A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon

Biological Conservation

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 83-97

  Csuti, Blair ^a   Polasky, Stephen ^b   Williams, Paul H ^c   Pressey, Robert L ^d   Camm, Jeffrey D ^e   Kershaw, Melanie ^f   Kiester, A Ross ^g   Downs, Brian ^h   Hamilton, Richard ^e   Huso, Manuela ^b   Sahr, Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^d NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^g PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^h SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESERVE SELECTION; TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE;

USA, OREGON;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0031107135     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00068-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ackery, P. R. & Vane-Wright, R. I. (1984). Milkweed butterflies, their cladistics and biology. Cornell University Press, New York.
2. Bedward, M., Pressey, R. L. & Keith, D. A. (1992). A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol. Conserv., 62, 115-125.
3. Camm, J. D., Polasky, S., Solow, A. & Csuti, B. (1996). A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biol. Conserv., 78, 353-358.
4. Church, R. L., Stoms, D. M. & Davis, F. W. (1996). Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol. Conserv.
5. Cocks, K. D. & Baird, I. A. (1989). Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biol. Conserv., 49, 113-130.
6. Downs, B. T. & Camm, J. D. (1996). An exact algorithm for the maximal set coverage problem. Nav. Res. Log, 43, 435-461.
7. Fisher, M. L. (1981). The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Manage. Sci., 27(1), 1-18.
8. Hunter, M. L., Jr. & Hutchinson, A. (1994). The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conserv. Biol., 8, 1163-1165.
9. Kershaw, M., Williams, P. H. & Mace, G. C. (1994). Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodiv. Conserv., 3, 354-372.
10. Kirkpatrick, J. B. (1983). An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv., 25, 127-134.
11. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671-680.
12. Lawton, J. H., Prendergast, J. R. & Eversham, B. C. (1994). The numbers and spatial distributions of species: analyses of British data. In Systematics and conservation evaluation, ed. P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries & R. I. Vane-Wright. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 177-195.
13. Lessica, P. & Allendorf, F. W. (1995). When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv. Biol., 9, 753-760.
14. Lombard, A. T., Nicholls, A. O. & August, P. V. (1995). Where should nature reserves be located in South Africa? A snake's perspective. Conserv. Biol., 9, 363-372.
15. Margules, C. R., Creswell, I. D. & Nicholls, A. O. (1994). A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In Systematics and conservation evaluation, ed. P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries & R. I. Vane-Wright. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 327-350.
16. Margules, C. R., Nicholls, A. O. & Pressey, R. L. (1988). Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biol. Conserv., 43, 63-76.
17. May, R. M. (1990). Taxonomy as destiny. Nature, Lond., 347, 129-130.
18. Nicholls, A. O. & Margules, C. R. (1993). An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv., 64, 165-169.
19. Noss, R. F. (1987). From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol. Conserv., 41, 11-37.
20. Possingham, H., Day, J., Goldfinch, M. & Salzborn, F. (1993). The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation. In Proc. 12th Aust. Oper. Res. Conf., ed. D. Sutton, E. Cousins & C. Pearce. Adelaide University, Adelaide, pp. 536-545.
21. Prendergast, J. R., Quinn, R. M., Lawton, J. H., Eversham, B. C. & Gibbons, D. W. (1993). Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, Lond., 335-337.
22. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical Recipes in C. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Pressey, R. L. (1994). Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems. Conserv. Biol., 8, 662-668.
24. Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I. & Williams, P. H. (1993). Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 124-128.
25. Pressey, R. L., Johnson, I. R. & Wilson, P. D. (1994). Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiv. Conserv., 3, 242-262.
26. Pressey, R. L. & Nicholls, A. O. (1989). Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biol. Conserv., 50, 263-278.
27. Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P. & Margules, C. R. (1996a). Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? Biol. Conserv., 76, 259-267.
28. Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P. & Day, J. R. (1996b). Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol. Conserv.
29. Rebelo, A. G. (1994). Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. In Botanical diversity in southern Africa, ed. B. J. Huntley. National Biological Institute, Pretoria.
30. Rebelo, A. G. & Seigfried, W. R. (1990). Protection of fynbos vegetation: ideal and real-world options. Biol. Conserv., 54, 15-31.
31. Saetersdal, M., Line, J. M. & Birks, H. J. B. (1993). How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selections: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands Western Norway. Biol. Conserv., 66, 131-138.
32. Scott, J. M. & Csuti, B. (1997). Gap analysis for biodiversity survey and maintenance. In Biodiversity II: Understanding and protecting our biological resources, ed. M. L. Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson, & E. O. Wilson. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, pp. 321-340.
33. Scott, J. M., Csuti, B. & Smith, K. A. (1990). Playing Noah while paying the devil. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer., 71, 156-159.
34. Scott, J. M., Davis, F. & Csuti, B. (1993). Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Willd. Monogr., 123, 1-41.
35. Sharrock, J. T. R. (1976). The atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland. Calton, T. & A. D. Poyser.
36. Udvardy, M. D. F. (1969). Dynamic zoogeography. Van Norstrand Reinhold, New York.
37. Udvardy, M. D. F. (1981). An overview of grid-based atlas works in ornithology. Stud. Avian Biol., 6, 103-109.
38. Underhill, L. G. (1994). Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biol. Conserv., 70, 85-87.
39. Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. (1991). What to protect? - Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv., 55, 235-254.
40. White, D., Kimerling, A. J. & Overton, W. S. (1992). Cartographic and geometric components of a global sampling design for environmental monitoring. Cart. Geog. Info. Sys., 19, 5-22.
41. Williams, P. H. (1994). WORLDMAP: priority areas for biodiversity. London (privately distributed).
42. Williams, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. (1994). Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biol. Conserv., 67, 211-217.
43. Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C. & Pressey, R. (1996). A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots and complementary areas for conserving diversity using British birds. Conserv. Biol., 10, 155-174
44. Williams, P. H. & Humphries, C. J. (1994). Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness, and endemism in conservation. In Systematics and conservation evaluation, ed. P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries & R. I. Vane-Wright. Syst. Assoc. Spec. Vol., 50. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
45. Williams, P. H., Vane-Wright, R. I. & Humphries, C. J. (1993). Measuring biodiversity for choosing conservation areas. In Hymenoptera and biodiversity, ed. J. LaSalle & I. Gauld. CAB International, Wallingford.
46. Willis, C. K., Lombard, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Heydenrych, B. J. & Burgers, C. J. (1996). Reserve systems for limestone endemic flora of the Cape Lowland fynbos: iterative versus linear programming techniques. Biol. Conserv., 77, 53-62.