Land use and transit integration and transit use incentives

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1618, 1998, Pages 39-47

  Khasnabis, Snehamay ^a  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; AIR QUALITY; DECISION THEORY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAND USE; PUBLIC POLICY; STRATEGIC PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING;

TRANSIT INTEGRATIONS; TRANSIT USE INCENTIVES;

RAPID TRANSIT;

EID: 0032159653     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1618-05     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gomez-Ibanez, J. S. Transportation Policy as a Tool for Shaping Metropolitan Development. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 2, 1985, pp. 55-81.
2. Measuring and Valuing Transit Benefits and Disbenefits. TCRP Project H-1, Phase II, Tasks 5 and 6. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., with Apogee Research, Inc., Aug. 1995.
3. Transit and Urban Form: A Synthesis of Knowledge. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., Oct. 1995.
4. Cervero, R., M. Bernick, and J. Gilbert. Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California. National Transit Access Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1994.
5. Transit and Urban Form: Topic 2 Report - Station Area Development. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., Aug. 1995.
6. Policy Options to Attract Auto Users to Public Transportation. Interim Report. Portland State University, Nov. 1994.
7. Greater Baltimore Alliance. Greater Baltimore Region: Nothing Common About It. Delta Graphics and Communication, Inc., Timonium, Md., 1994.
8. Development of Master Plan: Owings Mills Metro Center. Mass Transit Administration, Maryland Department of Transportation, Baltimore, May 1990.
9. Garreau, J. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. Doubleday, 1991.
10. Black, J. T., et al. Downtown Office Growth and the Role of Public Transit. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 1982.
11. Bonsall, J. Rapid Transit for the Automobile Age. The Urban Transportation Industries Report, 1993, pp. 51-52.
12. Cervero, R., and S. Seskin. TCRP Research Results Digest 7: An Evaluation of the Relationships Between Transit and Urban Form. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., June 1995.
13. Increasing Transit Ridership and the Efficiency of Land Use While Maximizing Economic Potential: Linking Housing Production and Job Growth in the San Francisco Bay Area. Working Paper 90-2. Association of Bay Area Governments, Oct. 1996.
14. Deakin, E., R. Cervero, and J. Landis. BART at 20: Research By Design. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, Calif., 1994.
15. Arnelle and Hastie. The Promise of California's Rail Transit Line in the Siting of New Housing. Report to Senate Transportation Committee and Senate Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, State of California, San Francisco, April 1990.
16. Cervero, R., et al. Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, Calif., 1993.
17. Guide to Land Use and Public Transportation. Snobornish County, Ore., 1991.
18. Major Centers in Greater Vancouver: Current Status and Policy. Strategic Planning Department, Greater Vancouver Regional District, Feb. 1993.
19. Oberlander, P., and P. Smith. Governing Metropolitan Vancouver: Regional Intergovernmental Relations in British Columbia. In American/ Canadian Metropolitan Intergovernmental Governance Perspective, North American Federalism Project, Vol. 1, Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California, Berkeley, 1993.