Yeast Ume6p repressor permits activator binding but restricts TBP binding at the HOP1 promoter

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 3033-3037

  Shimizu, Mitsuhiro ^c   Takahashi, Keiko ^c   Lamb, Teresa M ^a   Shindo, Heisaburo ^b   Mitchell, Aaron P ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Japan)

^c MEISEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE DEACETYLASE; HYBRID PROTEIN; PROTEIN UME6; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TATA BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN; ABF1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CYC1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CYTOCHROME C; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HAP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; HOP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN; UME6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUSION; GENE REPRESSION; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; IN VIVO STUDY; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOOTPRINTING; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SERODIAGNOSIS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN; CYTOCHROME C GROUP; CYTOCHROMES C; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PRECIPITIN TESTS; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); PROTEIN BINDING; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TATA-BOX BINDING PROTEIN; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 0038578035     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg425     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Mitchell,A.P. (1994) Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev., 58, 56-70.
2. Kadosh,D. and Struhl,K. (1997) Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell, 89, 365-371.
3. Kadosh,D. and Struhl,K. (1998) Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev., 12, 797-805.
4. Kadosh,D. and Struhl,K. (1998) Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 5121-5127.
5. Rundlett,S.E., Carmen,A.A., Suka,N., Turner,B.M. and Grunstein,M. (1998) Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature, 392, 831-835.
6. Suka,N., Suka,Y., Carmen,A.A., Wu,J. and Grunstein,M. (2001) Highly specific antibodies determine histone acetylation site usage in yeast heterochromatin and euchromatin. Mol. Cell, 8, 473-479.
7. Deckert,J. and Struhl,K. (2001) Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by specific activators and repressors. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 2726-2735.
8. Goldmark,J.P., Fazzio,T.G., Estep,P.W., Church,G.M. and Tsukiyama,T. (2000) The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p. Cell, 103, 423-433.
9. Kent,N.A. Karabetsou,N., Politis,P.K. and Mellor,J. (2001) In vivo chromatin remodeling by yeast ISWI homologs Iswlp and Isw2p. Genes Dev., 15, 619-626.
10. Fazzio,T.G., Kooperberg,C., Goldmark,J.P., Neal,C., Basom,R., Delrow,J. and Tsukiyama,T. (2001) Widespread collaboration of Isw2 and Sin3-Rpd3 chromatin remodeling complexes in transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 6450-6460.
11. Sewack,G.F., Ellis,T.W. and Hansen,U. (2001) Binding of TATA binding protein to a naturally positioned nucleosome is facilitated by histone acetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 1404-1415.
12. Verdone,L., Wu,J., van Riper,K., Kacherovsky,N., Vogelauer,M., Young,E.T., Grunstein,M., Di Mauro,E. and Caserta,M. (2002) Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions. EMBO J., 21, 1101-1111.
13. Breiling,A., Turner,B.M., Bianchi,M.E. and Orlando,V. (2001) General transcription factors bind promoters repressed by Polycomb group proteins. Nature, 412, 651-655.
14. Sekinger,E.A. and Gross,D.S. (2001) Silenced chromatin is permissive to activator binding and PIC recruitment. Cell, 105, 403-414.
15. Xiao,Y. and Mitchell,A.P. (2000) Shared roles of yeast glycogen synthase kinase 3 family members in nitrogen-responsive phosphorylation of meiotic regulator Ume6p. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 5447-5453.
16. Pfeifer,K., Kim,K.S., Kogan,S. and Guarente,L. (1989) Functional dissection and sequence of yeast HAP1 activator. Cell, 56, 291-301.
17. Schneider,B.L., Seufert,W., Steiner,B., Yang,Q.H. and Futcher,A.B. (1995) Use of polymerase chain reaction epitope tagging for protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 11, 1265-1274.
18. Bowdish,K.S. and Mitchell,A.P. (1993) Bipartite structure of an early meiotic upstream activation sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 2172-2181.
19. Bowdish,K.S., Yuan,H.E. and Mitchell,A.P. (1995) Positive control of yeast meiotic genes by the negative regulator UME6. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 2955-2961.
20. Vershon,A.K., Hollingsworth,N.M. and Johnson,A.D. (1992) Meiotic induction of the yeast HOP1 gene is controlled by positive and negative regulatory sites. Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 3706-3714.
21. Rose,M.D., Winston,F. and Hieter,P. (1990) Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
22. Shimizu,M., Li,W., Covitz,P.A., Hara,M., Shindo,H. and Mitchell,A.P. (1998) Genomic footprinting of the yeast zinc finger protein Rme1p and its roles in repression of the meiotic activator IME1. Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 2329-2336.
23. Shimizu,M., Li,W., Shindo,H. and Mitchell,A.P. (1997) Transcriptional repression at a distance through exclusion of activator binding in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 790-795.
24. Kuo,M.H. and Allis,C.D. (1999) In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment. Methods, 19, 425-433.
25. Kuras,L. and Struhl,K. (1999) Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature, 399, 609-613.
26. Davie,J.K., Trumbly,R.J. and Dent,S.Y.R. (2002) Histone-dependent association of Tup1-Ssn6 with repressed genes in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 693-703.
27. Gailus-Durner,V., Xie,J., Chintamaneni,C. and Vershon,A.K. (1996) Participation of the yeast activator Abf1 in meiosis-specific expression of the HOP1 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 2777-2786.
28. Prinz,S., Klein,F., Auer,H., Schweizer,D. and Primig,M. (1995) A DNA binding factor (UBF) interacts with a positive regulatory element in the promoters of genes expressed during meiosis and vegetative growth in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 3449-3456.
29. Struhl,K. (1998) Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev., 12, 599-606.
30. Grunstein,M. (1997) Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature, 389, 349-352.
31. Imbalzano,A.N., Kwon,H., Green,M.R. and Kingston,R.E. (1994) Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature, 370, 481-485.
32. Workman,J.L. and Kingston,R.E. (1998) Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 545-579.
33. Dudley,A.M., Rougeulle,C. and Winston,F. (1999) The Spt components of SAGA facilitate TBP binding to a promoter at a post-activator-binding step in vivo. Genes Dev., 13, 2940-2945.
34. Belotserkovskaya,R., Sterner,D.E., Deng,M., Sayre,M.H., Lieberman,P.M. and Berger,S.L. (2000) Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 634--647.
35. Li,X.Y., Virbasius,A., Zhu,X. and Green,M.R. (1999) Enhancement of TBP binding by activators and general transcription factors. Nature, 399, 605-609.
36. Chatterjee,S. and Struhl,K. (1995) Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature, 374, 820-822.
37. Klages,N. and Strubin,M. (1995) Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature, 374, 822-823.
38. Xiao,H., Friesen,J.D. and Lis,J.T. (1995) Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 5757-5761.
39. Keaveney,M. and Struhl,K. (1998) Activator-mediated recruitment of the RNA polymerase II machinery is the predominant mechanism for transcriptional activation in yeast. Mol. Cell, 1, 917-924.
40. Deckert,J. and Struhl,K. (2002) Targeted recruitment of Rpd3 histone deacetylase represses transcription by inhibiting recruitment of Swi/Snf, SAGA and TATA binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 6458-6470.