Method for selection of old-forest reserves

Conservation Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1398-1408

  Siitonen, Paula ^a   Tanskanen, Antti ^b   Lehtinen, Antti ^c  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CONSERVATION; CONSERVATION PLANNING; FOREST; NATURE RESERVE;

EID: 0036795396     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00322.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrén, H. 1997. Habitat fragmentation and changes in biodiversity. Ecological Bulletins 46:171-181.
2. Angelstam, P. 1997. Landscape analysis as a tool for scientific management of biodiversity. Ecological Bulletins 46:140-170.
3. Angelstam, P., and B. Pettersson. 1997. Principles of present Swedish forest biodiversity management. Ecological Bulletins 46:191-203.
4. Church, R. L., D. M. Stoms, and F. W. Davis. 1996. Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 76:105-112.
5. Church, R. L., A. T. Murray, M. Figueroa, and K. H. Barber. 2000. Support system development for forest ecosystem management. European Journal of Operational Research 121:247-258.
6. Csuti, B., S. Polasky, P. H. Williams, R. L. Pressey, J. D. Camm, M. Kereshaw, A. R. Kiester, B. Downs, R. Hamilton, M. Huso, and K. Sahr. 1997. A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation 80:83-97.
7. Esseen, P-A., B. Ehnström, L. Ericson, and K. Sjöberg. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46:16-47.
8. Ferrier, S., R. L. Pressey, and T. W. Barrett. 2000. A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biological Conservation 93:303-325.
9. Gustafsson, L., and L. Hansson. 1997. Corridors as a conservation tool. Ecological Bulletins 46:182-190.
10. Haila, Y. 1994. Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: ecological background, research, and management. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31:203-217.
11. Haila, Y., I. K. Hanski, J. Niemelä, P. Punttila, S. Raivio, and H. Tukia. 1994. Forestry and the boreal fauna: matching management with natural forest dynamics. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31:187-203.
12. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Hanski, I. 2000. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modeling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Annales Zoologici Fennici 37:271-281.
14. Hansson, L., and T.-B. Larsson. 1997. Conservation of boreal environments: a completed research program and a new paradigm. Ecological Bulletins 46:9-15.
15. Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest. The University Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Harrison, R. L. 1991. Toward a theory of inter-refuge corridor design. Conservation Biology 6:293-295.
17. Karvonen, L. 2001. Guidelines for landscape ecological forest planning. Forestry publications of Metsähallitus 96. Finnish Forest and Park Service, Vantaa.
18. Keränen, E., M. Kaukonen, K. Louhisalmi, K. Sarajärvi, A. Tyni, P. Virnes, and A. Viikanen. 2000. Landscape ecological plan for state-owned forests in Metsäkylä-Jokijärvi. Report. Finnish Forests and Park Service, Vantaa (in Finnish).
19. Kirkpatrick, J. B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25:127-134.
20. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
21. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
22. Margules, C. R., A. O. Nicholls, and R. L. Pressey. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43:663-676.
23. Metsähallitus. 1998. Environmental guidelines to practical forest management. Forest and Park Service, Edita, Helsinki.
24. Mladenoff, D., T. Crow, and J. Pastor. 1994. Applying principles of landscape design and management to integrate old-growth forest enhancement and commodity use. Conservation Biology 8:752-762.
25. Nicholls, A. O., and C. R. Margules. 1993. An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation 64:165-169.
26. Nordén, B., and K.-H. Larsson. 1999. Basidiospore dispersal in the old-growth forest fungus Phlebia centrifuga (Basidiomycetes). Nordic Journal of Botany 20:215-219.
27. Pimm, S. L., and J. H. Lawton. 1998. Planning for biodiversity. Science 279:2068-2069.
28. Possingham, H., I. Ball, and S. Andelman. 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve network. Pages 291-306 in S. Ferson and M. Burgman, editors. Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springler-Verlag, New York.
29. Prendergast, J. R., R. M. Quinn, and J. H. Lawton. 1999. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology 13:484-492.
30. Pressey, R. L., and A. O. Nicholls. 1989. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biological Conservation 50:199-218.
31. Pressey, R. L., S. Ferrier, T. C. Hager, C. A. Woods, S. L. Tully, and K. M. Weinman. 1996a. How well protected are the forests of north-eastern New South Wales? Analyses of forest environments in relation to formal protection measures, land tenure, and vulnerability, to clearing. Forest Ecology and Management 85:311-333.
32. Pressey, R. L., H. P. Possingham, and C. R. Margules. 1996b. Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much? Biological Conservation 76:259-267.
33. Pressey, R. L., H. P. Possingham, and J. R. Day. 1997. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation 80:201-219.
34. Pukkala, T., and J. Kangas. 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest management planning. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8:560-570.
35. Rassi, P., I. Mannerkoski, S.-L. Peltonen, and A. Alanen. 2000. 2nd red data book of Finland. Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.
36. Saetersdal, M., J. M. Line, and H. J. Birks. 1993. How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, Western Norway. Biological Conservation 66:131-138.
37. Saunders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5:18-32.
38. Shafer, G. L. 1990. Nature reserves: island theory and conservation practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
39. Siitonen, P., editor. 1999. Assessment of forest biodiversity. Stand structure and species. Nature protection publications, series A 103. Finnish Forest and Park Service, Vantaa (in Finnish with English abstract).
40. Spellerberg, I. 1994. Evaluation and assessment for conservation. Chapman & Hall, London.
41. Virkkala, R., and H. Toivonen. 1999. Maintaining biological diversity in Finnish forests. The Finnish environment 278. The Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.
42. Williams, P., D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphiries, and R. Pressey. 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10:155-174.