Electroabsorption spectroscopy of charge-transfer states of transition-metal complexes. 2. Metal-to-ligand and ligand-to-metal charge-transfer excited states of pentaammineruthenium complexes

Journal of Physical Chemistry

Volumn 100, Issue 20, 1996, Pages 8157-8169

  Shin, Yeung Gyo K ^a   Brunschwig, Bruce S ^a   Creutz, Carol ^a   Sutin, Norman ^a  

^a BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; CHARGE TRANSFER; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSITION METAL COMPOUNDS;

DIPOLE MOMENTS; ELECTROABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRON TRANSFER DISTANCE; LIPTAY EQUATIONS; PENTAAMMINERUTHENIUM COMPLEXES;

RUTHENIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 0030134513     PISSN: 00223654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp953395v     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Part 1 is ref 23.
2. Ford, P.; Rudd, D. F. P.; Gaunder, R.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 1187-1194.
3. Ford, P. C.; Wink, D.; Di Benedetto, J. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 213-271.
4. Winkler, J. R.; Netzel, T. L.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2381-2392.
5. Creutz, C.; Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1994, 82, 47-59.
6. Gaunder, R. G.; Taube, H. Inorg. Chem. 1970, 9, 2627-2639.
7. Zwickel, A. M.; Creutz, C. Inorg. Chem. 1971, 10, 2395-2399.
8. Magnuson, R. H.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5129-5136.
9. Richardson, D. E.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 40-51.
10. Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9773-9781.
11. de Haas, M. P.; Warman, J. M. Chem. Phys. 1982, 73, 35-53.
12. Smirnov, S. N.; Braun, C. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 9587-9591.
13. Smirnov, S. N.; Braun, C. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1953-1961.
14. Smimov, S. N.; Braun, C. L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 217, 167-172.
15. Fessenden, R. W.; Hitachi, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 3456-3462.
16. Curtis, J. C.; Sullivan, B. P.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 224-236.
17. Creutz, C.; Chou, M. H. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 2995-3000.
18. Schoonover, J. R.; Gordon, K. G.; Argazzi, R.; Woodruff, W. H.; Peterson, K. A.; Bignozzi, C. A.; Dyer, R. B.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10996-10997.
19. Lu, H.; Petrov, V.; Hupp, J. T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 235, 521-527.
20. Oh, D. H.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8161-8162.
21. Oh, D. H.; Sano, M.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6880-6890.
22. Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. In Mixed Valency Systems: Applications in Chemistry, Physics and Biology; Prassides, K., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1991; pp 29-50.
23. Shin, Y.-g. K.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8668-8669.
24. Sutton, J. E.; Taube, H. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 4021-4023.
25. Ando, I.; Ishimura, D.; Mitsumi, M.; Ujimoto, K.; Kurihara, H. Polyhedron 1992, 11, 2335-2340.
26. Press, W. H.; Flannery, B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vetterling, W. T. Numerical Recipes; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1990; pp 381-385.
27. Oh, D. H. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, June, 1991.
28. 2 are the refractive indexes of the sample glass (1.4) and liquid nitrogen (1.2), respectively.
29. Labhart, H. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1967, 13, 179-204.
30. Liptay, W. In Excited States; Lim, E. C., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1974; Vol. 1, pp 129-229.
31. Baumann, W. In Physical Methods of Chemistry; Rossiter, B. W., Hamilton, J. F., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1989; Vol. IIIB, pp 45-131.
32. Baumann, W.; Nagy, Z.; Maiti, A. K.; Reis, H.; Rodriques, S. V.; Detzer, N. In Dynamics and Mechanism of Photoinduced Charge Transfer and Related Phenomena; Mataga, N., Okada, T., Masuhara, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1992; pp 211-229.
33. Shin, Y.-g. K.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 1104-1110.
34. Krauss, T. P.; Shure, L.; Little, J. N. Signal Processing Toolbox for Use with MATLAB Guide; The Mathworks: Natick, MA, 1994; pp 2.23-2.26.
35. Ponder, M.; Mathies, R. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 5090-5098.
36. Czekalla, J.; Wick, G. Z. Electrochem. 1961, 65, 727-734.
37. Czekalla, J.; Liptay, W.; Meyer, K.-O. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1963, 67, 465-470.
38. Lippert, E. Z. Electrochem. 1957, 61, 925-975.
39. Kawski, A.; Gryczynski, I.; Jung, C.; Heckner, K.-H. Z. Naturforsch. 1977, 32a, 420-425.
40. Blackbourn, R. L.; Dong, Y.; Lyon, L. A.; Hupp, J. T. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 4446-4452.
41. Waysbort, D.; Evenor, M.; Navon, G. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 514-519.
42. Mathies, R.; Stryer, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1976, 73, 2169-2173.
43. Kanis, D. R.; Ratner, M. A.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 195-242.
44. ge is a vector with x, y, and z spatial components. It is often necessary to sum over either the spatial components or the states. When the sum is over the spatial components, a subscript i, j, or k is used, while r or s is used for the sum over states. Note that state quantities are denoted by a single subscript g or e and transition quantities by a double subscript.
45. Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 249, 15-19.
46. Shin, Y.-g. K.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N., to be published.
47. Cheng, L.-T.; Tam, W.; Eaton, D. F. Organometallics 1990, 9, 2856-2857.
48. Calabrese, J. C.; Cheng, L.-T.; Green, J. C.; Marder, S. R.; Tam, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7227-7232.
49. Zerner, M., the Quantum Chemistry Package, University of Florida.
50. +, with the added proton placed 2.0 Å from the ligating nitrogen to simulate the effect of the charge of the Ru(II) center. For the INDO calculations the proton was removed and replaced by the appropriate charge (2+ or 3+) to simulate the metal center.
51. Allinger, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 8127-8134.
52. Equation 1a of ref 23 contains a typographical error; the equation should be identical with eq 40a of this paper. The correct equation was used in the calculations reported in ref 23.
53. 3. Furthermore, the last two terms are relatively small and tend to cancel.
54. Onsager, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1936, 58, 1486-1493.
55. 0.