Travels towards Problem Based Learning in Medical Education (VPBL)

Instructional Science

Volumn 31, Issue 4-5, 2003, Pages 231-253

  Bowdish, Bruce E ^a   Chauvin, Sheila W ^a   Kreisman, Norman ^a   Britt, Mike ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance learning; Distant learning; Learner control; Learning; Medical education; PBL; Problem based learning; Situated cognition; Situated learning; Web based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037829595     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024625707592     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature of its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine 68(1): 52-81.
2. Alexander, P.A., Kulikowich, J.M. & Jetton, T.L. (1994). The role of subject matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear tests. Review of Educational Research 64: 201-252.
3. Barab, S.A., Bowdish, B.E., Young, M.F. & Owen, S.V. (1996). Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches. Instructional Science 24: 377-395.
4. Barrows, H. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education 20: 481-486.
5. Barrows, H. (1988). The Tutorial Process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
6. Bloom, B.S. (1976). Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Bonwell, C.C. & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. ED419529.
8. Bowdish, B.E., Chauvin, S.W. & Vigh, S. (1998). Comparing Student Learning Outcomes in Hypermedia and Analog Assisted Lectures (HAL & AAL). IR019153, 143, 150.
9. Bowdish, B.E., Chauvin, S.W. & Vigh, S. (2000, April). Discriminating the effect of Hypermedia-assisted lectures and analog-assisted lectures on students' learning across three years: Phase II. A paper presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
10. Bowdish, B.E., Harrison, J. & Chauvin, S.W. (1997, October). How does instructional technology influence student achievement and their learning environment? Presentation at the Association of American Medical Colleges annual meeting, Washington, D.C.
11. Bridges, E.M. (1992). Problem-based learning for administrators (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EA 023 722).
12. Bruner, J.S. (1973). Beyond the Information Given. New York: Norton.
13. Camp, G. (1996). Problem-Based Learning: A Paradigm Shift or a Passing Fad? MEO 1996; 1:2. http://www.med-ed-online.org/f0000003.htm
14. Campanizzi, J.A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computer-assisted instruction sequence. AEDS Journal 12: 21-30.
15. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Board 64: 723-733.
16. Chauvin, S.W. & Bowdish, B.E. (1998). Initial development of an instrument for obtaining students' perceptions of effective learning environments. Association of American Medical Colleges annual meeting, Washington, D.C.
17. Colliver, J.A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine 75: 259-266.
18. Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
19. Cronbach, L.J. & Snow, R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington.
20. Dalton, D.W. (1990). The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 17: 8-16.
21. Dalton, D.W. & Hannafin, M.J. (1985). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the self-esteem and achievement of remedial junior high school students: An exploratory study. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal: 172-182.
22. Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1990). The Systematic Design of Instruction, 3rd edition. Scott, Foresman and Company.
23. Driscoll, M. (1998). Web-Based Training: Using Technology to Design Adult Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S. & Chauvin, S.W. (1991). System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR): Annotated Guide to Teaching and Learning (Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Certification Program Form). Second Revision. College of Education, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
25. Feldman, K.A. & Paulsen, M.B., eds (1994). Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
26. Fernald, P.S., Chiseri, M.J. & Lawson, D.W. (1975). Systematic manipulation of student pacing, the perfection requirement, and contact with a teaching assistant in an introductory psychology course. Teaching of Psychology 2: 147-151.
27. Fowler, J.F. (1983). Use of computer-assisted instruction in introductory management science. Journal of Experimental Education 52: 22-26.
28. Fraser, B.J., Treagust, D.F., Williamson, J.C. & Tobin, K.G. (1987). Validation and application of college and university classroom environment inventory (CUCEI). In B.J. Fraser, ed., The Study of Learning Environments, Volume 2. Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
29. Gay, G. (1986). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 225-227.
30. Gibson, J.J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Original work published 1979), Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Goetzfried, L. & Hannafin, M. (1985). The effect of the locus of CA1 control strategies on the learning of mathematics rules. American Educational Research Journal 22: 273-278.
32. Gray, S.H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 14: 54-56.
33. Gray, S.H. (1988). Sequence control menus and CA1: A follow-up study. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 15: 57-60.
34. Hak, T. & McGuire, P. (2000). Group process: The black box of studies of problem-based learning. Academic Medicine 75: 769-772.
35. Hannafin, M. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development 7: 6-10.
36. Higginbotham-Wheat, N. (1990). Learner control: When does it work? Proceedings of the Annual Convention of Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 251-258.
37. Hmelo, C.E. & Evenson, D.H. (2000). Introduction. In D.H. Evenson & C.E. Hmelo, eds, Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
38. Hoffman, B. & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science 25: 97-115.
39. Holmes, E.H., Robson, E.H. & Steward, A.P. (1985). Learner control in computer-assisted learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 1: 99-107.
40. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A. (1991). ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
41. Judd, W.A., Bunderson, C.V. & Bessent, E.W. (1970). An investigation of the effects of LC in CA1 prerequisite math. Mathematics Technical Report No. 5.
42. Kamin, C., Deterding, R. & Wade, T. (1998). Project LIVE. Presentation at the annual Slice of Life Conference. Tampa, Florida.
43. Kamin, C.S., O'Sullivan, P.S., Younger, M. & Deterding, R. (2001). Measuring critical thinking in problem-based learning discourse. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 13(1): 27-35.
44. Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Kinzie, M. (1988). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. Educational Technology Research and Technology 38: 1-21.
