Delay-dependent impairment of a matching-to-place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA-antagonist D-AP5

Hippocampus

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 118-136

  Steele, R J ^a   Morris, R G M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Delayed matching to place; Event memory; Hippocampus; NMDA receptors; Spatial memory; Working memory

Indexed keywords

DAP 5; IBOTENIC ACID; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMNESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTATE GYRUS; DIFFUSION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HIPPOCAMPUS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTRACEREBROVENTRICULAR DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MAZE TEST; MEMORY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPATIAL MEMORY; TRAINING;

2-AMINO-5-PHOSPHONOVALERATE; ANIMALS; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID ANTAGONISTS; HIPPOCAMPUS; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MICROINJECTIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; REACTION TIME; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRITIUM;

EID: 0032891813     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:2<118::AID-HIPO4>3.0.CO;2-8     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aggleton JP, Hunt PR, Rawlins JNP. 1986. The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working-memory. Behav Brain Res 19:133-146.
2. Anonymous. 1997. Mutant mice and neuroscience: recommendations concerning genetic background. Neuron 19:755-759.
3. Bannerman DM, Good MA. Butcher SP, Ramsay M, Morris RGM. 1995. Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade. Nature 378:182-186.
4. Bohbot V, Otahal P, Liu Z, Nadel L, Bures J. 1996. Electroconvulsive shock and lidocaine reveal rapid consolidation of spatial working memory in the watermaze. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4016-4019.
5. Cain DP. 1997. LTP, genes and learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:235-242.
6. Cain DP, Saucier D, Hall J, Hargteaves EL, Boon F. 1996. Detailed behavioral analysis of water maze acquisition under APV or CNQX: contribution of sensorimotor disturbances to drug-induced acquisition deficits. Behav Neurosci 110:86-102.
7. Caramanos Z, Shapiro ML. 1994. Spatial memory and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonists APV and MK-801: memory impairments depend on familiarity with the environment, drug dose and training duration. Behav Neurosci 108:30-43.
8. Clayton NS. 1998. Memory and the hippocampus in food-storing birds: a comparative approach. Neuropharmacology 37:441-452.
9. Clayton NS, Dickinson A 1998. Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays Nature 395:272-274.
10. Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum HE. 1993. Memory amnesia and the hippocampal system. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
11. Cole BJ, Klewer M, Jones GH, Stephens DN. 1993. Contrasting effects of the competitive NMDA antagonist CPP and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK801 on performance of an operant delayed matching to position task in rats. Psychopharmacology 111:465-471.
12. Danysz W, Zajaczkowski W, Parsons CG. 1995. Modulation of learning processes by ionotropic glutamate receptor ligands. Behav Pharmacol 6:455-474.
13. Davis S, Butcher SP, Morris RGM. 1992. The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro. J Neurosci 12:21-34.
14. Eichenbaum H, Stewart C, Morris RGM. 1990. Hippocampal representation in place learning J Neurosci 10:3531-3542.
15. Ellison G. 1995. The N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists phencyclidine, ketamine and drzocilpine as both behavioral and anatomical models of the dementias. Brain Res Rev 20:250-267.
16. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. 1997. Central cholinergic systems and cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 48:649-684.
17. Fanselow MS, Kim JJ, Yipp J, Deoca B. 1994. Differential-effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate on acquisition of fear of auditory and contextual cues. Behav Neurosci 108:235-240.
18. Gallagher M, Columbo PJ. 1995. The cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive decline Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:161-168.
19. Gerlai R. 1996. Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype? Trends Neurosci 19:177-181.
20. Good M, dHoz L, Morris RGM. 1998. Contigent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions. Hippocampus 8:147-159.
21. Hasslemo ME. 1995. Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior. Behav Brain Res 67:1-27.
22. Jacobs LF. 1995. The ecology of spatial cognition. In: Alleva E, editor. Behavioral brain research in naturalistic and semi-naturalistic settings. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic, p 301-322.
23. Jarrard LE. 1989. On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci Methods 29:251-259.
24. Lathe R, Morris RGM. 1994. Analysing brain function and dysfunction transgenic animals. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 20:350-358.
25. Li H-B, Matsumoto K, Yamamoto M, Watanabe H. 1997. NMDA not not AMPA receptor antagonists impair the delay-interposed radial maze performance of rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 58:249-253.
26. Mayford M, Abel T, Kandel ER. 1995. Transgenic approaches to cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:141-148.
27. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. 1995. Why there are complementary learning-systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory Psychol Rev 102:419-457.
