Valence competition in the spatial stochastic model

Journal of Theoretical Politics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 371-383

  Schofield, Norman ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Activists; Equilibrium; Valence

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038321701     PISSN: 09516298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/09516298030154001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aldrich, John (1983a) 'A Spatial Model with Party Activists: Implications for Electoral Dynamics', Public Choice 41: 63-100.
2. Aldrich, John (1983b) 'A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activists', American Political Science Review 77(3): 974-90.
3. Ansolabehere, Stephen and James Snyder (2000) 'Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models', Public Choice 103: 327-36.
4. Enelow, James and Melvin Hinich (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Fan, Ky (1961) 'A Generalization of Tychonoff's Fixed Point Theorem', Mathematische Annalen 42: 305-10.
6. Groseclose, Timothy (2001) 'A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has Valence Advantage', American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 862-86.
7. Hinich, Melvin (1977) 'Equilibrium in Spatial Voting: The Median Voter Result Is An Artifact', Journal of Economic Theory 16(2): 208-19.
8. Lin, Tse-Min, James Enelow and Han Dorussen (1999) 'Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting', Public Choice 98: 59-82.
9. Miller, Gary and Norman Schofleld (2002) 'Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States', American Political Science Review 97(2): 245-60.
10. Poole, Keith and Howard Rosenthal (1984) 'US Presidential Elections 1968-1980: A Spatial Analysis', American Journal of Political Science 28(2): 283-312.
11. Schofield, Norman (2003a) 'Equilibrium in the Spatial Valence Model of Elections', Typescript. Washington University in Saint Louis.
12. Schofield, Norman (2003b) 'Power, Prosperity and Social Choice', Social Choice and Welfare 20(1): 85-118.
13. Schofield, Norman (2003c) The Probability of a Fit Choice: US Political History and Voting Theory', Typescript. Washington University in Saint Louis.
14. Schofield, Norman, Andrew Martin, Kevin Quinn and Andrew Whitford (1998) 'Multiparty Competition in The Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit', Public Choice 97: 257-93.
15. Schofleld, Norman, Gary Miller and Andrew Martin (2003) 'Critical Elections and Political Realignments in the US: 1860-2000', Political Studies 51(2): 217-40.
16. Schofield, Norman and Itai Sened (2003) 'The Myth of the Political Centre: Modelling the Interaction of Parties, Activists and Voters', Typescript. Washington University in Saint Louis.