Site selection under differential predation risks by drifting prey in streams

Oikos

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 85-94

  Ruetz III, Carl R ^a,b   Stephens, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Lake Michigan Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DRIFT; FOOD AVAILABILITY; HABITAT SELECTION; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; STREAM;

EID: 0038000675     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12242.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allan, J. D. 1978. Trout predation and the size composition of stream drift. - Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 1231-1237.
2. Allan, J. D. 1984. The size composition of invertebrate drift in a Rocky Mountain stream. - Oikos 43: 68-76.
3. Allan, J. D. 1995. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. - Chapman and Hall.
4. Allan, J. D. and Feifarek, B. P. 1989. Distances travelled by drifting mayfly nymphs: factors influencing return to the substrate. - J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 322-330.
5. Allan, J. D., Flecker, A. S. and McClintock, N. L. 1986. Diel epibenthic activity of mayfly nymphs, and its nonconcordance with behavioral drift. - Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 1057-1065.
6. Anderson, N. H. 1966. Depressant effect of moonlight on activity of aquatic insects. - Nature 209: 319-320.
7. Andersson, K. G., Brönmark, C., Herrmann, J. et al. 1986. Presence of sculpins (Cottus gobio) reduces drift and activity of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda). - Hydrobiologia 133: 209-215.
8. Anholt, B. R. 1995. Density dependence resolves the stream drift paradox. - Ecology 76: 2235-2239.
9. Brittain, J. E. and Eikeland, T. J. 1988. Invertebrate drift - a review. - Hydrobiologia 166: 77-93.
10. Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 9: 129-136.
11. Ciborowski, J. J. H. 1983. Downstream and lateral transport of nymphs of two mayfly species (Ephemeroptera). - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 2025-2029.
12. Ciborowski, J. J. H. 1987. Dynamics of drift and microdistribution of two mayfly populations: a predictive model. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44: 832-845.
13. Ciborowski, J. J. H. and Corkum, L. D. 1980. Importance of behavior to the re-establishment of drifting Ephemeroptera. - In: Flannagan, J. F. and Marshall, K. E. (eds), Advances in Ephemeroptera biology. Plenum Press, pp. 321-330.
14. Cooper, S. D., Walde, S. J. and Peckarsky, B. L. 1990. Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. - Ecology 71: 1503-1514.
15. Culp, J. M., Glozier, N. E. and Scrimgeour, G. J. 1991. Reduction of predation risk under the cover of darkness: avoidance responses of mayfly larvae to a benthic fish. - Oecologia 86: 163-169.
16. Dahl, J. 1998. Effects of a benthivorous and a drift-feeding fish on a benthic stream assemblage. - Oecologia 116: 426-432.
17. Dill, L. M. 1987. Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. - Can. J. Zool. 65: 803-811.
18. Douglas, P. L., Forrester, G. E. and Cooper, S. D. 1994. Effects of trout on the diel periodicity of drifting in baetid mayflies. - Oecologia 98: 48-56.
19. Elliott, J. M. 1967. Invertebrate drift in a Dartmoor stream. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 63: 202-237.
20. Elliott, J. M. 1971. The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream. - Oecologia 6: 350-379.
21. Englund, G. 1997. Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. - Ecology 78: 2316-2325.
22. Fausch, K. D., Nakano, S. and Kitano, S. 1997. Experimentally induced foraging mode shift by sympatric charrs in a Japanese mountain stream. - Behav. Ecol. 8: 414-420.
23. Feltmate, B. W. and Williams, D. D. 1989. Influence of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) on density and feeding behaviour of a perlid stonefly. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 1575-1580.
24. Flecker, A. S. 1992. Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from neotropical streams. - Ecology 73: 438-448.
25. Fraser, D. F. and Huntingford, F. A. 1986. Feeding and avoiding predation hazard: the behavioral response of the prey. - Ethology 73: 56-68.
