Theory of electroabsorption spectroscopy in poly-nuclear Ru complexes

Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Volumn 238-239, Issue , 2003, Pages 127-141

  Ferretti, Alessandro ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Electroabsorption spectroscopy; NIR vis spectra; Poly nuclear Ru complexes; Stark spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; CALCULATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIPOLE; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; HAMILTONIAN MODEL; INFRARED RADIATION; INORGANIC CHEMISTRY; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METAL BINDING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; OPTICS; POLARIZATION; REVIEW; SURFACE CHARGE;

EID: 0038056001     PISSN: 00108545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(03)00003-1     Document Type: Review

References (131)

1. (a) M. Hanack, S. Deger, A. Lange, Coord. Chem. Rev. 83 (1988) 11;
2. (b) M. Hanack, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 160 (1988) 133;
3. (c) M. Hanack, M. Lang, Adv. Mater. 6 (1994) 819;
4. (d) A. Tomita, M. Sano, Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 200.
5. (a) P.N. Prasad, D.J. Williams, Introduction to Nonlinear Optical Effects in Molecules & Polymers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991;
6. (b) S.P. Karna, A.T. Yeates, (Eds.) Nonlinear Optical Materials: Theory and Modelling, ACS Symposium Series 628, Washington DC, 1996;
7. (c) S. Di Bella, Chem. Soc. Rev. 30 (2001) 355;
8. (d) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, G. Villani, J. Phys. Chem. 101 (1997) 9439;
9. (e) I.A. Sheadi, L.F. Murga, M.J. Ondrechen, J. Lindergerg, Chem. Phys. Lett. 291 (1998) 325.
10. (a) A. Bencini, A.V. Palii, S.M. Ostrovsky, B.S. Tsukerblat, M.G. Uytterhoeven, Mol. Phys. 86 (1995) 1085;
11. (b) E.L. Bominaar, C. Achim, S.A. Borshch, J.J. Gired, E. Münck, Inorg. Chem. 36 (1997) 3689;
12. (c) V. Barone, A. Bencini, I. Ciofini, C.A. Daul, F. Totti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 8357;
13. (d) J.J. Borrás-Almenar, E. Coronado, S.M. Ostrovsky, A.V. Palii, B.S. Tsukerblat, Chem. Phys. Lett. 240 (1999) 149;
14. (e) M.I. Belinsky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 240 (1999) 303.
15. (a) M.D. Newton, Chem. Rev. 91 (1991) 767;
16. (b) P.F. Barbara, T.J. Meyer, M.A. Ratner, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 13148;
17. (c) W.B. Davis, W.A. Svec, M.A. Ratner, MR. Wasielewski, Nature 396 (1998) 60;
18. (d) P. Chen, T.J. Meyer, Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1439.
19. (a) V. Balzani, F. Scandola, Supramolecular Photochemistry, Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1991;
20. (b) B. Schlike, P. Belser, L. De Cola, E. Sabbioni, V. Balzani, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 4207;
21. (c) L. Flamigni, F. Barigelletti, N. Armaroli, J.P. Collin, I.M. Dixon, J.-P. Sauvage, J.A. Gareth Williams, Coord. Chem. Rev. 190-192 (1999) 671.
22. (a) S. Woitellier, J.P. Launay, C. Joachim, Chem. Phys. 131 (1989) 481;
23. (b) (see papers)J. Jortner, M.A. Ratner (Eds.), Molecular Electronics, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1997;
24. (c) S. Arounaguiri, B.G. Maiya, Inorg. Chem. 38 (1999) 842;
25. (d) F. Remacle, S. Speiser, R.D. Levine, J. Phys. Chem. Sect. B 105 (2001) 5589;
26. (e) Y. Asai, K. Onishi, S. Miyata, S.-J. Kim, M. Matsumoto, K. Shigehara, J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 (2001) A305.
27. (a) G.O. Bublitz, S.G. Boxer, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48 (1997) 213;
28. (b) B.S. Brunschwig, C. Creutz, N. Sutin, Coord. Chem. Rev. 177 (1998) 61;
29. (c) F.W. Vance, R.D. Williams, J.T. Hupp, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 17 (1998) 307.
