GroE modulates kinetic partitioning of folding intermediates between alternative states to maximize the yield of biologically active protein

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 268, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 712-723

  Fedorov, Alexey N ^a   Baldwin, Thomas O ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial luciferase; Chaperone; GroELS; Kinetic partitioning; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; LUCIFERASE; MELANOMA GROWTH STIMULATORY ACTIVITY FACTOR; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIMERIZATION; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0031574908     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1007     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Baker D., Agard D. A. Kinetics versus thermodynamics in protein folding. Biochemistry. 33:1994;7505-7509.
2. Baldwin T. O., Ziegler M. M. The biochemistry and molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes. 1992;CRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
3. Baldwin T. O., Ziegler M. M., Chaffotte A. F., Goldberg M. E. Contribution of folding steps involving the individual subunits of bacterial luciferase to the assembly of the active heterodimeric enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;10766-10772.
4. Barraclough R., Ellis R. J. Protein synthesis in chloroplasts. IX. Assembly of newly synthesized large subunits into ribulose biphosphate carboxylase in isolated intact pea chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 608:1980;19-31.
5. Barshop B. A., Wrenn R. F., Frieden C. Analysis of numerical methods for computer simulation of kinetic processes: development of KINSIM - a flexible, portable system. Anal. Biochem. 130:1983;134-145.
6. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
7. Buchner J., Schmidt M., Fuchs M., Jaenicke R., Rudolph R., Schmid F., Kiefhaber T. GroE facilitates refolding of citrase synthase by supressing aggregation. Biochemistry. 30:1991;1586-1591.
8. Burston S. G., Ranson N. A., Clarke A. R. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249:1995;138-152.
9. Chan H. S., Dill K. A. A simple model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 24:1996;345-351.
10. Clark A. C., Sinclair J. F., Baldwin T. O. Folding of bacterial luciferase involves a non-native heterodimeric intermediate in equilibrium with the native enzyme and the unfolded subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;10773-10779.
11. Clark A. C., Hugo E., Frieden C. Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 35:1996;5893-5901.
12. Corrales F., Fersht A. R. Toward a mechanism for GroEL·GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and - pulsed folding and annealing cage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4509-4512.
13. Ellis J. Proteins as molecular chaperones. Nature. 328:1987;378-379.
14. Escher A., Szalay A. GroE mediated folding of bacterial luciferasesin vivo. Mol. Gen. Genet. 238:1993;65-78.
15. Fayet O., Louarn J. M., Georgopoulos C. Suppression of theEscherichia coli dnaA46groESgroEL. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:1986;435-445.
16. Fenton W. A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A. L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
17. Fisher A. J., Raushel F. M., Baldwin T. O., Rayment I. Three-dimensional structure of bacterial luciferase fromVibrio harveyi. Biochemistry. 34:1995;6581-6586.
18. Fisher A. J., Thompson T. B., Thoden J. B., Baldwin T. O., Rayment I. The 1.5 Å resolution crystal structure of bacterial luciferase in low salt conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;21956-21968.
19. Fisher M. T., Yuan X. The rates of commitment to renaturation of rhodanese and glutamine synthetase in the presence of the GroE chaperonins. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;29598-29601.
20. Flynn G., Beckers C., Baase W., Dahlquist F. W. Individual subunits of bacterial luciferase are molten globules and interact with molecular chaperones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;10826-10830.
21. Goloubinoff P., Gatenby A. A., Lorimer G. H. GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign procaryotic ribulose biphosphate carboxylase oligomers inEscherichia coli. Nature. 337:1989;44-47.
22. Gordon C. L., Sather S. K., Casjens S., King J. Selectivein vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;27941-27951.
23. Gray T., Fersht A. R. Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;1197-1207.
24. Gulukota K., Wolynes P. G. Statistical mechanics of kinetic proofreading in protein foldingin vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;9292-9296.
25. Hardy S., Randall L. L. A kinetic partitioning model of selective binding of nonnative proteins by the bacterial chaperone SecB. Science. 251:1991;439-443.
26. Hightower L. E. Cultured animal cells exposed to amino acid analogues or puromycin rapidly synthesize several polypeptides. J. Cell. Physiol. 102:1980;407-427.
27. Huang Z., Prusiner S. B., Cohen F. E. Structure of prion proteins and conformational models for prion deseases. Curr. Topics Microbiol. Immunol. 207:1996;49-67.
28. Hunt J. F., Weaver A. J., Landry S. J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
29. Itzhaki L., Otzen D., Fersht A. R. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 34:1995;14581-14587.
30. Jackson G. S., Staniforth R. A., Halsall D. J., Atkinson T., Holbrook J. J., Clarke A. R., Burston S. G. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 32:1993;2554-2563.
31. Kelly J. W. Alternative conformations of amyloidogenic proteins govern their behavior. Curr. Opinion. Struct. Biol. 6:1996;11-17.
32. King J., Haase-Pettingell C., Robinson A., Speed M., Mitraki A. Thermolabile folding intermediates: inclusion body precursors and chaperonin substrates. FASEB J. 10:1996;57-66.
