Deconstructing normalisation: Clearing the way for inclusion

Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-78

  Culham, Andrew ^a   Nind, Melanie ^b  

^a City Centre Campus   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; REVIEW; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL LIFE;

EID: 0038708528     PISSN: 13668250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1366825031000086902     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Ainscow, M. (1994). Special needs in the classroom: a teacher education guide. Paris: UNESCO.
2. Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer Press.
3. Allan, J. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. London: Falmer Press.
4. Aspis, S. (1997). Self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: does it have a future? Di"sability and Society, 12, 647-654.
5. Atkinson, D., McCarthy, M., Walmsley, J., Cooper, M., Rolph, S., Aspis, S., Barette, P., Coventry, M., & Ferris, G. (2000). Good times, bad times: women with learning difficulties telling their stories. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
6. Baldwin, S. (1985). Sheep in wolf's clothing: impact of normalisation teaching on human services and service providers. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 8, 131-142.
7. Ballard, K. (1995). Inclusion, paradigms, power and participation. In C. Clark, A. Dyson, & A. Millward (Eds.), Towards inclusive schools? (pp. 1-14). London: David Fulton.
8. Bank-Mikkelson, N. (1980). Denmark. In R. J. Flynn & K. E. Nitsch (Eds.), Normalisation, social integration and community services (pp. 51-70). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
9. Barton, L. (1997). Inclusive education: romantic, subversive or realistic? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1, 231-242.
10. Booth, T. (2000). Inclusion and exclusion policy in England: who controls the agenda? In F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong, & L. Barton (Eds.), Inclusive education: policy, contexts and comparative perspectives (pp. 78-98). London: David Fulton.
11. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (1998). From them to us: an international study of inclusion in education. London: Routledge.
12. Brigham, L., Atkinson, D., Jackson, M., Rolph, S., & Walmsley, J. (2000). Crossing boundaries: change and continuity in the history of learning disability. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
13. Brown, H., & Smith, H. (1989). Whose 'ordinary life' is it anyway? Disability, Handicap and Society, 4, 105-119.
14. Brown, H., & Smith, H. (1992). Normalization: a reader for the nineties. London: Routledge.
15. Campaign for People with Mental Handicaps (CMH). (1981). The principle of normalisation: a foundation for effective services. London: CMH.
16. Carson, S. (1992). Normalization, needs and schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 7, 216-222.
17. Chappell, A. L. (1992). Towards a sociological critique of the normalisation principle. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 35-51.
18. Chappell, A. L. (1994). A question of friendship: community care and the relationships of people with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 9, 419-434.
19. Corbett, J. (1991). So, who wants to be normal? Disability, Handicap and Society, 6, 259-260.
20. Coupe O'Kane, J., Porter, J., & Taylor, A. (1994). Meaningful content and contexts for learning. In J. Coupe O'Kane & B. Smith (Eds.), Taking control: enabling people with learning difficulties (pp. 14-30). London: David Fulton.
21. Culham, A. (2000). Inclusion vs. normalisation: are they compatible in ethos? MA Dissertation, Oxford Brookes University (unpublished).
22. Emerson, E. (1992). What is normalisation? In H. Brown & H. Smith (Eds.), Normalisation: a reader for the nineties (pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
23. Ferri, B. A., & Gregg, N. (1998). Women with disabilities: missing voices. Women's Studies International Forum, 21, 429-439.
24. Florian, L. (1998). Inclusive practice: what, why and how? In C. Tilstone, L. Florian, & R. Rose (Eds.), Promoting inclusive practice (pp. 13-26). London: Routledge.
25. Grunewald, K. (1986). The intellectually handicapped in Sweden - new legislation in a bid for normalisation. Current Sweden, 345, 1-10.
26. Henderson, B. (1996). Inclusion: educating students with and without disabilities. New England Journal of Public Policy, 5, 99-105.
27. Hornby, G. (1999). Inclusion or delusion: can one size fit all? Support for Learning, 14, 152-157.
28. Jenkinson, J. C. (1997). Mainstream or special? Educating students with disabilities. London: Routledge.
29. King's Fund Centre. (1980). An ordinary life: comprehensive locally-based residential services for mentally handicapped people. London: King's Fund Centre.
30. Low, C. (1997). Is inclusivism possible? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 12, 71-79.
31. Mason, M., & Reiser, R. (1990). Disability equality in the classroom: a human rights issue. London: ILEA.
32. Mesibov, G. (1976). Alternatives to the principle of normalisation. Mental Retardation, 16, 30-32.
33. Mittler, P. (2000). Working towards inclusive education: social contexts. London: David Fulton.
34. Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice. London: The Women's Press.
35. Murdoch, H. (1997). Stereotyped behaviours: how should we think about them? British Journal of Special Education, 24, 71-75.
36. Nind, M. (2000). Teachers' understanding of interactive approaches in special education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47, 183-199.
37. Nind, M., & Hewett, D. (1996). When age-appropriateness isn't appropriate. In J. Coupe O'Kane & J. Goldbart (Eds.), Whose choice? Contentious issues for those working with people with learning difficulties (pp. 48-57). London: David Fulton.
