Promoting repeat mammography use: Insights from a systematic needs assessment

Health Education and Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 97-112

  Partin, Melissa R ^a   Slater, Jonathan S ^b  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Health promotion; Mammography; Needs assessment; Utilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GOVERNMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038521357     PISSN: 10901981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1090198102239261     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. American Academy of Family Physicians: Age Charts for Periodic Health Examination. Kansas City, MO, American Academy of Family Physicians, 1994.
2. American Cancer Society: Guidelines for the Cancer-Related Checkup: An Update. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 1993.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: The Obstetrician-Gynecologist and Primary-Preventive Health Care. Washington, DC, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1993.
4. Council on Scientific Affairs AMA: Mammographic screening in asymptomatic women aged 40 years and older. JAMA 261:2535-2542, 1989.
5. Dodd GD: Screening for breast cancer. Cancer 72:1038-1042, 1993.
6. Blackman D: Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1197) - Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 48(SS06):1-22, 2000.
7. Champion VL: Relationship of age to mammography compliance. Cancer 74:329-335, 1994.
8. Miller AM, Champion LC: Mammography in older women: One-time and three-year adherence to guidelines. Nurs Res 45(4):239-245, 1996.
9. Zapka JG, Stoddard A, Maul L, Costanza ME: Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Med Care 29:697-707, 1991.
10. Howe HL: Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age. Am J Prev Med 8:182-185, 1992.
11. Lee JR, Vogel VG: Who uses mammography regularly? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:901-906, 1995.
12. Rosenstock IM: The health belief model and preventive behavior, in Becker M (ed.): The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Thorofare, NJ, Charles B. Slack, 1974, pp. 27-59.
13. Lerman C, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom PF: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 19:279-290, 1990.
14. Marshall G: A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial national breast screening programme appointments. J Public Health Med 16(1):79-86, 1994.
15. Rimer BK, Lerman C, Trock B, King E, Engstrom PF: Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 7:69-74, 1991.
16. Taylor VM, Taplin SH, Urban N, White E, Peacock S: Repeat mammography use among women ages 50-75. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:409-413, 1995.
17. Fava JL, Velicer WF, Prochaska JO: Applying the transtheoretical model to a representative sample of smokers. Addict Behav 20(2): 189-203, 1995.
18. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice 19:276-288, 1982.
19. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 51(3):390-395, 1983.
20. Velicer WF, Norman GJ, Fava JL, Prochaska JO: Testing 40 predictions from the transtheoretical model. Addict Behav 24(4):455-469, 1999.
21. Velicer WF, Hughes SL, Fava JL, Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: An empirical typology of subjects within stage of change. Addict Behav 20(3):299-320, 1995.
22. Reed GR, Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Marcus BH: What makes a good staging algorithm: Examples from regular exercise. Am J Health Promotion 12(1):57-66, 1997.
23. Rakowski W, Anderson MR, Stoddard A, Urban N, Rimer BK, Lane DS, et al: Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol 16(5):433-441, 1997.
24. Rakowski W, Dube CE, Goldstein MG: Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography. Health Educ Res 11(1):77-96, 1996.
25. Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Dube CE, Pearlman DN, Goldstein MG: Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Ann Behav Med 18(2):91-100, 1996.
26. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 47(9):1102-1114, 1992.
27. Rakowski W, Dube CE, Marcus BH, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Abrams DA: Assessing elements of women's decision-making about mammography. Health Psychol 11:111-118, 1992.
28. Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA: Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Rep 108(5):605-624, 1993.
29. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP: Women's decision making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol 12(3):209-214, 1993.
30. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Goldstein MG, Marcus BH, Rakowski W, et al: Stages and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol 13(1):39-46, 1994.
31. Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein MG, Rimer BK, Pearlman DN, Clark MA, et al: Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med 27:748-756, 1998.
32. Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Hunt PN, Lavange LM: SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 7.5. Research Triangle Park, NC, Research Triangle Institute, 1997.
33. Davis TC, Berkel HJ, Arnold CL, Nandy I, Jackson RH, Murphy PW: Intervention to increase mammography utilization in a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 13(4):230-233, 1998.
34. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR, Reynolds KD: Increasing screening mammography in asymptomatic women: Evaluation of a second-generation, theory-based program. Health Psychol 13(6):526-538, 1994.
35. Crane LA, Leakey TA, Ehrsam G, Rimer BK, Warnecke RB: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple calls to promote mammography among low-income women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9(9):923-931, 2000.
36. Flynn BS, Gavin P, Worden JK, Ashikaga T, Gautam S, Carpenter J: Community education programs to promote mammography participation in rural New York state. Prev Med 26:102-108, 1997.
37. Janz NK, Schottenfeld D, Doerr KM, Selig SM, Dunn RL, Strawderman M, et al: A two-step intervention to increase mammography among women aged 65 and older. Am J Public Health 87(10):1683-1686, 1997.
38. Lauver DR, Kane J: A motivational message, external barriers, and mammography utilization. Cancer Detect Prev 23(3):254-264, 1999.
