Environment-independent 14-helix formation in short β-peptides: Striking a balance between shape control and functional diversity

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 19, 2003, Pages 5592-5593

  Raguse, Tami L ^a   Lai, Jonathan R ^a   Gellman, Samuel H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ENVIRONMENT; HYDROGEN BOND; PH;

CIRCULAR DICHROISM; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0037959630     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0341485     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. (a) Seebach, D.; Matthews, J. L. Chem. Commun. 1997, 2015.
2. (b) Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219.
3. Seebach, D.; Abele, S.; Schreiber, J. V.; Martinoni, B.; Nussbaum, A. K.; Schild, H.; Schulz, H.; Hennecke, H.; Woessner, R.; Bitsch, F. Chimia 1998, 52, 734.
4. (a) Appella, D. H.; Barchi, J. J.; Durell, S. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2309.
5. (b) Woll, M. G.; Fisk, J. D.; LePlae, P. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12447 and references therein.
6. Selected examples: (a) Werder, M.; Hausre, H.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1774.
7. (b) Hamuro, Y.; Schneider, J. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12200.
8. (c) Porter, E. A.; Wang, X.; Lee, H.-S.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. Nature 2000, 404, 565.
9. (d) Gademann, K.; Kimmerlin, T.; Hoyer, D.; Seebach, D. J. Med. Chem. 2001. 44, 2461.
10. (e) Liu, D.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7553.
11. (f) Patch, J. A.; Barron, A. E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 872.
12. (a) Appella, D. H.; LePlae, P. R.; Raguse, T. L.; Gellman, S. H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4766.
13. (b) Wipf, P.; Wang, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8747.
14. Guichard, G.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 187.
15. (a) Abele, S.; Guichard, G.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 2141.
16. (b) Gung, B. W.; Zou, D.; Stalcup, A. M.; Cottrell, C. E. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2176.
17. Cheng, R. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5162.
18. Arvidsson, P. I.; Rueping, M.; Seebach, D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2001, 649.
19. 3-residues with opposite configuration relative to those used here; therefore, our molecules display inverse CD signals.
20. Glattli, A.; Daura, X.; Seebach, D.; van Gunsteren, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124. 12972.
21. Jeener, J.; Meier, B. H.; Bachmann, P.; Ernst, R. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 4546.
22. 275) versus (radial distance)2 data resulted in molecular weight estimates that were consistent with monomeric 3.
23. (a) Berkessel, A.; Glaubitz, K.; Lex, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2948.
24. (b) Schinnerl, M.; Murray, J. K.; Langenhan, J. L.; Gellman, S. H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 721.