30. N.S. Hush, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 8 (1967) 391.
31. R.J. Cave, M.D. Newton, Chem. Phys. Lett. 249 (1996) 15.
32. Y.K. Shin, B.S. Brunschwig, C. Creutz, N. Sutin, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 8157.
33. (a) W. Liptay, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 8 (1969) 177;
34. (b) W. Liptay, in: E.C. Lim (Ed.), Excited States, vol. I, Academic Press, NY, 1974, p. 129.
35. Solvatochromic effect, which is the dependence of position and intensity of the band on the solvent, can roughly be seen as an electrochromic effect caused by the solvent reaction field, when the solvent can be treated as a dielectric continuum medium. Unfortunately this is not the case for the present complexes. See Ref. [11b] and N.S. Hush, J.R. Reimers, Coord. Chem. Rev. 177 (1998) 37.
36. (a) D.H. Oh, S.G. Boxer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 8161;
37. (b) D.H. Oh, M. Sano, S.G. Boxer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 6880.
38. J.R. Reimers, N.S. Hush, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 9773.
39. ext, where f is the local field correction. If the solute molecule is seen as in a spherical cavity surrounded by the-solvent, modeled as a dielectric continuum medium, f = 3D/2D + 1 (D is static relative dielectric constant of the glassy matrix) and ranges between 1 and 1.3 [7c, 11b, 14].
40. (a) L. Karki, H.P. Lu, J.T. Hupp, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 15637;
41. (b) L. Karki, J.T. Hupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (1997) 4070;
42. (c) L. Karki, R.D. Williams, J.T. Hupp, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998) 2837;
43. (d) F.W. Vance, L. Karki, J.K. Reigle, J.T. Hupp, M.A. Ratner, J. Phys. Chem. Sect. A 102 (1998) 8320;
44. (e) F.W. Vance, R.V. Slone, C.L. Stern, J.T. Hupp, Chem. Phys. 253 (2000) 313;
45. (f) R.C. Johnson, J.T. Hupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 2053.
46. (a) G.U. Bublitz, W.M. Laidlaw, R.G. Denning, S.G. Boxer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 6068;
47. (b) S. Franzen, V.M. Miskowski, A.P. Shreve, S.E. Wallace-Williams, W.H. Woodruff, M.R. Ondrias, M.E. Barr, L. Moore, S.G. Boxer, Inorg. Chem. 40 (2001) 6375.
48. (a) L.F. Murga, M.J. Ondrechen, Inorg. Biochem. 70 (1998) 245;
49. (b) L.F. Murga, A. Ferretti, A. Lami, M.J. Ondrechen, G. Villani, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1 (1998) 137;
50. (c) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, L.F. Murga, I.A. Shehadi, M.J. Ondrechen, G. Villani, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 2594;
51. (d) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, R. Improta, G. Villani, J. Phys. Chem. 104 (2000) 201;
52. (e) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, R. Improta, G. Villani, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3 (2001) 2576;
53. (f) I. Cacelli, A. Ferretti, A. Toniolo, J. Phys. Chem. Sect. A 105 (2001) 4480.
54. C. Creutz, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91 (1969) 3988.
55. (a) C. Creutz, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 30 (1983) 1;
56. (b) R.J. Crutchley, Adv. Inorg. Chem. 41 (1994) 273;
57. (c) J.F. Endicott, M.A. Watzky, X. Song, T. Buranda, Coord. Chem. Rev. 159 (1997) 295;
58. (d) K.D. Demadis, C.M. Hartshorn, T.J. Meyer, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 2655;
59. (e) J.P. Launay, Chem. Soc. Rev. 30 (2001) 386;
60. (f) J.T. Hupp, R.D. Williams, Ace. Chem. Res. 34 (2001) 808.