39. Rimer BK, Resch N, King E, Ross E, Lerman C, Boyce A, et al: Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older. Public Health Rep 107(4):369-380, 1992.
40. Saywell RM Jr, Champion VL, Skinner CS, McQuillen D, Martin D, Maraj M: Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening. Prev Med 29(5):374-382, 1999.
41. Sharp DH, Peters TJ, Bartholomew HJ, Shaw A: Breast screening: A randomized controlled trial in UK general practice of three interventions designed to increase uptake. J Epidemiol Community Health 50(1):72-76, 1996.
42. Weber BE, Reilly BM: Enhancing mammography use in the inner city: A randomized trial of intensive case management. Arch Intern Med 157(2):2345-2349, 1997.
43. Pertz CA, DiClemente CC, Carbonari JP: Doing the right thing at the right time? The interaction of stages and processes of change in successful smoking cessation. Health Psychol 15(6):462-468, 1996.
44. Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Ludman E, MacLehos R, Meyer DM, Seger D, et al: Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: A randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):233-242, 2000.
45. Bodiya A, Vorias D, Dickson HA: Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates? Fam Med 31(5):324-326, 1999.
46. Dalessandri KM, Cooper M, Rucker T: Effect of mammography outreach in women veterans. West J Med 169(3):150-152, 1998.
47. Wagner TH: The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: A meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 41(1):64-70, 1998.
48. Simon MS, Gimotty PA, Moncrease A, Dews P, Burack RC: The effect of patient reminders on the use of screening mammography in an urban health department primary care setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 65(1):63-70, 2001.
49. Duan N, Fox SA, Derose KP, Carson S: Maintaining mammography adherence through telephone counseling in a church-based trial. Am J Public Health 90(9):1468-1471, 2000.
50. Champion VL, Skinner CS, Foster JL: The effects of standard care counseling or telephone/in-person counseling on beliefs, knowledge and behavior related to mammography screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 27(10):1565-1571, 2000.
51. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S, Strigo TS: Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med 18(1):1-10, 2000.
52. Ludman EJ, Curry SJ, Meyer D, Taplin SH: Implementation of outreach telephone counseling to promote mammography participation. Health Educ Behav 26(5):689-702, 1999.
53. Rimer BK, Halabi S, Skinner CS, Kaplan EB, Crawford Y, Samsa GP, et al: The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions. Patient Educ Counsel 43(3):271-287, 2001.
54. Skinner C, Strecher V, Hospers H: Physician recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health 84:43-49, 1994.
55. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO: How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 21(290):298, 1999.
56. Orton M, Fitzpatrick R, Fuller A, Mant D, Mlynek C, Thorogood M: Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination. Br J Gen Pract 41:320-323, 1991.
57. Johnson MM, Hislop TG, Kan L, Coldman AJ, Lai A: Compliance with the screening mammography program of British Columbia: Will she return? Can J Public Health 87(3):176-180, 1996.
58. Bastani R, Kaplan CP, Maxwell AE, Nisenbaum R, Pearce J, Marcus AC: Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los Angeles. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:164-167, 1995.
59. Elwood M, McNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M, Doyle TC: Once is enough: Why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme. N Z Med J 111(1066):180-183, 1998.
60. National Cancer Institute: Cancer Facts (NIH Pub. No.016.60). Washington, DC, Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
61. King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P: How valid are mammography self-reports? Am J Public Health 80:1386-1388, 1990.
62. Degnan D, Harris R, Ranney J, Quade D, Earp JA, Gonzales J: Measuring the use of mammography: Two methods compared. Am J Public Health 82(10):1386-1388, 1992.
63. Partin MR, Casey-Paal AL, Slater JS, Korn JE: Measuring mammography compliance: Lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:681-687, 1998.
64. Suarez L, Goldman DA, Weiss NS: Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population. Am J Prev Med 11:94-98, 1995.
65. Paskett ED, Tatum CM, Mack DW, Hoen H, Case LD, Velez R: Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5:721-726, 1996.
66. Etzi S, Lane DS, Grimson R: The use of mammography vans by low-income women: The accuracy of self-reports. Am J Public Health 84:107-109, 1994.
67. Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, Ford LD, Egelhofer J, Cloud M, et al: Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: The accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health 86(1016):1021, 1996.
68. Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI: Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(7):566-570, 1993.
69. Montan DE, Phillips WR: Cancer screening by primary care physicians: A comparison of rates obtained from physician self-report, patient survey, and chart audit. Am J Public Health 85(6):795-800, 1995.
70. Fulton-Kehoe D, Burg MA, Lane D: Are self-reported dates of mammogram accurate? Public Health Rev 20:233-240, 1992.
71. Hiatt RA, Perez-Sable EJ, Quesenberry C, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabogal R, McPhee S: Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white health plan members in Northern California. Prev Med 23(278):285, 1995.
72. Yood MU, McCarthy BD, Lee NC, Jacobsen G, Johnson CC: Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:595-599, 1999.