Sex offender reentry courts: A cost effective proposal for managing sex offender risk in the community

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 989, Issue , 2003, Pages 300-323

  La Fond, John Q ^a   Winick, Bruce J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Public safety; Risk management approach; Sex offender reentry courts; Sex offenders; Therapeutic jurisprudence

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COURT; CRIMINAL LAW; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LEGAL LIABILITY; MULTICHANNEL RECORDER; PREDICTION; PRISON; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECIDIVISM; REGISTRATION; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIETY; VIOLENCE;

EID: 0037713545     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07314.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. CASCARDI, M., POYTHRESS, N.G. & HALL, A. (2000). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: An analogy study. Behavioral Science and the Law, 18, 731-740.
2. CASEY, P. & ROTTMAN, D.B. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 445-457
3. Cassamassima v. State, 657 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (en banc).
4. CLARK, J., AUSTIN, J. & HENRY, D.A. (1997). Three strikes and you're out: A review of state legislation. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief, September 1997. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
5. CONFERENCE OF CHIEF JUSTICES & CONFERENCE OF STATE COURT ADMINISTRATORS (2000). CCJ Resolution 22 & COSCA Resolution 4, In support of problem-solving courts.
6. EDWARDS, W. & HENSLEY, C. (2001). Restructuring sex offender sentencing: A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the criminal justice process, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 646-662.
7. ENGLISH, K., JONES, L. & PATRICK, D. (2003). Community containment of sex offender risk: A promising approach. In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond, (Eds). Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association,
8. FAIGMAN, D., KAYE, D., SAKS, M. & SANDERS, J. (1997). Modern scientific evidence. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
9. FINN, P. (1992). Sex offender community notification; research in action. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
10. FITCH, W.L. & HAMMEN, D.A. (2003). The new generation of sex offender commitment laws: Which states have them and how do they work? In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond, (Eds). Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. FRITZLER, R.B. & SIMON, L.M.J. (2000). The development of a specialized domestic violence court in Vancouver, Washington utilizing innovative judicial paradigms. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 69, 139-177.
12. GIANNELLI, P. & IMWINKELRIED, E. (1993). Scientific evidence, 2nd ed. Charlottesville, VA: Mitchie Co.
13. GOLDKAMP, J.S. & IRONS-GUYNN, C. (2000). Emerging judicial strategies for the mentally ill in the criminal caseload: Mental health courts in Ft. Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino. and Anchorage. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
14. GREENFELD, LAWRENCE A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders, an analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15. HANSON, R.K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 50-72.
16. HANSON, R.K. & BUSSIERE (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66, 348-362.
17. HANSON, R.K., GORDON, A., HARRIS, A.J.R., MARQUES, J.K., MURPHY, W., QUINSEY, V.L. & SETO, M.C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data on the effectiveness of psychological treatment of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
18. HANSON, R.K. (2003). Who is dangerous and when are they safe? Risk assessment with sexual offenders. In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. HEILBRUN, K., NEZU, C., MAGUTH, K.M., CHUNG, S. & WASSERMAN, A.L. (1998). Sexual offending: Linking assessment, intervention, and decision making, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 138-174.
20. HORA, P.F. (2002). A dozen years of drug treatment courts: Uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1469-1488.
21. HORA, P.F., SCHMA, W.G. & ROSENTHAL, J.T.A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review 74, 439-537.
22. Kansas v. Crane, 122 S. Ct. 867 (2002).
23. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).
24. Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972)
25. LA FOND, J.Q. (1998). The costs of enacting a sexual predator law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 468-504.
26. LA FOND, J.Q. (2003a). Outpatient's new frontier: sexually violent predators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 9, 159-182.
27. LA FOND, J.Q. (forthcoming, 2004). Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. LIND, E.A. & TYLER, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
29. LOGAN, W. (2003). Registration and community notification: emerging legal and research issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, (this volume).