38. Nirje, B. (1970). The normalisation principle - implications and comments. Journal of Mental Subnormality, 16, 62-70.
39. Nirje, B. (1976). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In R. B. Kugel & A. Shearer (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded, 2nd edn. (pp. 231-252) Washington, DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation.
40. Nirje, B. (1980). The normalization principle. In R. J. Flynn & K. E. Nitsch (Eds.), Normalization, social integration and community services (pp. 31-49). Baltimore: University Park Press.
41. Nirje, B. (1985). The basis and logic of the normalization principle. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11, 65-68.
42. O'Brien, J. (1985). Normalization training through PASS 3: team leader manual. Decanture, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
43. O'Brien, J., & Lyle, C. (1989). Framework for accomplishments. Decanture, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
44. O'Brien, J., & Tyne, A. (1981). The principle of normalization: a foundation for effective services. London: Campaign For Mentally Handicapped People.
45. O'Hanlon, C. (1995). Inclusive education in Europe. London: David Fulton.
46. O'Toole, B., & McConkey, R. (Eds.) (1995). Innovations in developing countries for people with disabilities. Chorley: Lissieux Hall.
47. Oliver, M. (1993). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
48. Perrin, B., & Nirje, B. (1985). Setting the record straight: a critique of some frequent misconceptions of the normalization principle. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11, 69-74.
49. Peters, S. (1995). Disability baggage: changing the educational research terrain. In P. Clough & L. Barton (Eds.), Making difficulties: research and the construction of SEN (pp. 59-74). London: Paul Chapman.
50. Rapley, M., & Baldwin, S. (1995). Normalisation - metatheory or metaphysicas? A conceptual critique. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 20, 141-157.
51. Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. (1998). Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of being 'intellectually disabled'. Disability and Society, 13, 807-827.
52. Riddell, S. (2000). Inclusion and choice: mutually exclusive principles in special educational needs? In F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong, & L. Barton (Eds.), Inclusive education: policy, contexts and comparative perspectives (pp. 99-116). London: David Fulton.
53. Shaddock, A. J., & Zilber, D. (1991). Current service ideologies and responses to challenging behaviour: social role valorization or vaporization. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17, 169-175.
54. Skrtic, T. M. (1991). Behind special education: a critical analysis of professional culture and school organisation. Denver: Love.
55. Slee, R. (1995). Inclusive education: from policy to school implementation. In C. Clark, A. Dyson, & A. Millward (Eds.), Towards inclusive schools? (pp. 30-41). London: David Fulton.
56. Slee, R. (1996). Inclusive schooling in Australia? Not yet. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 9-32.
57. Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (Eds.) (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
58. Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1996). Inclusion: a guide for educators. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
59. Thomas, G. (1997). Inclusive schools for an inclusive society. British Journal of Special Education, 24, 103-107.
60. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham: Open University.
61. Thomas, G., Walker, D., & Webb, J. (1998). The making of the inclusive school. London: Routledge.
62. Tyne, A. (1989). Normalisation: the next steps. Community Living, 3, 7-8.
63. Tyne, A. (1992). Normalisation: from theory to practice. In H. Brown & H. Smith (Eds.), Normalisation: a reader for the nineties (pp. 35-46). London: Routledge.
64. UNESCO. (1994). World conference on special needs education: access and quality. Paris: UNESCO.
65. Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. (1995). Creating an inclusive school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
66. Walmsley, J. (2001). Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability and Society, 16, 187-205.
67. Williams, L., & Nind, M. (1999). Insiders or outsiders: normalisation and women with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 14, 659-672.
68. Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalisation. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
69. Wolfensberger, W. (1985). The origin and nature of our institutional models. Syracuse: Human Policy Press.
70. Wolfensberger, W. (1980a). The definition of normalisation: Update, problems, disagreements, and misunderstandings. In R. J. Flynn & K. E. Nitsch (Eds.), Normalisation, social integration and community services (pp. 71-115). Baltimore: University Park Press.
71. Wolfensberger, W. (1980b). A brief overview of the principle of normalisation. In R. J. Flynn & K. E. Nitsch (Eds.), Normalisation, social integration and community services (pp. 7-30). Baltimore: University Park Press.
72. Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: a proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234-239.
73. Wolfensberger, W., & Glen, S. (1973a). Program Analysis of Service Systems (PASS), Vol. 1. Handbook, 2nd edn. Toronto: NIMR.
74. Wolfensberger, W., & Glen, S. (1973b). Program Analysis of Service Systems (PASS), Vol. 2. Handbook, 2nd edn. Toronto: NIMR.
75. Wolfensberger, W., & Glen, S. (1975). PASS 3: Program Analysis of Service Systems: a method for the quantitative evaluation of human services. A handbook. Toronto: NIMR.
76. Wolfensberger, W., & Thomas, S. (1983). PASSING: Program Analysis of Service Systems Implementation of Normalisation Goals. Toronto: NIMR.