Compliance with the screening mammography program of British Columbia: Will she return?

Canadian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 176-180

  Johnson, Marcia M ^a   Hislop, T Gregory ^b   Kan, Lisa ^c   Coldman, Andrew J ^b   Lai, Alec ^b  

^a KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

^b BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^c Screening Mammography Prog Brit C   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTALGIA; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; BRITISH COLUMBIA; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 0029789576     PISSN: 00084263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 1996. Toronto: NCIC, 1996.
2. Miller AB. Mammography: Reviewing the evidence. Epidemiology aspect. Can Fam Phys 1993;39:85-90.
3. British Columbia Provincial Health Officer. A report of the health of British Columbians: Provincial Health Officers' Annual Report 1994. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors, 1994; 62.
4. Yarnal KSH, Michener JL, Broadhead WE, Tse CKJ. Increasing compliance with mammography recommendations: Health assessment forms. J Fam Pract 1993;36:59-64.
5. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. 1994/95 Annual Report. Vancouver: SMPBC, 1995; 15.
6. Warren-Burhenne LJ, Hislop TG, Burhenne HJ. The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: Evaluation of the first 15 months. Am J Roentgenology 1992;158:45-49.
7. Kan L, Hislop TG, Skippen DH. Compliance to screening for the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. BCMJ 1991;33:439-41.
8. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Sreening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. Can Med Assoc J 1992;147(10):1477-88.
9. Glanz K, Resch N, Lerman C, et al. Factors associated with adherence to breast cancer screening among working women. JOM 1992;34(11):1071-78.
10. Vernon SW, Laville EA, Jackson GL. Participation in breast screening programs: A review. Soc Sci Med 1990;30(10):1107-18.
11. Rutter DR, Calnan M, Vaile MSB, et al. Discomfort and pain during mammography: Description, prediction and prevention. Br Med J 1992;305:443-45.
12. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol 1994;13:122-29.
13. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, et al. Increasing screening mammography in asymptomatic women: Evaluation of a second generation, theory-based, program. Health Psychol 1994;32:118-29.
14. Champion VL. Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening. Cancer Detect Prev 1992;16:253-58.
15. Champion VL. Strategies to increase mammography utilization. Med Care 1994;32:118-29.
16. Champion V. Relationship of age to mammography compliance. Cancer 1994;74(1 Suppl):329-35.
17. Kurtz ME, Given B, Given CW, Kurtz JC. Relationships of barriers and facilitators to breast self-examination, mammography and clinical breast examination in a worksite population. Cancer Nurs 1993;16:251-59.
18. Margolis KL, Lurien N, McGovern PG, Slater JS Predictors of failure to attend scheduled mammography appointments at a public teaching hospital. J Gen Int Med 1993;8:602-5.
19. Mohler PJ. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: A clinial trial in a primary care office. Fam Med 1995;27:117-21.
20. Vogel VG, Bondy M, Halabi S, et al. The Texas Breast Screening Project: Part II. Demographics, risk profiles, and health practices of participants. South Med J 1993;86:391-96.
21. Bryant H, Mah Z. Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviours of rural and urban women. Prev Med 1992;21:405-18.
22. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, et al. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 1990;19:279-90.
23. Beaulieu MD, Ray D, Beland F, et al. Breast cancer screening: Is family medicine intervention effective? [French] Union Médicale du Canada 1994;123:154-62.
24. Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Int Med 1991;151:50-56.
25. Orton M, Fitzpatrick R, Fuller A, et al. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination. Br J Gen Pract 1991;41:320-23.
26. Marshall G. A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments. J Public Health Med 1994;16:79-86.
27. Schapira DV, Kumart NB, Clark RA, Yag C. Mammography screening credit card and compliance. Cancer 1992;70:509-12.
28. Howe HL. Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age. Am J Prev Med 1992;8:182-85.
29. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women 50 years and older - behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1992. MMWR 1992;42:737-41.
30. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1074-80.
31. deWaard F, Collette HJA, Rombach JJ, et al. The DOM Project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J Chron Dis 1984;37:1-44.