Transport investment and regeneration. Sheffield: 1992-1997

Transport Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 123-134

  Dabinett, G ^a   Gore, T ^a   Haywood, R ^a   Lawless, P ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Investment; Regeneration; Urban

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; URBAN RENEWAL;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032709003     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(99)00013-X     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alcock, P., Craig, G., Lawless, P., Pearson, S., Robinson, D., 1998. Inclusive regeneration: a report to the department of environment, Transport and the Regions, Sheffield. The Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.
2. Banister D. Transport Planning. 1994;Spon, London.
3. Banister D. Transport and Urban Development. 1995;Spon, London.
4. Berechman J. Transport infrastructure investment and economic development. Banister D. Transport and Urban Development. 1995;17 Spon, London.
5. Cervero R. Light rail transit and urban development. Journal of American Planning Association. 50:1984;133-147.
6. Commission of the European Communities, 1998. Developing the Citizens Network. COM, 431 Final. Brussels, CEC.
7. Congdon P. The interdependence of geographic migration with job and housing mobility in London. Regional Studies. 22:1988;81-93.
8. Crocker, S., 1996. Place image, marketing and infrastructure investment. Supertram Impact Series Paper No. 35. Sheffield, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.
9. Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy. 1994;HMSO, London.
10. Department of the Environment, Department of Transport, 1994. Transport, PPG13, Department of the Environment, London.
11. Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund Round 2. 1996;HMSO, London.
12. Department of the Environment, 1997a. Partners in Regeneration. The Challenge Fund, Bidding Guidance, 1, Department of the Environment, London.
13. Department of the Environment, 1997b. UK Round Table on Sustainable Development. Second Annual Report, Department of the Environment, London.
14. DETR, 1997a. Regeneration Programmes: The Way Forward. DETR, London.
15. Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund Round 4: Supplementary Guidance. 1997;HMSO, London.
16. DETR, 1998. A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone. Cm. 3950, The Stationery Office, London.
17. Department of Transport, 1978. Report of the Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment, Chairman Sir George Leitch. HMSO, London.
18. National Road Traffic Forecasts (Great Britain). 1989;HMSO, London.
19. Roads for Prosperity. 1989;HMSO, London.
20. Paying for Better Motorways: Issues for Discussion Cmnd 2200. 1993;HMSO, London.
21. Transport - the way forward. The Government's Response to the Transport Debate. 1996;HMSO, London.
22. Diamond D., Spence N. Infrastructure and Industrial Costs in British Industry. 1989;HMSO, London.
23. Elias P., White M. Recruitment in Local Labour Markets: Employer and Employee Perspectives. RP-86:1991;Employment Department, London.
24. Environment Committee, 1992. This common inheritance: second year report. HMSO, London.
25. Goodwin, P. et al., 1991. Transport: the new realism. Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford.
26. Grieco M. The Impact of Transport Investment Projects upon the Inner City: A Literature Review. 1994;Aldershot, Avebury.
27. Heenan G.W. The economic effect of rapid transit on real estate development in Toronto. The Appraisal Journal. 1968;213-224.
28. Henneberry J., Lawless P., Townroe P. Banister D. Non-User Benefits from Investments in Urban Light Rail: Evidence from Sheffield in Transport Policy and the Environment. 1998;Spon, London.
29. Hill R. Lawless P., Raban C. Urban Transport: from technical process to social policy in The Contemporary British City. 1986;Harper and Row, London.
30. Huddleston J.R., Pangotra P.P. Regional and local economic impacts of transportation investments. Transportation Quarterly. 44:1990;579-594.
31. Immergluck D.W. The role of public infrastructure in urban economic development. Economic Development Quarterly. 7:1993;310-318.
32. Jones B., Bachelor L. Lawrence K.S. The Sustaining Hand; Community Leadership and Corporate Power. 1993;University Press of Kansas, Kansas.
33. Knight R.I., Trygg L.L. Evidence of land use impacts of rapid transit systems. Transportation. 6:1977;231-247.
34. Law, C., Knowles, R., Grime, E., Senior, L., 1996. Metrolink Impact Study, Department of Geography, University of Salford.
35. Lawless P. Partnership in urban regeneration in the UK: the Sheffield central area study. Urban Studies. 31:1994;1303-1324.
36. Lawless P. The inner cities: towards a new agenda. Town Planning Review. 67:1996;21-44.
37. Lawless P., Dabinett G. Urban regeneration and transport investment: a research agenda. Environment and Planning A. 27:1995;1029-1048.
38. Linnekar B.J., Spence N.A. An accessibility analysis of the impact of the M25 London orbital motorway on Britain. Regional Studies. 26:1992;31-48.
39. Orski C. The federal rail transit policy: rhetoric or reality? Transportation. 9:1980;57-65. quoted in Dickens, I., 1992, Transport investment, economic development and strategic planning: the example of light rail transit, Planning Practice and Research 7, 9-12.
40. Parkinson, M., 1981. The effect of road investment on economic development in the UK. WP-43, Government Economic Service, Department of Transport, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 3EB.
41. Pieda, 1991. Rail link project: a comparative appraisal of socio-economic and development impacts of alternative routes. Report for British Railway Board. Pieda, Edinburgh.
42. Player, R., Haywood, R., 1996. Land-use planning along the strategic road network and supertram lines (Supertram Impact Series Paper No. 29). Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
43. Rietveld P. Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure supply. Transport Research A. 28:1994;329-341.
44. SACTRA, 1997. Transport Investment, Transport Intensity and Economic Growth: Interim Report. SACTRA, London.
45. Sheffield City Council and Sheffield TEC, 1994. Sheffield's Bid to the Single Regeneration Budget. Sheffield City Council.
46. Sheffield City Council and Sheffield TEC, 1995. Growing Together: Youth and Inner City; Regeneration in Partnership in Sheffield. Sheffield City Council.
47. Sheffield City Council, 1996. Development Opportunities along the Supertram Corridors in Sheffield. Sheffield Development Office.
48. Sheffield City Liaison Group, 1994. The way ahead. Plans for the Economic Regeneration of Sheffield, City Liaison Group, Sheffield City Council, Sheffield.
49. Sheffield Development Corporation, 1990. A Vision of the Lower Don Valley: Design Principles for Development. SDC, Sheffield.
50. Sheffield Development Corporation, 1995. Annual Report and Accounts 1994. p. 8.
51. Simpson W. Urban Structure and the Labour Market. 1992;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
52. Stoker G., Young S. Cities in the 1990s. 1993;Longman, London.
53. SYPTE, 1995. South Yorkshire Joint Transport Package Bid, 1996/1997. SYPTE, Sheffield.
54. SYPTE, 1996. South Yorkshire Joint Transport Package Bid, 1997/1998. SYPTE, Sheffield.
55. Townroe P., Dabinett G. The evaluation of public transport investments within cities. The Annals of Regional Science. 29:1995;175-188.
56. Vickerman R.W., Flowerdew A.D.J. The channel tunnel: the economic and regional impact, special report 2024. 1990;Economist Intelligence Unit, London.