New urban rail systems: A policy-based technique to make them more successful

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 151-164

  Mackett, Roger ^a   Sutcliffe, Ela Babalik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Light rail; Performance; Policy; Success; Urban rail

Indexed keywords

PLANNING METHOD; POLICY ANALYSIS; RAILWAY TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 0037800321     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00003-6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Babalik, E., 2000. Urban Rail Systems: A Planning Framework To Increase Their Success. Thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Ph.D
2. Bakker J.J. LRT lessons that can be learned from Edmonton and Calgary Transportation Research Record 1361 1992 39 46
3. Bernick M. Cervero R. Transit villages in the 21st Century 1997 McGraw-Hill New York
4. Cani, R., 1997. Regenerating urban centres through integrated land use and transport planning policies: lessons from the USA, paper presented at the 22nd European Transport Forum. Proceedings of Seminar C: Policy, Planning and Sustainability, PTRC, London, pp. 251-261
5. Cervero R. Landis J. Twenty years of the bay area rapid transit system: land-use and development impacts Transportation Research 31A 1997 309 333
6. Dabinett G. Gore T. Haywood R. Lawless P. Transport investment and regeneration, Sheffield: 1992-1997 Transport Policy 6 1999 123 134
7. Davoudi, S., Gilliard, A., Healey, P., Pullen, B., Raybould, S., Robinson, F., Silcock, D., Usher, D., Wymer, C., 1993. The longerterm e.ects of the Tyne and Wear Metro. Transport Research Laboratory, Contractor Report 357.
8. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, 2001. Transport Statistics Great Britain, The Stationery Office London, 2001
9. Dueker K.J. Bianco M.J. Light rail transit impacts in Portland: the first 10 years Transportation Research Record 1685 1999 171 180
10. Dunphy, R.T., 1997. Review of recent American Light Rail experiences. Proceedings of Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit, Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings, vol. 8. pp. 104-113
11. East-West Gateway Co-ordinating Council, 1996. Where we stand: the strategic assessment of the St Louis Region.
12. Edwards M. Mackett R.L. Developing new public transport systems: an irrational decision-making process Transport Policy 3 1996 225 239
13. Glick F. Light rail transit and effective land use planning: Portland, Sacramento, and San Diego Transportation Research Record 1361 1992 75 80
14. Haywood, R., 1998. South Yorkshire Supertram: final report on planning applications and land-use change research. Working paper, Sheffield Hallam University, School of Urban and Regional Studies
15. Haywood R. South Yorkshire Supertram: its property impacts and their implications for integrated land use-transportation planning Planning Practice and Research 14 1999 277 299
16. Haywood P. South Yorkshire Supertram--some myths exploded The Transport Economist 26 3 1999 1 12
17. Heseltine P.M. Mulley C. Longer-term benefits of the Tyne and Wear Metro Transportation Planning Systems 1 1993 47 55
18. Hubbell, J., Colquhoun, D., Bolger, D., Morrall, J., 1997. Light rail transit in Calgary, 1981-1995: a retrospective review. Proceedings of Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit, Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings vol. 8. pp. 15-27
19. Kain J.F. Choosing the wrong technology: or how to spend billions and reduce transit use Journal of Advanced Transportation 21 1988 197 213
20. Khasnabis S. Land-use and transit integration and transit use incentives Transportation Research Record 1618 1998 39 47
21. Knowles R.D. Transport impacts of Greater Manchester's MetroLink Light Rail system Journal of Transport Geography 4 1996 1 14
22. Knowles, R.D., Fairweather, E.A., 1994. The 'after' rail user survey and the impact of MetroLink. Working Paper 12, University of Salford, Department of Geography
23. Lawless P. Transport investment and urban regeneration in a provincial city: Sheffield, 1992-96 Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17 1999 211 226
24. Loukaitou-Sideris A. Banerjee T. The Blue Line blues: why the vision of transit village may not materialize despite impressive growth in transit ridership Journal of Urban Design 5 2000 101 125
25. Mackett R.L. Edwards M. The impact of new urban public transport systems: will the expectations be met? Transportation Research 32A 1998 231 245
26. Parkinson T. Rail transit performance Transportation Research Record 1361 1992 47 52
27. Pickrell, D.H., 1990. Urban rail transit projects: forecast versus actual ridership and costs. US Department of Transportation, Washington DC
28. Pickrell D.H. A desire named streetcar: fantasy and fact in rail transit planning Journal of the American Planning Association 58 1992 158 176
29. Richmond J.E.D. The mythical conceptions of rail transit in Los Angeles Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 15 1998 294 320
30. Richmond, J.E.D., 1998b. New rail transit investments--a review: summary paper. Taubman Centre, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University and MIT Cooperative Mobility Research Program
31. Smith D.M. Atlanta: Metropolis of the new south Boal F.W. Royle S.A. North America: A Geographical Mosaic 1999 208 212 Arnold Publishers
32. Taplin M. A world of trams and urban transit Light Rail and Modern Tramway 60 718, Supplement 1997 1 8
33. Taplin, M., 2002. A world of trams and urban transit--updated, obtainable from the World Wide Web at http://www.lrta.org/world/worldind.html.
34. Transportation Research Board Transit and Urban Form. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 16 1996 National Academy Press Washington DC
35. Wachs M. Learning from Los Angeles: transport, urban form, and air quality Transportation 20 1993 329 354
36. Walmsley D. Perrett K. The Effects of Rapid Transit on Public Transport and Urban Development 1992 HMSO London
37. Warren W.D. Why success in St Louis? Transport News 180 1995 22 26