The ligand effect on the hydrolytic reactivity of Zn(II) complexes toward phosphate diesters

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 3943-3949

  Bonfá, Lodovico ^a   Gatos, Maddalena ^a   Mancin, Fabrizio ^a   Tecilla, Paolo ^b   Tonellato, Umberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYPROPYL 2 NITROPHENYL PHOSPHATE; BIS(4 NITROPHENYL PHOSPHATE); LEWIS ACID; LIGAND; ORGANOPHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC COMPLEX; ZINC ION;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; COMPLEX FORMATION; DISSOCIATION; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; PH; PKA; REACTION ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; TRANSESTERIFICATION;

EID: 0037945185     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic034139x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Williams, N. H.; Takasaki, B.; Wall, M.; Chin, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 485-493. Different half-life values for the hydrolysis of DNA and RNA have been reported in the literature and are discussed in the reference.
2. (a) Jedrzejas, M. J.; Setlow, P. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 608-618.
3. (b) Cowan, J. A. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1067-1087.
4. (c) Wilcox, D. E. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2435-2458.
5. (d) Sträter, N.; Lipscomb, W. N.; Klabunde, T.; Krebs, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2024-2055.
6. (e) Serpersu, E. H.; Shortle, D.; Mildvan, A. S. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 1289-1300.
7. Selected reviews: (a) Molenveld, P.; Engbersen, J. F. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 75-86.
8. (b) Krämer, R. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 182, 243-261.
9. (c) Hegg, E. L.; Burstyn, J. N. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 173, 133-165.
10. (d) Kimura, E.; Koike, T. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1495-1500.
11. (e) Morrow, J. R. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 1997, 33, 561-592.
12. (f) Chin, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 145-152.
13. (g) Hendry, P.; Sargeson, A. M. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 38, 201-258.
14. Hendry, P.; Sargeson, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2521-2527.
15. (a) Chin, J.; Zou, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 110, 223-225.
16. (b) Chin, J.; Banaszczyk, M.; Jubian, V.; Zou, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 186-190.
17. (a) Deck, M. K.; Tseng, T. A.; Burstyn, J. N. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 669-677.
18. (b) Hegg, E. L.; Mortimore, S. H.; Cheung, C. L.; Huyett, J. E.; Powell, D. R.; Burstyn, J. N. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 2961-2968.
19. (c) Deal, K. A.; Burstyn, J. N. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 2792-2798.
20. (d) Deal, K. A.; Hengge, A. C.; Burstyn, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1713-1718.
21. (e) Itoh, T.; Isada, H.; Usui, Y.; Fujii, Y. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 283, 51-60.
22. (a) Itoh, T.; Fujii, Y.; Tada, T.; Yuzo, Y.; Hisada, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 1265-1274.
23. (b) Fujii, Y.; Itoh, T.; Onodera, K.; Tada, T. Chem. Lett. 1995, 305-306.
24. (c) Koike, T.; Kimura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8935-8941.
25. Brown, D. A.; Usher, D. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 6558-6564.
26. Bowen, T.; Planalp, R. P.; Brechbiel, M. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 807-810.
27. Hegetschweiler, K.; Emi, I.; Schneider, W.; Schmalle, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 97-105.
28. Weber, M.; Hegetschweiler, K.; Kuppert, D.; Gramlich, V. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 859-868.
29. Martell, A. E.; Motekaitis, R. J. Determination and Use of Stability Constants, 2nd ed.; VCH: New York, 1992.
30. Bates, R. G. Solute-Solvent Interactions; Coetzer, I. F., Ritchie, C. D., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1969.
31. Hegetschweiler, K.; Gramilch, V.; Ghisletta, M.; Samaras, H. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2341-2346.
32. Zompa, L. J. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2531-2536.
33. a value of 8.1 at 25 °C can be estimated on the basis of the temperature dependence of similar systems (see refs 7b and 19b).
34. -4 due to the solubility problem of the system.
35. See for example: (a) Fritsky, I. O.; Ott, R.; Pritzkow, H.; Krämer, R. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1221-1231.
36. (b) Mikkola, S.; Stenman, E.; Nurmi, K.; Yousefi-Salakdeh, E.; Strömberg, R.; Lönnberg, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 1619-1625.
37. (c) Molenveld, P.; Engbersen, J. F. J.; Kooijman, H.; Spek. A. L.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6726-6737.
38. (d) Liu, S. Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1107-1110.
39. (e) Kalesse, M.; Loos, A. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1996, 935-939.
40. (a) Young, M. J.; Wahnon, D.; Hynes, R. C.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9441-9447.
41. (b) Kimura, E.; Nakamura, I.; Koike, T.; Shionoya, M.; Kodama, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4764-4771.
42. Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry; Gold, V., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1967.
43. Kirby, A. J.; Younas, M. J. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970, 510-513. The value was assigned by the authors to a general base mechanism, but it is considerably lower than that usually found for general base reactions, see ref 20.
44. Jones, D. R.; Lindoy, L. F.; Sargeson, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7327-7336.
45. A possible different explanation for the small deuterium kinetic solvent isotope effect has been suggested by one of the reviewers: it involves the mutually opposite effects of a better general base ability of the metal bound OD and a lower acidity of the substrate OD group in a general base catalysis mechanism.