Rabi Oscillations in a Large Josephson-Junction Qubit

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2002, Pages

  Martinis, John M ^a   Nam, S ^a   Aumentado, J ^a   Urbina, C ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b SERVICE DE PHYSIQUE DE L ETAT CONDENSÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; OSCILLATIONS; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; RELAXATION PROCESSES;

DECOUPLING; QUANTUM COMPUTER; QUBIT STATE; RABI OSCILLATION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 45849154713     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117901     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A.J. Leggett, Chance and Matter, edited by J. Souletie, J. Vannimenus, and R. Stora (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987), p.�395.
2. J.M. Martinis, M.H. Devoret, and J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1543 55, 1543 (1985).
3. J. Clarke, A.N. Cleland, M.H. Devoret, D. Esteve, and J.M. Martinis, Science 239, 992 (1988).
4. V. Bouchiat, D. Vion, P. Joyez, D. Esteve, and M.H. Devoret, Phys. Scr. T76, 165 (1998).
5. Y. Nakamura, C.D. Chen, and J.S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2328 79, 2328 (1997).
6. J.R. Friedman, V. Patel, W. Chen, S.K. Tolpygo, and J.E. Lukens, Nature (London)10.1038/35017505 406, 43 (2000).
7. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
8. Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Rev. Mod. Phys.10.1103/RevModPhys.73.357 73, 357 (2001).
9. J.E. Mooij, T.P. Orlando, L. Levitov, L. Tian, C.H. van der Wal, and S. Lloyd, Science10.1126/science.285.5430.1036 285, 1036 (1999).
10. F.C. Wellstood, C. Urbina, and J. Clarke, Appl. Phys. Lett.10.1063/1.98041 50, 772 (1987).
11. G. Zimmerli, T.M. Eiles, R.L. Kautz, and J.M. Martinis, Appl. Phys. Lett.10.1063/1.108195 61, 237 (1992);
12. A.B. Zorin, F.J. Ahlers, J. Niemeyer, T. Weimann, H. Wolf, V.A. Krupenin, and S.V. Lotkhov, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.53.13682 53, 13?682 (1996).
13. Y. Nakamura, Y.A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, and J.S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.047901 88, 047901 (2002).
14. D. Vion, A. Aassime, A. Cottet, P. Joyez, H. Pothier, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M.H. Devoret, Science10.1126/science.1069372 296, 886 (2002).
15. D. Esteve, M.H. Devoret, and J.M. Martinis, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.34.158 34, 158 (1986).
16. J.M. Martinis, M.H. Devoret, and J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.35.4682 35, 4682 (1987).
17. Although here we analyze data from one value of the quantized flux, annealing techniques can reset the flux to only one value. See V. Lefevre-Seguin, E. Turlot, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M.H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5507 46, 5507 (1992).
18. S. Han, Y. Yu, Xi Chu, S. Chu, and Z. Wang, Science10.1126/science.1062266 293, 1457 (2001);
19. Y. Yu, S. Han, X. Chu, S. Chu, and Z. Wang, Science10.1126/science.1069452 296, 889 (2002).