28. McHugh TJ, Blum KI, Tsien JZ, Tonegawa S, Wilson MA. 1996. Impaired hippocampal representation of space in CA1-specific NMDAR1 knockout mice. Cell 87:1339-1349.
29. Morris RGM. 1981. Spatial localisation does not depend on the presence of local cues. Learning Motivation 12:239-260.
30. Morris RGM. 1983. An attempt to dissociate 'spatial mapping' and 'working-memory' theories of hippocampal function. In: Siefert W, editor. Neurobiology of the hippocampus. London: Academic Press, p 405-432.
31. Morris RGM. 1989. Synaptic plasticity and learning selective impairment of learning in rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5. J Neurosci 9:3040-3057.
32. Morris RGM, Frey U. 1997. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity: role in spatial learning or the automatic recording of attended experience? Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 352:1489-1503.
33. Morris RGM, Garrud P, Rawlins JNP, O'Keefe J. 1982. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681-683.
34. Morris RGM, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M. 1986. Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319:774-776.
35. Morris RGM, Halliwell RF, Bowery N. 1989. Synaptic plasticity and learning II: do different kinds of plasticity underlie different kinds of learning? Neuropsychologia 27:41-59.
36. Morris RGM, Schenk F, Tweedie F, Jarrard LE. 1990. Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: Dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci 2:1016-1028.
37. Mumby DG, Pinel JPJ. 1994. Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav Neurosci 108:11-18.
38. Mumby DG, Wood ER, Pinel JPJ 1992. Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Psychobiology 20:18-27.
39. Mumby DG, Wood ER, Duva CA, Kornecook TJ, Pinel JPJ, Phillips AG. 1996. Ischaemia-induced object-recognition deficits in rats are attentuated by hippocampal ablation before and soon after ischaemia. Behav Neurosci 110:266-281.
40. Nadel L. 1995. The role of the hippocampus in declarative memory: a comment on Zola-Morgan, Squire and Ramus 1994.. Hippocampus 5:232-234.
41. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Olney JW, Labruyere J, Price MT. 1989. Pathological changes induced in cerebrocortical neurons by phencyclidine and related drugs. Science 244:1360-1362.
43. Olney JW, Labruyere J, Wang G, Wozniak DF, Price MT, Sesma MA. 1991. NMDA antagonist neurotoxicity: mechanism and prevention. Science 254:1515-1518.
44. Olton DS, Becker JT, Handelmann GE. 1979. Hippocampus, space, and memory. Behav Brain Sci 2:313-365.
45. Panakhova E, Buresova O, Bures J. 1984. Persistence of spatial memory in the Morris water tank task. Int J Psychophysiol 2:5-10.
46. Ringo JL. 1991. Memory decays at the same rate in macaques with and without brain lesions when expressed in d' or arcsine terms. Behav Brain Res 42:123-134.
47. Ringo JL. 1993. Spared short-term-memory in monkeys following medial-temporal lobe lesions is not yet established: a reply. Behav Brain Res 59:65-72.
48. Saucier D, Cain DP. 1995. Spatial learning without NMDA receptor dependent long-term potentiation. Nature 378:186-189.
49. Schenk F, Morris RGM. 1985. Dissociation between components of spatial memory in rats after recovery from the effects of retrohippocampal lesions. Exp Brain Res 58:11-28.
50. Spooner RIW, Thomson A Hall J, Morris RGM, Salter SH. 1994. The Atlantis platform: a new design and further developmnent's of Buresova's on-demand platform for the watermaze. Learning Memory 1:203-211.
51. Squire LR. 1992. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev 99:195-231.
52. Sutherland RJ, Whishaw IQ, Kolb B. 1983. A behavioral analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate- or colchicine-induced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Behav Brain Res 7:133-153.
53. Sutherland RJ, Whishaw IQ, Kolb B. 1988. Contributions of cingulate cortex to two forms of spatial learning and memory. J Neurosci 8:1863-1872.
54. Tonkiss J, Rawlins JNP. 1991. The competitive NMDA antagonist AP5, but not the noncompetitive antagonist MK801, induces a delayrelated impairment in spatial working memory in rats. Exp Brain Res 85:349-358
55. Tonkiss J, Morris RGM, Rawlins JNP. 1988. Intra-ventricular infusion of the NMDA antagonist AP5 impairs performance on a non-spatial operant DRL task in the rat. Exp Brain Res 73:181-188.
56. Tricklebank MD, Singh L, Oles RJ, Preston C, Iversen SD. 1989. The behavioral effects of MK-801: A comparison with antagonists acting non-competitively and competitively at the NMDA receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 167:127-135.
57. Tsien JZ, Chen DF, Gerber D, Tom C, Mercer EH, Anderson DJ, Mayford M, Kandel ER, Tonegawa S. 1996a. Subregion- and cell type-restricted gene knockout in mouse brain. Cell, 87:1317-1326.
58. Tsien JZ, Huerta PT, Tonegawa S. 1996b. The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory. Cell 87:1327-1338.
59. Tulving E. 1983. Elements of episodic memory. Oxford Clarendon Press.
60. Whishaw IQ, Jarrard LE. 1996. Evidence for extrahippocampal involvement in place learning and hippocampal involvement in path integration. Hippocampus 6:513-524.
61. Wilson MA, Tonegawa S. 1997. Synaptic plasticity, place cells and spatial memory study with second generation knockouts. Trends Neurosci 20:102-106.
62. Wood ER, Mumby DG, Pinel JPJ, Phillips AG. 1993. Impaired object recognition memory in rats following ischaemia-induced damage to the hippocampus. Behav Neurosci 107:51-62.
63. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Ramus SJ, 1995. The role of the hippocampus in declarative memory. a reply to Nadel. Hippocampus 5:235-239.