33. Laminet A., Ziegelhoffer T., Georgopoulos C., Plückthun A. TheEscherichia coli. EMBO J. 9:1990;2315-2319.
34. Landry S. J., Gierasch L. M. The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. Biochemistry. 30:1991;7359-7362.
35. Laskey R. A., Honda B., Mills A., Finch J. T. Nucleosomes are assembled by an acidic protein which binds histones and transfers them to DNA. Nature. 275:1978;416-420.
36. Lilie H., Buchner J. Interaction of GroEL with a highly structured folding intermediate: iterative binding cycles do not involve unfolding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;8100-8104.
37. Lissin N. M., Venyaminov S., Yu, Girshovich A. S. (Mg-ATP)-dependent self-assembly of molecular chaperone GroEL. Nature. 348:1990;339-342.
38. Lorimer G. H. A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein foldingin vivo. FASEB J. 10:1996;5-9.
39. Martin J., Langer T., Boteva R., Schramel A., Horwich A. L., Hartl F. U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a "molten globule"-like intermediate. Nature. 352:1991;36-42.
40. Martin J., Mayhew M., Langer T., Hartl F. U. The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Nature. 366:1993;228-233.
41. Mayhew M., da Silva A. C., Martin J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Hartl F. U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature. 379:1996;420-426.
42. Mendoza J. A., Rogers E., Lorimer G. H., Horowitz P. M. Chaperonins facilitate thein vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1991;13044-13049.
43. Mendoza J., Lorimer G. H., Horowitz P. M. Chaperonin cpn 60 fromEscherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;17631-17634.
44. Murai N., Taguchi H., Yoshida M. Kinetic analysis of interactions between GroEL and reduced α-lactalbumin. J. Biol Chem. 270:1995;19957-19963.
45. Okazaki A., Ikura T., Nikaido K., Kuwajima K. The chaperonin GroEL does not recognize apo-α-lactoalbumin in the molten globule state. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;439-446.
46. Pelham H. R. Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell. 46:1986;959-961.
47. Peralta D., Hartman D. J., Hoogenraad N. J., Hoj P. B. Generation of a stable folding intermediate which can be rescued by the chaperonins GroEL and GroES. FEBS Letters. 339:1994;45-49.
48. Polissi A., Goffin L., Georgopoulos C. TheEscherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 17:1995;159-169.
49. Ranson N. A., Dunster N. J., Burston S. G., Clarke A. R. Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. J. Mol. Biol. 250:1995;581-586.
50. Robinson C. V., Groβ M., Eyles S., Ewbank J. J., Mayhew M., Hartl F. U., Dobson C. M., Radford S. E. Conformation of GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. Nature. 372:1994;646-651.
51. Schmidt M., Buchner J. Interaction of GroE with an all-beta-protein. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;16829-16833.
52. Schmidt M., Buchner J., Todd M. J., Lorimer G. H., Viitanen P. V. On the role of GroES in the chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;10304-10311.
53. Sfatos C. D., Gutin A. M., Abkevich V. I., Shakhnovich E. I. Simulations of chaperone-assisted folding. Biochemistry. 35:1996;334-339.
54. Sinclair J. F., Waddle J. J., Waddill E. F., Baldwin T. O. Purified native subunits of bacterial luciferase are active in the bioluminescence reaction but fail to assemble into the αβ structure. Biochemistry. 32:1993;5036-5044.
55. Sinclair J. F., Ziegler M. M., Baldwin T. O. Kinetic partitioning during protein folding yields multiple native states. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;320-326.
56. Speed M., Wang D., King J. Multimeric intermediates in the pathway to the aggregated inclusion body state for P22 tailspike polypeptide chains. Protein Sci. 4:1995;900-908.
57. Thoden J. B., Holden H. M., Fisher A. J., Sinclair J. F., Wesenberg G., Baldwin T. O., Rayment I. X-ray structure of the β-homodimer of bacterial luciferase fromVibrio harveyi. Protein Sci. 6:1997;13-23.
58. Todd M., Viitanen P., Lorimer G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 265:1994;659-666.
59. Todd M. J., Lorimer G. H., Thirumalai D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4030-4035.
60. Viitanen P. V., Donaldson G. K., Lorimer G. H., Lubben T. H., Gatenby A. A. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry. 30:1991;9716-9723.
61. Viitanen P. V., Gatenby A. A., Lorimer G. H. Purified chaperonin 60 (groEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude ofEscherichia coli. Protein Sci. 1:1992;363-369.
62. Weissman J., Kashi Y., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell. 78:1994;693-702.
63. Weissman J., Hohl C. M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H. R., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 83:1995;577-587.
64. Weissman J., Rye H. S., Fenton W., Beechem J. M., Horwich A. L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:1996;481-490.
65. Zahn R., Plückthun A. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature β-lactamase. J. Mol. Biol. 242:1994;165-174.
66. Zahn R., Spitzfaden C., Ottiger M., Wüthrich K., Plückthun A. Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL. Nature. 368:1994;261-265.
67. Zahn R., Perrett S., Sternberg G., Fersht A. R. Catalysis of amide proton exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Science. 271:1996;642-645.
68. Ziegler M. M., Goldberg M. E., Chaffotte A. F., Baldwin T. O. Refolding of luciferase subunits from urea and assembly of the active heterodimer. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;10760-10765.