26. Gilliam, J. F. 1990. Hunting by the hunted: optimal prey selection by foragers under predation hazard. - In: Hughes, R. N. (ed.), Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. Springer-Verlag, pp. 797-818.
27. Gilliam, J. F. and Fraser, D. F. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minnows. - Ecology 68: 1856-1862.
28. Huhta, A., Muotka, T., Juntunen, A. and Yrjönen, M. 1999. Behavioural interactions in stream food webs: the case of drift-feeding fish, predatory invertebrates and grazing mayflies. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 917-927.
29. Huhta, A., Muotka, T. and Tikkanen, P. 2000. Nocturnal drift of mayfly nymphs as a post-contact antipredator mechanism. - Freshw. Biol. 45: 33-42.
30. Kohler, S. L. 1985. Identification of stream drift mechanisms: an experimental and observational approach. - Ecology 66: 1749-1761.
31. Kohler, S. L. and McPeek, M. A. 1989. Predation risk and the foraging behavior of competing stream insects. - Ecology 70: 1811-1825.
32. Lima, S. L. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. - Bioscience 48: 25-34.
33. Lima, S. L. and Dill, L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
34. Malmqvist, B. 1988. Downstream drift in Madeiran Levadas: test of hypotheses relating to the influence of predators on the drift of insects. - Aquat. Insects 10: 141-152.
35. McIntosh, A. R. and Peckarsky, B. L. 1999. Criteria determining behavioural responses to multiple predators by a stream mayfly. - Oikos 85: 554-564.
36. McIntosh, A. R. and Townsend, C. R. 1998. Do different predators affect distance, direction, and destination of movements by a stream mayfly? - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 1954-1960.
37. Miyasaka, H. and Nakano, S. 1999. Effects of drift- and benthic-foraging fish on the drift dispersal of three species of mayfly nymphs in a Japanese stream. - Oecologia 118: 99-106.
38. Newman, R. M. and Waters, T. F. 1984. Size-selective predation on Gammarus pseudolimnaeus by trout and sculpins. - Ecology 65: 1535-1545.
39. Nonacs, P. and Dill, L. M. 1990. Mortality risk vs food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. - Ecology 71: 1886-1892.
40. Peckarsky, B. L. 1996. Alternative predator avoidance syndromes of stream-dwelling mayfly larvae. - Ecology 77: 1888-1905.
41. Peckarsky, B. L. and McIntosh, A. R. 1998. Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators. - Oecologia 113: 565-576.
42. Peckarsky, B. L., Taylor, B. W., McIntosh, A. R. et al. 2001. Variation in mayfly size at metamorphosis as a developmental response to risk of predation. - Ecology 82: 740-757.
43. Scrimgeour, G. J. and Culp, J. M. 1994. Foraging and evading predators: the effect of predator species on a behavioural trade-off by a lotic mayfly. - Oikos 69: 71-79.
44. Sheldon, A. L. 1984. Colonization dynamics of aquatic insects. - In: Resh, V. H. and Rosenberg, D. M. (eds), The ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger, pp. 410-429.
45. Sih, A. 1980. Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? - Science 210: 1041-1043.
46. Sih, A. 1987. Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. - In: Kerfoot, W. C. and Sih, A. (eds), Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ. Press of New England, pp. 203-224.
47. Sih, A., Englund, G. and Wooster, D. 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 350-355.
48. Sih, A. and Wooster, D. E. 1994. Prey behavior, prey dispersal, and predator impacts on stream prey. - Ecology 75: 1199-1207.
49. Soluk, D. A. 1993. Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. - Ecology 74: 219-225.
50. Stephens, D. W. 1985. How important are partial preferences? - Anim. Behav. 33: 667-669.
51. Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. - Princeton Univ. Press.
52. Waters, T. F. 1972. The drift of stream insects. - Annu. Rev. Entom. 17: 253-272.
53. Wooster, D. E. 1998. Amphipod (Gammarus minus) responses to predators and predator impact on amphipod density. - Oecologia 115: 253-259.
54. Wooster, D. and Sih, A. 1995. A review of the drift and activity responses of stream prey to predator presence. - Oikos 73: 3-8.
55. Wooster, D. E., Sih, A. and Englund, G. 1997. Prey dispersal and predator impacts on stream benthic prey. - In: Streit, B., Städler, T. and Lively, C. M. (eds), Evolutionary ecology of freshwater animals: concepts and case studies. Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 89-116.