61. (a) M.F. Hornung, F. Bauman, W. Kaim, J.A. Olabe, L.D. Slep, J. Fiedler, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998) 311;
62. (b) G.N. Richardson, U. Brand, H. Vahrenkamp, Inorg. Chem. 38 (1999) 3070;
63. (c) M. Glöckle, W. Kaim, N.E. Katz, M.G. Posse, E.H. Cutin, J. Fiedler, Inorg. Chem. 38 (1999) 3270;
64. (d) Y.J. Chen, C.-H. Kao, S.J. Lin, C.-C Tai, K.S. Kwan, Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 189;
65. (e) K.D. Demadis, G.A. Neyhart, E.M. Kober, P.S. White, T.J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 3430;
66. (f) C. He, S.J. Lippard, Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 5225;
67. (g) J.F. Endicott, A.V. Macatangay, Inorg. Chem 39 (2000) 437;
68. (h) W. Kaim, A.L. Klein, M. Glöckle, Acc. Chem. Res. 33 (2000) 755;
69. (i) A. Geiss, M.J. Kolm, C. Janiak, H. Vahrenkam, Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 4037;
70. (j) P.J. Moser, G.P.A. Yap, R.J. Crutchley, Inorg. Chem. 40 (2001) 1189;
71. (k) M. De Rosa, C.A. White, C.E.B. Evans, R.J. Crutchley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 1396;
72. (l) B.W. Pfennig, V.A. Fritchman, K.A. Hayman, Inorg. Chem. 40 (2001) 255;
73. (m) M. Sommovigo, A. Ferretti, M. Venturi, P. Ceroni, C. Giardi, G. Denti, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 1263;
74. (n) M. Glöckle, W. Kaim, A. Klein, E. Roduner, G. Hübner, S. Zalis, J. van Slageren, F. Renz, P. Gütlich, Inorg. Chem. 40 (2001) 2256.
75. M.B. Robin, P. Day, Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 10 (1967) 247.
76. A. Lami, Chem. Phys. 273 (2001) 159.
77. (a) I.B. Bersuker, S.A. Borshch, in: I. Prigogine, S.A. Rice (Eds.), Advances in Chemical Physics LXXXI, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992, p. 703;
78. (b) I.B. Bersuker, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 1067.
79. (a) K.K. Stavrev, M. Zerner, T.J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 8684;
80. (b) G.M. Pearl, M. Zerner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 399;
81. (c) Y.K. Shin, B.S. Brunschwig, C. Creutz, M.D. Newton, N. Sutin, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 1104;
82. (d) J. Zeng, N.S. Hush, J.R. Reimers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 2059;
83. (e) J. Zeng, N.S. Hush, J.R. Reimers, J. Phys. Chem. Soc. 100 (1996) 19292;
84. (f) I. Cacelli, A. Ferretti, J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 8583;
85. (g) I. Cacelli, A. Ferretti, J. Phys. Chem. 103 (1999) 4438.
86. G.U. Bublitz, S.G. Boxer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 3988.
87. (a) S.F. Nelsen, M.D. Newton, J. Phys. Chem. Sect. A 104 (2000) 10023;
88. (b) M.D. Newton, this issue of Coord. Chem. Rev.
89. M. Rust, J. Lappe, R.J. Cave, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 3930.
90. (a) K.Y. Wong, P.N. Schatz, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 28 (1981) 369;
91. (b) R.L. Fulton, M. Gouterman, J. Chem. Phys. 41 (1964) 2280.
92. (a) P. Durand, J.-P. Malrieu, in: K.P. Lawley (Ed.), Ab initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry - I, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987;
93. (b) M.R. Hoffmann, in: D.R Yarkony (Ed.), Modern electronic structure theory. Part. II, Advances Series in Physical Chemistry, vol. 2, World Scientific, Singapore, 1995, p. 1166.
94. C. Creutz, M.D. Newton, N. Sutin, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 82 (1994) 47.
95. A. Lami, F. Santoro, J. Chem. Phys. 106 (1996) 94 (and references therein).
96. S.B. Piepho, E.R. Krausz, P.N. Schatz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978) 2996.
97. M. Tanner, A. Ludi, Inorg. Chem. 20 (1981) 2348.
98. (a) M.J. Ondrechen, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 14 (1995) 1;
99. (b) L.F. Murga, M.J. Ondrechen, Theor. Chim. Acta 90 (1995) 331.
