A within-subjects, within-task demonstration of intact spatial reference memory and impaired spatial working memory in glutamate receptor-A-deficient mice

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 3953-3958

  Schmitt, Wolfram B ^a   Deacon, Robert M J ^a   Seeburg, Peter H ^b   Rawlins, J Nicholas P ^a   Bannerman, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

AMPA receptors; Hippocampus; LTP; Mice; Radial maze; Spatial memory

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMATE A RECEPTOR; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR; RECEPTOR SUBUNIT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; AMPA RECEPTOR; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR IONOTROPIC, AMPA 1;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE TARGETING; HIPPOCAMPUS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; MAZE TEST; MEMORY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WILD TYPE; WORKING MEMORY; ANIMAL; BEHAVIOR; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; GENETICS; MEMORY DISORDER; MOUSE MUTANT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MAZE LEARNING; MEMORY DISORDERS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; RECEPTORS, AMPA; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0038206542     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-09-03953.2003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aggleton JP, Neave N, Nagle S, Sahgal A (1995) A comparison of the effects of medial prefrontal, cingulate cortex, and cingulum bundle lesions on tests of spatial memory: evidence of a double dissociation between frontal and cingulum bundle contributions. J Neurosci 15:7270-7281.
2. Barry MF, Ziff EB (2002) Receptor trafficking and the plasticity of excitatory synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:279-286.
3. Bliss TVP, Lømo T (1973) Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol (Lond) 232:331-356.
4. Bolhuis JJ, Reid IC (1992) Effects of intraventricular infusion of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist AP5 on spatial memory of rats in a radial maze. Behav Brain Res 47:151-157.
5. Brun VH, Otnæss MK, Molden S, Steffenach H-A, Witter MP, Moser M-B, Moser EI (2002) Place cells and place recognition maintained by direct entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry. Science 296:2243-2246.
6. Caramanos Z, Shapiro ML (1994) Spatial memory and NMDA receptor antagonists APV and MK-801: memory impairments depend on familiarity with the environment, drug dose and training duration. Behav Neurosci 108:30-43.
7. Collingridge GL, Kehl SJ, McLennan H (1983) Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral-commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. J Physiol (Lond) 334:33-46.
8. Danysz W, Wroblewski JT, Costa E (1988) Learning impairment in rats by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists. Neuropharmacology 27:653-656.
9. Deacon RMJ, Bannerman DM, Kirby BP, Croucher A, Rawlins JNP (2002) The effects of cytotoxic hippocampal lesions in mice on a cognitive test battery. Behav Brain Res 133:57-68.
10. Delatour B, Gisquet-Verrier P (1996) Prelimbic cortex specific lesions disrupt delayed-variable response tasks in the rat. Behav Neurosci 110:1282-1298.
11. Delatour B, Gisquet-Verrier P (2000) Functional role of rat prelimbic-infralimbic cortices in spatial memory: evidence for their involvement in attention and behavioural flexibility. Behav Brain Res 109:113-128.
12. Dias R, Aggleton JP (2000) Effects of selective excitotoxic prefrontal lesions on acquisition of nonmatching- and matching-to-place in the T-maze in the rat: differential involvement of the prelimbic-infralimbic and anterior cingulate cortices in providing behavioural flexibility. Eur J Neurosci 12:4457-4466.
13. Goldman-Rakic PS (1987) Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In: Handbook of physiology, The nervous system (Plum F, ed), pp 373-417. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
14. Gray JA, McNaughton N (1983) Comparison between the behavioural effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:119-188.
15. Hoffman D, Sprengel R, Sakmann B (2002) Molecular dissection of associative plasticity in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7740-7745.
16. Honig WK (1978) Studies of working memory in the pigeon. In: Cognitive processes in animal behavior (Hulse SH, Fowler HF, Honig WK, eds), pp 211-248. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
17. Jarrard LE (1983) Selective hippocampal lesions and behavior: effects of kainic acid lesions on performance of place and cue tasks. Behav Neurosci 97:873-889.
18. Jarrard LE (1993) On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behav Neural Biol 60:9-26.
19. Malinow R, Malenka RC (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:103-126.
20. Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RGM (2000) Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:649-711.
21. Morris RGM, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M (1986) Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319:774-776.
22. Olton DS, Samuelson RJ (1976) Remembrance of places passed: spatial memory in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2:97-116.
23. Olton DS, Becker IT, Handelmann E (1979) Hippocampus, space and memory. Behav Brain Sci 2:313-366.
24. Rawlins JNP, Olton DS (1982) The septohippocampal system and cognitive mapping. Behav Brain Res 5:331-358.
25. Reisel D, Bannerman DM, Schmitt WB, Deacon RMJ, Flint J, Borchardt T, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JNP (2002) Spatial memory dissociations in mice lacking GluR1. Nat Neurosci 5:868-873.
26. Shaw C, Aggleton JP (1993) The effects of fornix and medial prefrontal lesions on delayed non-matching-to-sample by rats. Behav Brain Res 54:91-102.
27. Steele RJ, Morris RGM (1999) Delay-dependent impairment of a matching-to-place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA antagonist D-AP5. Hippocampus 9:118-136.
28. Tonkiss J, Rawlins JNP (1991) The competitive NMDA antagonist, AP5, but not the non-competitive antagonist, MK-801, induces a delay-related impairment in spatial working memory in rats. Exp Brain Res 85:349-358.
29. Zamanillo D, Sprengel R, Hvalby O, Jensen V, Burnashev N, Rozov A, Kaiser KM, Koster HJ, Borchardt T, Worley P, Lubke J, Frotscher M, Kelly PH, Sommer B, Andersen P, Seeburg PH, Sakmann B (1999) Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. Science 284:1805-1811.