Orbital specific charge transfer distances, solvent reorganization energies, and electronic coupling energies: Electronic stark effect studies of parallel and orthogonal intervalence transfer in (NC)5Os(II)-CN- Ru(III)(NH3)5-

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 119, Issue 17, 1997, Pages 4070-4073

  Karki, Laba ^a   Hupp, Joseph T ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYANIDE; OSMIUM; RUTHENIUM;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY TRANSFER; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030908731     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja963279l     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. For reviews see: (a) Creutz, C. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 1.
2. (b) Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1984, 35, 437.
3. (c) Newton, M. D. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 767.
4. (d) Crutchley, R. J. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 41, 273.
5. (a) Forlando, P.; Baraldo, L. M.; Olabe, J. A.; Della Vedova, C. O. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 223, 37-42.
6. (b) Vogler, A.; Klissinger, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2311.
7. (c) Vogler, A.; Osman, A. H.; Kunkley, H. C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1985, 64, 159.
8. (a) Curtis, J. C.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 1562.
9. (b) Kober, E. M.; Goldsby, K. A.; Narayana, D. N. S.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 4303.
10. (c) Karki, L.; Lu, H. P.; Hupp, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 15637.
11. Karki, L.; Hupp, J. T. Inorg. Chem. In press.
12. (a) Goodman, B. A.; Raynor, J. B. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Rodiochem. 1970, 13, 192.
13. (b) Hill, N. J. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1972, 68, 427.
14. In view of both ligand-field splitting effects and differences in vibrational and solvational reorganization energy (below), exact agreement is not expected.
15. Liptay, W. In Excited States; Lim, E. C., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1974; Vol 1, pp 129-229.
16. (a) Oh, D. H.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8161.
17. (b) Oh, D. H.; Sano, M.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6880.
18. ext is the externally applied electric field.
19. xy donor orbital with respect to the charge transfer axis. Conceivably, the deviation is an artifact attributable to errors in the initial spectral deconvolution.
20. 3
21. Vance, F. W.; Stern, C. S. Unpublished X-ray crystallographic studies.
22. (a) Cave, R.; Newton, M. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 249, 15.
23. (b) Creutz, C.; Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1994, 82, 47.
24. (a) Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9773.
25. (b) Shin, Y. K.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8668.
26. (c) Shin, Y. K.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 8157.
27. See: Brunschwig, B. S.; Ehrenson, S.; Sutin, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3657. The mixed valence complex was treated as an ellipsoid with a semimajor axis 12.4 Å in length, a pair of semiminor axes 7 Å in length, and an interfocal distance of 10.2 Å .
28. -1, respectively.
29. 12(perpendicular) defining the lower limit). On the other hand, the conclusions regarding adiabatic charge transfer distance and solvent reorganization (derived from electroabsorption spectra) are not predicated upon specific assumptions concerning the mechanism(s) by which the perpendicular transition derives linear absorption intensity.
30. For an erudite discussion see: Sutin, N. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 441.