100. (a) J. Ko, M.J. Ondrechen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 6161;
101. (b) K. Prassides, P.N. Schatz, K.Y. Wong, P. Day, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1986) 5588;
102. (c) M.J. Ondrechen, J. Ko, L.-T. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) 1672;
103. (d) S.B. Piepho, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 6319;
104. (e) R. Bozio, A. Feis, I. Zanon, C. Pecile, J. Chem. Phys. 91 (1989) 13;
105. (f) S.B. Piepho, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 4197;
106. (g) K. Prassides, P.N. Schatz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 178 (1991) 227;
107. (h) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, M.J. Ondrechen, G. Villani, J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 10484 and Erratum, 100 (1996) 20174;
108. (h) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, M.J. Ondrechen, G. Villani, J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 10484 and Erratum, 100 (1996) 20174;
109. (i) J.R. Reimers, N.S. Hush, Chem. Phys. 208 (1996) 177;
110. (j) D.S. Talaga, J.I. Zink, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 8712.
111. (a) Frank Jensen, Introduction to Computational Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999;
112. (b) C.H. Martin, K.F. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 105 (1996) 1437.
113. L.-T. Zhang, J. Ko, M.J. Ondrechen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) 1666.
114. (a) O.V. Sizova, V.I. Baranovskii, N.V. Ivanova, A.I. Panin, Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 24 (1998) 234;
115. (b) A. Bencini, I. Ciofini, C.A. Daul, A. Ferretti, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 11418;
116. (c) Z. Chen, J. Bian, L. Zhang, S. Li, J. Chem. Phys. 111 (1999) 10926.
117. J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 285 (1964) 542.
118. (a) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, Chem. Phys. 181 (1994) 107;
119. (b) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, Chem. Phys. Lett. 220 (1994) 327;
120. (c) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, G. Villani, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998) 2799;
121. (d) A. Ferretti, A. Lami, G. Villani, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998) 4460.
122. (a) E.B. Wilson, J.C. Decius, P.C. Cross, Molecular Vibrations, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1955;
123. (b) J.I. Steinfield, Molecules and Radiation, Harper and Row, New York, 1974.
124. (a) S.I. Gorelsky, E.S. Dodsworth, A.B.P. Lever, A.A. Vlcek, Coord. Chem. Rev. 174 (1998) 469;
125. (b) A.B.P. Lever, S.I. Gorelsky, Coord. Chem. Rev. 208 (2000) 153 (and references therein).
126. The MLCT band of the various complexes show a monotonic dependence on the solvent Gutmann donor number (V. Gutmann, The donor-acceptor approach to molecular interactions, Plenum, New York, 1978, p. 19) and not on the dielectric constant. In the NIR different behavior is observed depending on the bridging ligand. (a) G.M. Tom, C. Creutz, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68 (1974) 7827; C Creutz, M.H. Chou, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2995; J.T. Hupp, T.J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2332.
127. The MLCT band of the various complexes show a monotonic dependence on the solvent Gutmann donor number (V. Gutmann, The donor-acceptor approach to molecular interactions, Plenum, New York, 1978, p. 19) and not on the dielectric constant. In the NIR different behavior is observed depending on the bridging ligand. (a) G.M. Tom, C. Creutz, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68 (1974) 7827; C Creutz, M.H. Chou, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2995; J.T. Hupp, T.J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2332.
128. The MLCT band of the various complexes show a monotonic dependence on the solvent Gutmann donor number (V. Gutmann, The donor-acceptor approach to molecular interactions, Plenum, New York, 1978, p. 19) and not on the dielectric constant. In the NIR different behavior is observed depending on the bridging ligand. (a) G.M. Tom, C. Creutz, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68 (1974) 7827; C Creutz, M.H. Chou, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2995; J.T. Hupp, T.J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 2332.
129. J. Tomasi, M. Persico, Chem. Rev. 94 (1994) 2027.
130. (a) R. Cimiraglia, J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1985) 1746;
131. (b) C. Angeli, R. Cimiraglia, M. Persico, A. Toniolo, Theor. Chem. Acc. 98 (1997) 57.