Differences in vulnerability and susceptibility to dexamphetamine in Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: A dose-effect analysis of spatio-temporal programming of behaviour

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 181-187

  Cools, A R ^a   Ellenbroek, B A ^a   Gingras, M A ^a   Engbersen, A ^a   Heeren, D ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Individual differences; Locomotor activity; Novelty

Indexed keywords

APOMORPHINE; DEXAMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG SENSITIVITY; GENOTYPE; LETHALITY; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0030791924     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050334     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Antelman SM, Eichler AJ, Black k C, Kocan D (1980) Interchangeability of stress and amphetamine in sensitization. Science 207: 329-331
2. Coenders CJH, Kerbusch SML, Vossen JMH, Cools AR (1992) Problem-solving behaviour in apomorphine-susceptible and unsusceptible rats. Physiol Behav 52: 321-326
3. Cools AR, Peeters BWMM (1992) Differences in spike-wave discharges in two rat selection lines characterized by opposite dopaminergic activities. Neurosci Lett 134: 253-256
4. Cools AR, Brachten R, Heeren D, Willemen A, Ellenbroek B (1990) Search after neurobiological profile of individual-specific features of Wistar rats. Brain Res Bull 24: 49-69
5. Cools AR, Dierx J, Cocnders C, Heeren D, Jenks BG, Ellenbroek B (1993a) Apomorphine-susceptible and apomorphine-unsusceptible Wistar rats differ in novelty-induced changes in hippocampal dynorphin B expression and two-way active avoidance: a new key in the search for the role of the hippocampalaccumbens axis. Behav Brain Res 55: 213-221
6. Cools AR, Ellenbroek, B, Heeren D, Lubbers L (1993b) Use of high and low responders to novelty in rat studies on the role of the ventral striatum in radial maze performance: effects of intra-accumbens injections of sulpiride. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 71: 335-342
7. Cools AR, Rots NY, Ellenbroek B, de Kloet ER (1993c) Bimodal shape of individual variation in behavior of Wistar rats: the overall outcome of a fundamentally different make-up and reactivity of the brain, the endocrinological and the immunological system. Neuropsychobiology 28: 100-105
8. Cools AR, Rots NY, de Kloet ER, Ellenbroek B (1994) Apomorphine-susceptible and apomorphine-unsusceptible Wistar rats: a new tool in the search for the function of the striatum in switching behavioural strategies. In: Percheron G, et al. (eds) The basal ganglia. Plenum Press, New York, pp 507-515
9. Eilam D, Golani I (1990) Home base behavior in amphetaminetreated tame wild rats (Ruttus norvegicus). Behav Brain Res 36: 161-170
10. Ellenbroek BA, Cools AR (1993) Apomorphine susceptible and apomorphine unsusceptible rats differ in the amphetamine induced sensitization of α-receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Soc Neurosci Abstr 19: 823
11. Ellenbroek BA, Geyer MA, Cools AR (1995) The behavior of aposus rats in animal models with construct validity for schizophrenia. J Neurosci 15: 7604-7611
12. Exner M, Clark D (1993) Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multi-variate approach. Behav Pharmacol 4: 47-56
13. Gingras MA, Cools AR (1994) Evidence that high and low responders to novelty show differences in behavioral responses to dexamphetamine. Soc Neurosci Abstr 20: 1031
14. Gingras MA, Cools AR (1995) Differential ethanol intake in high and low responders to novelty. Behav Pharmacol 6: 718-723
15. Gingras MA, Cools AR (1996a) No major differences in locomotor responses to dexamphetamine in high and low responders to novelty: a study in Wistar rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (in press)
16. Gingras MA, Cools AR (1996b) Analysis of the biphasic locomotor response to ethanol in high and low responders to novelty: a study in Nijmegen Wistar rats. Psychopharmacology 125: 258-264
17. Golani I, Benjamini Y, Eilam D (1993) Stopping behavior: constraints on exploration in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Behav Brain Res 53: 21-33
18. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neil DB, Justice JB Jr (1991) Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 41: 203-210
19. Lyon M, Robbins TW (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. Curr Dev Psychopharmacol 2: 79-163
20. Mulders WHAM, Meek J, Hafmans TGM, Cools AR (1995a) The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in two types of Wistar rats with different stress responses. I. Morphometric comparison. Brain Res 689: 47-60
21. Mulders WHAM, Meek J, Schmidt ED, Hafmans TGM, Cools AR (1995b) The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in two types of Wistar rats with different stress responses. II. Differential fos-expression. Brain Res 689: 61-70
22. Piazza PV, Deminière JM, le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511-1513
23. Piazza PV, Deminière JM, Maccari S, le Moal M, Mormède P, Simon H (1991) Individual vulnerability to drug self-administration: action of corticosterone on dopaminergic systems as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. In: Willner P. Scheel-Krüger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, pp 473-495
24. Robbins TW, Sahkian BJ (1981) Behavioural and neurochemical determinants of drug-induced stereotypy. In: Rose FC (ed) Metabolic disorders of the nervous system. Pitman. London, pp 244-291
25. Roozendaal B, Cools AR (1994) Influence of the noradrenergic state of the nucleus accumbens in basolateral amygdala mediated changes in neophobia in rats. Behav Neurosci 108: 1107-1118
26. Rots NY (1995) Dopamine and stress; studies with genetically selected rat lines. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
27. Rots NY, Cools AR, De Jong J, De Kloet ER (1995) Corticosteroid feedback resistance in rats genetically selected for increased dopamine responsiveness. J Neuroendocrinol 7: 153-160
28. Rots NY, Cools AR, Oizl MS, De Jong J, Sutanto W, De Kloet ER (1996a) Divergent prolactin and pituitary-adrenal activity in rats selectively bred for different dopamine responsiveness. Endocrinology 137: 1678-1686
29. Rots NY, Workel J, Oizl MS, Berod A, Rostene W, Cools AR, De Kloet ER (1996b) Development of divergence in dopamine responsiveness in genetically selected rat lines is preceded by changes in pituitary-adrenal activity. Dev Brain Res 92: 164-171
30. 2-receptor binding sites in nigrostriatal and tuberoinfundibular systems. Brain Res 710: 189-196