Inferring superposition and entanglement in evolving systems from measurements in a single basis

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 523161-523165

  Schelpe, Bella ^a   Kent, Adrian ^a,b   Munro, William ^a   Spiller, Tim ^a  

^a HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAMILTONIANS; OSCILLATIONS; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

TWO-QUBIT SYSTEMS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0038783464     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. D.F.V. James et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001); R.T. Thew et al., ibid. 66, 012303 (2002); U. Leonhardt, Measuring the Quantum State of Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
2. D.F.V. James et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001); R.T. Thew et al., ibid. 66, 012303 (2002); U. Leonhardt, Measuring the Quantum State of Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
3. D.F.V. James et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001); R.T. Thew et al., ibid. 66, 012303 (2002); U. Leonhardt, Measuring the Quantum State of Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
4. Collections of papers on qubit realizations can be found in: S. Braunstein and H.-K. Lo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 9-11 (2000); Experimental Implementation of Quantum Computation, edited by R.G. Clark (Rinton Press, Princeton, 2001).
5. Collections of papers on qubit realizations can be found in: S. Braunstein and H.-K. Lo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 9-11 (2000); Experimental Implementation of Quantum Computation, edited by R.G. Clark (Rinton Press, Princeton, 2001).
6. M. Lewenstein et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2002).
7. O. Guhne et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 062305 (2002).
8. A. Shnirman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2371 (1997).
9. M.F. Bocko et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 7, 3638 (1997).
10. I.E. Mooji et al., Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 285, 1036 (1999).
11. Y. Nakamura et al., Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
12. D. Vion et al., Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 296, 886 (2002).
13. Y. Yu et al., Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 296, 889 (2002).
14. J.M. Martinis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117901 (2002).
15. Yu.A. Pashkin et al., Nature (London) 421, 823 (2003).
16. J.R. Friedman et al., Nature (London) 406, 43 (2000).
17. C.H. van der Wal et al., Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 290, 773 (2000).
18. I. Chiorescu et al., Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 299, 1869 (2003).
19. F.W. Strauch et al., e-print quant-ph/0303002.
20. The charge-phase qubit of Ref. [7] can be biased so that the measurable computational basis states are energy eigenstates (charge superpositions). The Coulomb interaction between two such qubits would provide a swapping interaction between |0〉|1〉 and |1〉|0〉.
21. G. Burkard et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 11 404 (1999).
22. M.J. Lea et al., Fortschr. Phys. 48, 1109 (2000).
23. J.H. Jefferson et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 042328 (2002).
24. See M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), Sec. 9.2.
25. P. Horodecki and A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 127902 (2002); P. Horodecki, e-print quant-ph/0111082.
26. P. Horodecki and A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 127902 (2002); P. Horodecki, e-print quant-ph/0111082.
27. J. Fiurasek, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052315 (2002).