusion by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 21, 29-34.
21. Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1511-1521.
22. Heinrich, B. (1995). Neophilia and exploration in juvenile common ravens, Corvus corax. Animal Behaviour, 50, 695-704.
23. Hershberger, W. (1970). Attached-shadow orientation perceived as depth by chickens reared in an environment illuminated from below. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 73, 407-411.
24. Hollard, V. D., & Delius, J. D. (1982). Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science, 218, 804-806.
25. Humphrey, G. K., & Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 170-190.
26. Jolicoeur, P., & Humphrey, G. K. (In press). Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes. In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Visual constancies: Why things look as they do. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Kanizsa, G., Renzi, P., Conte, S., Compostela, C., & Guerani, L. (1993). Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception, 22, 713-721.
28. Lea, S. E. G., Slater, A. M., & Ryan, C. M. E. (1996). Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 501-504.
29. Lechelt, D. P., & Spetch, M. L. (1997). Pigeons' use of landmarks for spatial search in a laboratory arena and in digitized images of the arena. Learning and Motivation, 28, 424-445.
30. Looney, T. A., & Cohen, P. S. (1974). Pictorial target control of schedule-induced attack in White Carneaux pigeons. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 571-584.
31. Lumsden, E. A. (1970). Implication of the equivalence of mirror-image stimuli for object constancy. Psychonomic Science, 19, 55-56.
32. Lumsden, E. A. (1977). Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 405-407.
33. Lumsden, E. A., & Pullen, M. R. (1970). Object orientation as a dimension of stimulus generalization. Psychonomic Science, 18, 149-150.
34. Morgan, M. J., Fitch, M. D., Holman, J. G., & Lea, S. E. G. (1976). Pigeons learn the concept of 'A'. Perception, 5, 57-66.
35. Osada, Y., & Schiller, P. H. (1994). Can monkeys see objects under conditions of transparency and occlusion? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Supplement, 35, 1664.
36. Poucet, B., Chapuis, N., Durup, M., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (1986). A study of exploratory behavior as an index of spatial knowledge in hamsters. Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 93-100.
37. Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (1995). Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 971-976.
38. Reid, S., & Spetch, M. L. (1999). Perception of pictorial depth cues by pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 698-704.
39. Ryan, C. M. E., & Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behavioural Processes, 33, 155-176.
40. Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 289-294.
41. Sekuler, A. B., Lee, J. A. J., & Shettleworth, S. J. (1996). Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception, 25, 1109-1120.
42. Spetch, M. L. (1995). Overshadowing in landmark learning: Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 166-181.
43. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., & MacDonald, S. E. (1996). Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 55-68.
44. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., MacDonald, S. E., Linkenhoker, B., Kelly, D., & Doerkson, S. (1997). Use of landmark configuration by pigeons and human: II. Generality across search tasks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 14-24.
45. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., & Mondloch, M. V. (1992). Landmark use by pigeons in a touch-screen spatial search task. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 281-292.
46. Spetch, M. L., Kelly, D. M., & Lechelt, D. P. (1998). Encoding of spatial information in images of an outdoor scene by pigeons and humans. Animal Learning and Behavior, 26, 85-102.
47. Spetch, M. L., Friedman, A., & Reid, S. L. (Submitted). The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons and humans.
48. Spetch, M. L., & Wilkie, D. M. (1994). Pigeons' use of landmarks presented in digitized images. Learning and Motivation, 25, 245-275.
49. Shimizu, T. (1998). Conspecific recognition in pigeons (Columba livia) using dynamic video images. Behaviour, 135, 43-53.
50. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
51. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
52. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Zabinski, M., & Blanz, V. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychological Science, 8, 282-289.
53. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Science, 21, 233-282.
54. Timney, B., & Keil, K. (1996). Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Perception, 25, 1121-1128.
55. Towe, A. L. (1954). A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 283-287.
56. Vetter, G. H., & Hearst, E. (1968). Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 753-765.
57. Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221.
58. Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories and pseudocategories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 235-246.
59. Watanabe, S. (1993). Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: An analysis with natural concepts and pseudoconcept discriminations. Behavioural Processes, 30, 225-232.
60. Watanabe, S. (1997). An instance of viewpoint consistency in pigeon object recognition. Behavioural Processes, 39, 215-312.
61. Wilkie, D. M., Willson, R. J., & Kardal, S. (1989). Pigeons discriminate pictures of a geographic location. Animal Learning and Behavior, 17, 163-171.