46. Kinzie, M., Sullivan, H. & Berdel, R. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 299-303.
47. Kinzie, M., Sullivan, H., Beyard, K.C., Berdel, R. & Hass, N.S. (1987, April). Learner versus program control in computer assisted instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
48. Knowles, M.E. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education, pp. 57-58. Cambridge: Prentice Hall.
49. Lahey, G.F. (1976). Learner control of lesson strategy: A model for PLATO IV system lessons. San Diego: Navy Personal Research and Development (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 125-543).
50. Lee, S. & Lee Y. H. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry programs: for acquisition or review? Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 491-498.
51. Lee, S. & Wong, S.C. (1989). Adaptive program vs. learner control strategy on computer aided learning of gravimetric stoichiometry problems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 21: 367-379.
52. Lepper, M.R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist 40: 1-18.
53. Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Loup, K.S., Ellett, C.D., Culross, R. & Evans, R.L. (1994). Initial development and piloting of a learning centered, classroom-based assessment and consultation system: New perspectives on the rhetoric of improving instruction in higher education settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
55. Mager, R.F. & Clark, C. (1963). Explorations in student-controlled instruction. Psychological Reports 13:71-76.
56. McCann, P.H. (1981). Learning strategies and computer-based instruction. Computers and Education 5:133-140.
57. McCann, P.H., Lahey, G.F. & Hurlock, R.F. (1973). A comparison of student option versus program controlled CA1 training (SRR 73-17). Navy Personnel and Training Research Lab, San Diego.
58. Merrill, M.D. (1983). Component display theory. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional-design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Merrill, M.D. (1975). Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions. AV Communications Review 23: 217-226.
60. Merrill, M.D. (1984). What is learner control? Instructional development: The state of the art, II. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 905).
61. Meyer, R. (1976). Differences in breadth of transfer due to advance organizers and subject control of frame sequence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.
62. Milheim, W.D. (1989). The effects of pacing and sequence control in an interactive video lesson. ETTI 37: 7-19.
63. Newkirk, R.L. (1973). A comparison of learner control and machine control strategies for computer-assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 10: 82-91.
64. Norman, G.R. & Schmidt, H.G. (1992). Academic Medicine 67(9): 557-565.
65. Park, O. & Tennyson, R.D. (1980). Adaptive design strategies for selecting number and presentation order of examples in coordinate concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 386-370.
66. Pollock, J.C. & Sullivan, H.J. (1990). practice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 15: 251-260.
67. Reigeluth, C.M. & Stein, F.S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional-design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Reiser, R.A. (1984). Reducing student procrastination in a personalized system of instruction course. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 32: 41-49.
69. Reiser, R.A. & Sullivan, H.J. (1977). Effects of self-pacing and instructor- pacing in a PSI course. Journal of Educational Research 71: 8-12.
70. Ritchie, D.C., Norris, P. & Chestnutt, G. (1995). Incorporating technology into problem-based learning. In D.A. Willis, B. Robin and J. Willis, eds, Technology and Teacher Education Annual. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
71. Ross, S.N. (1984). Matching the lesson to the student: alternative adaptive designs for individualized learning systems. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 11: 42-48.
72. Ross, S.N. & Rakow, E.A. (1981). Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 745-753.
73. Ross, S.N., Rakow, E.A. & Bush, A.J. (1980). Instructional adaptation for self-managed learning systems. Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 312-320.
74. Sasscer, N.F. & Moore, D.N. (1984). A study of the relationship between learner-control patterns and course completion in computer-assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 21: 28-33.
75. Savery, J. (1994, May). What is problem-based learning? Paper presented at the meeting of the Professors of Instructional Design and Technology, Indiana State University, Bloomington, IN.
76. Savery, J.R. & Duffy, T.M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology 35(5): 31-37.
77. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27(2): 4-13.
78. Shyu, H.Y. & Brown, S.W. (1993) A study of interactive learning: IVS and diagrams. Computers in the Schools 9(4): 71-80.
79. Shyu, H.Y. & Brown, S.W. (1993, December). Learner control in multimedia instruction: The effects on learning a procedural task. Presented at the 1993 International Conference on Computers in Education: Applications of Intelligent Computer Technologies. Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. (also published in proceedings).
80. Shyu, H.Y. & Brown, S.W. (1995) Learner-Control: The effects on learning a procedural task during computer-based videodisc instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media 22(3): 217-231.
81. Steinberg, E.R. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 3: 84-90.
82. Sutherland, T.E. & Bonwell, C.C., eds (1996). Using Active Learning in College Classes: A Range of Options for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83. Tabachnick B.G. & Fidell L.S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics, 23rd ed. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
84. Tennyson, R.D. & Buttrey, R. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 28: 169-176.
85. Tennyson, R.D. & Rothen, W. (1979). Management of computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 5: 126-134.
86. Tobias, S. (1976). Achievement treatment interaction. Review of Educational Research 46: 61-74.
87. Tobias, S. (1981). Adapting instruction to individual differences among students. Educational Psychologist 16: 111-120.
88. Vernon, D.T.A. & Blake, R.L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine 68(7): 550-563.
89. Wilcox, W.C., Richards, B.F., Merrill, N.D., Christensen, D. & Rosenvall, J. (1978). Learner control of the number of instances in a rule-using task (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 201 531).
90. Wilkerson, L. & Gijselaers, W.H., eds (1996). Bring Problem-based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
91. Young, M.F. (1994). Instructional design for anchored instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(1): 43-58.