30. LURIGIO, A.J., WATSON, A., LUCHINS, D.J. & HANRAHAN, P. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence in action: Specialized courts for the mentally ill. Judicature, 84, 184.
31. McKune v. Lile, WL 1270605 (U.S.) (2002)
32. Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984).
33. MORSE, S.J. (2003). Bad or mad? Sex offenders and social control. In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 165-182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. PETERSILIA, J. (November, 2000), When Prisoners Return to Communities: Political, Economic, and Social Consequences, Sentencing & Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, NCJ 184253.
35. PETRUCCI, C.J. (2002). Respect as a component in the judge-defendant interaction in a specialized domestic violence court that utilizes therapeutic jurisprudence, Criminal. Law Bulletin, 38, 263-277.
36. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. (1989). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
37. RICE, M.E. & HARRIS, G.T. (2003). What we know and don't know about treating adult sex offenders. In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 101-117). Washington, DC; American Psychological Association.
38. ROTTMAN, D.B. (2000). Does effective therapeutic jurisprudence require specialized courts (and do specialized courts imply specialist judges)? Court Review, 37, 22-27
39. SAUNDERS, T. (Winter 2002). Staying home: Effective reintegration strategies for parolees. The Judges' Journal, 41, 34-36.
40. SCHLANK, A. (1999). Guidelines for the development of new programs, in Anita Schlank & Fred Cohen (Eds.), The sexual predator: Law, policy, evaluation and treatment, pp. 12-5 & 12-6. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.
41. SIMON, L.M.J. (2003a). Proactive judges: Solving problems and transforming communities. In David Carson & Ray Bull (Eds.), The Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts, 2nd ed. (pp. 449-472). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
42. SIMON. L.M.J. (2003b). Matching legal policies with known offenders. In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 149-163). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA. (2002). Research summary: The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders.
44. TRAVIS, J. (2000). But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
45. TYLER, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 (1998).
47. WASH. REV. CODE §§9.94A.712. 713 (West, 2002).
48. WASH. REV. CODE §9.94A.670 (2002).
49. WETTSTEIN, R.M. (1992). A psychiatric perspective on Washington's sexually violent predator law. University of Puget Sound Law Review, 15, 597-633.
50. WEXLER, D.B. & WINICK, B.J. (1992). Therapeutic jurisprudence and criminal justice mental health issues, Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter, 16, 225-231
51. WEXLER, D.B. & WINICK, B.J. (Eds.) (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in Therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
52. WINICK, B.J. (2003a). Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem solving courts. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30, 1055-1090.
53. WINICK, B.J. (2003b). Outpatient commitment: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 9, 107-144.
54. WINICK, B.J. (2003c). A therapeutic jurisprudence assessment of sexually violent predator laws. In Bruce J. Winick & John Q. La Fond (Eds.) Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 213-229). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55. WINICK, B.J. (2003d). A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of sex offender registration and community notification laws. In Winick, B.J. & La Fond, J.Q. (Eds.) Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. WINICK, B.J. (1999a). Redefining the role of the criminal defense lawyer at plea bargaining and sentencing: A therapeutic jurisprudence/preventive law model. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 5, 1034-1083.
57. WINICK, B.J. (1999b). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil commitment hearing, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10, 7-60.
58. WINICK, B.J. (1998) Sex offender law in the 1990s: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis, Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 4, 505-572
59. WINICK, B.J. (1991). Harnessing the power of the bet: Wagering with the government as a mechanism for social and individual change, University of Miami Law Review, 45, 737-813.
60. WINICK, B.J. & WEXLER, D.B. (2002). Drug treatment court: Therapeutic jurisprudence applied. Touro Law Review, 18, 479-485.
61. WINICK, B.J. & LA FOND, J.Q. (Eds.) (2003). Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
62. WINICK, B.J. & WEXLER, D.B. (Eds.) (2003). Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
63. WOODBURN, S.G. & ENGLISH, K. (2002). Community corrections in Colorado: A report of the findings. Office of Research and Statistics, Division of Criminal Justice. Denver, CO. Colorado Department of Public Safety.
64. ZEVITS, R.G. & FARKAS, M. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin: Research in brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.