Selecting forest reserves with a multiobjective spatial algorithm

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 301-309

  Siitonen, Paula ^a   Tanskanen, A ^b   Lehtinen, A ^c  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest planning; Habitat fragmentation; Optimization; Reserve selection; Spatial objectives

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FINLAND; FOREST; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0037992514     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00039-X     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andelman S.J.Fagan W.F.Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 2000 5954-5959
2. Andrén H.Habitat fragmentation and changes in biodiversity Ecol. Bull. 46 1997 171-181
3. Angelstam P.Landscape analysis as a tool for scientific management of biodiversity Ecol. Bull. 46 1997 140-170
4. Balbin L.Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection Biol. Conserv. 66 1993 223-230
5. Briers R.A.Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures Biol. Conserv. 103 2002 77-83
6. Church R.L.Stoms D.M.Davis F.W.Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem Biol. Conserv. 76 1996 105-112
7. Church R.L.Murray A.T.Figueroa M.Barber K.H.Support system development for forest ecosystem management Eur. J. Operational Res. 121 2000 247-258
8. Csuti B.Polasky S.Williams P.H.Pressey R.L.Camm J.D.Kereshaw M.Kiester A.R.Downs B.Hamilton R.Huso M.Sahr K.A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon Biol. Conserv. 80 1997 83-97
9. Esseen P.Renhorn K.Edge effects on an epiphytic lichen in fragmented forests Conserv. Biol. 12 1998 1307-1317
10. Esseen P.-A.Ehnström B.Ericson L.Sjöberg K.Boreal forests Ecol. Bull. 46 1997 16-47
11. Fagan W.F.Cantrell R.S.Cosner C.How habitat edges change species interactions Am. Natural. 153 1999 165-182
12. Ferrier S.Pressey R.L.Barrett T.W.A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement Biol. Conserv. 93 2000 303-325
13. Gustafsson L.Hansson L.Corridors as a conservation tool Ecol. Bull. 46 1997 182-190
14. Haila Y.Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: ecological background, research, and management Ann. Zool. Fennici 31 1994 203-217
15. Hanski, I., 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Hanski I.Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modeling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation Ann. Zool. Fennici 37 2000 271-281
17. Harrison R.L.Toward a theory of inter-refuge corridor design Conserv. Biol. 6 1991 293-295
18. King A.W.With K.A.Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? Ecol. Model. 147 2002 23-39
19. Kirkpatrick J.B.An iterative method for establishing priorities for selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania Biol. Conserv. 25 1983 127-134
20. Kurttila M.The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning-a landscape ecological perspective Forest Ecol. Manage. 142 2001 129-142
21. Kurttila M.Uuttera J.Mykrä S.Kurki S.Pukkala T.Decreasing the fragmentation of old forests in landscapes involving multiple ownership in Finland: economic Forest Ecol. Manage. 5710 2001 1-16
22. Levins R.Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15 1969 237-240
23. Lindenmayer D.B.Margules C.R.Botkin D.B.Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management Conserv. Biol. 14 1999 941-950
24. Lindenmayer D.B.Cunningham R.B.Donnelly C.F.Lesslie R.On the use of landscape surrogates as ecological indicators in fragmented forests Forest Ecol. Manage. 159 2002 203-216
25. Luukkanen, T., 2002. Sapariston alue-ekologinen suunnitelma, Landscape ecological plan of Saparisto. StoraEnso Forest, Imatra, Finland, 37 pp.
26. MacArthur, R.H., Wilson, E.O., 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
27. Margules C.R.Pressey R.L.Systematic conservation planning Nature 405 2000 243-253
28. Margules C.R.Nicholls A.O.Pressey R.L.Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity Biol. Conserv. 43 1988 663-676
29. Nicholls A.O.Margules C.R.An upgraded reserve selection algorithm Biol. Conserv. 64 1993 165-169
30. Nordén B.Larsson K.-H.Basidiospore dispersal in the old-growth forest fungus Phlebia centrifuga (Basidiomycetes) Nordic J. Bot. 20 1999 215-219
31. Noss R.F.Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators Forest Ecol. Manage. 115 1999 135-146
32. Öhman K.Eriksson L.O.Allowing for spatial consideration in long-term forest planning by linking linear programming with simulated annealing Forest Ecol. Manage. 161 2002 221-230
33. Possingham, H., Ball, I., Andelman, S., 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve network. In: Ferson, S., Burgman, M. (Eds.), Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology. Springer, New York, pp. 291-306.
34. Prendergast J.R.Quinn R.M.Lawton J.H.The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves Conserv. Biol. 13 1999 484-492
35. Pressey R.L.Ferrier S.Hager T.C.Woods C.A.Tully S.L.Weinman K.M.How well protected are the forests of north-eastern New South Wales? Analyses of forest environments in relation to formal protection measures, land tenure, and vulnerability to clearing Forest Ecol. Manage. 85 1996 311-333
36. Pressey R.L.Possingham H.P.Day J.R.Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves Biol. Conserv. 80 1997 201-219
37. Rassi, P., Mannerkoski, I., Peltonen, S.-L., Alanen, A., 2000. Second Red Data Book of Finland. Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.
38. Reunanen P.Mönkkönen M.Nikula A.Managing boreal forest landscapes for flying squirrels Conserv. Biol. 14 2000 218-226
39. Rodrigues A.S.L.Gaston K.J.Optimisation in reserve selection procedures-why not? Biol. Conserv. 107 2002 123-129
40. Rodrigues A.S.Cerdeira J.O.Gaston K.J.Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adaptive reserve selection algorithm to more complex conservation problems Ecography 23 2000 565-574
41. Rothley K.D.Designing bioreserve networks to satisfy multiple, conflicting demands Ecol. Appl. 9 1999 741-750
42. Saetersdal M.Line J.M.Birks H.J.How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, Western Norway Biol. Conserv. 66 1993 131-138
43. Saunders D.A.Hobbs R.J.Margules C.R.Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review Conserv. Biol. 5 1991 18-32
44. Shafer G.L.National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements Landsc. Urban Plan. 44 1999 123-153
45. Siitonen P.Tanskanen A.Lehtinen A.Method for selection of old-forest reserves Conserv. Biol. 16 (5) 2002 1398-1408
46. Sprugel D.G.Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: what is "natural" vegetation in a changing environment? Biol. Conserv. 58 1991 1-18
47. Virkkala, R., Toivonen, H., 1999. Maintaining Biological Diversity in Finnish Forests. The Finnish Environment 278. The Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.