Outpatient commitment: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 107-144

  Winick, Bruce J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

CIVIL RIGHTS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; FREEDOM; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; LIVING WILL; MANDATORY PROGRAM; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES; MENTAL PATIENT; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTARY PROGRAM;

LEGAL APPROACH; MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; CIVIL RIGHTS; COERCION; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FREEDOM; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; JUDICIAL ROLE; JURISPRUDENCE; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTALLY ILL PERSONS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTARY PROGRAMS;

EID: 0037960350     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.9.1-2.107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (103)

1. Allen, M., & Smith, V. F. (2001). Opening Pandora's box: The practical and legal dangers of involuntary outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services, 52, 342-350.
2. Amador, X., & Johanson, A. (2000). I am not sick, I don't need help! New York: Vida Press.
3. Amador, X., & Shivar A. A. (2000). Insight into schizophrenia: Anosognosia, competency, and civil liberties. George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 11, 25-39.
4. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Involuntary commitment to outpatient treatment. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1995). The MacArthur treatment competence study: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law & Human Behavior, 19, 105-126.
6. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. (2002). The role of mental health courts in system reform. [Retrieved June 24, 2002, from http://www.bazelon.org/issues/criminalization/publications/mentalhealthcourts/ index.htm]
7. Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir. 1984).
8. Birgden, A. (2002). Dealing with the resistant criminal client: A psychologically-minded strategy for more effective legal counseling. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38, 225-243.
9. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
10. Borum, R., Swartz, M., Riley, S., Swanson, J., Hiday, V. A., & Wagner, R. (1999). Consumer perceptions of involuntary outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services, 50, 1489-1491.
11. Cascardi, M., Poythress, N. G., & Hall, A. (2000). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: An analogy study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 731-740.
12. Casey, P., & Rottman, D. B. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 445-457.
13. Dennis, D. L., & Monahan, J. (1996). Coercion and aggressive community treatment: A new frontier in mental health law. New York: Plenum.
14. Durham, M. (1989). The impact of deinstitutionalization on the current treatment of the mentally ill. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 12, 117-131.
15. Elbogin, E. B., & Tomkins, A. J. (2000). From the psychiatric hospital to the community: Integrating conditional release and contingency management. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 427-444.
16. Ennis, B. J. (1972). Prisoners of psychiatry: Mental patients, psychiatrists, and the law. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17. Fisher, D., & Ahern, L. (2001). PACE: Personal assistance in community existence. [Retrieved from http://www.power2u.org/pace_manual.pdf]
18. Fritzler, R. B. (2003). How one misdemeanor mental health court incorporates therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and restorative justice. In J. M. Moore (Ed.), Management and administration of correctional health care: Policy, practice, administration. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
19. Gallagher, E. M. (1998). Advance directives for psychiatric care: A theoretical and practical overview for legal professionals. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 4, 746-787.
20. Gerbasi, J. D., Bonnie R. B., & Binder, R. L. (2000). Resource document on mandatory outpatient treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 28, 127-144.
21. Goldkamp, J. S., & Irons-Guynn, C. (2000). Emerging judicial strategies for the mentally ill in the criminal caseload: Mental health courts in Ft. Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, DC: U. S. Deppartment of Justice, Office o Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
22. Greer, A, O'Regan, M., & Traverse A. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence and patients' perceptions of procedural due process of civil commitment hearings. In D. B. Wexler & B. J. Winick (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 923-933). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
23. Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995). The MacArthur treatment competence study. III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law & Human Behavior, 19, 149-174.
24. Hoge, M. A., & Grottole, E. (2000). The case against outpatient commitment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 165-170.
25. Hora, P. F. (in press). A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. University of Delaware Journal of Drug Use and Misuse.
26. Hora, P. F., Schma, W., & Rosenthal, J. T. A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-555.
27. Klerman, G. (1977). Better but not well: Social and ethical issues in the deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 3, 617-631.
28. Klerman, G. (1979). National trends in hospitalization. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 30, 110-113.
29. Kress, K. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the resolution of value conflicts: What we can realistically expect, in practice, from theory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 555-588.
30. Kress, K. (2000). An argument for assisted outpatient treatment for persons with serious mental illness illustrated with reference to a proposed statute for Iowa. Iowa Law Review, 85, 1269-1386.
31. Lidz, C. W., Hoge, S. K., Gardner, W. P., Bennett, N. S., Monhan, J., Mulvey, E. P., & Roth, L. H. (1995). Perceived coercion in mental hospital admission: Pressures and process. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1034-1039.
32. Lurigio, A. J., Watson, A., Luchins, D. J., & Hanrahan, P. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence in action: Specialized courts for the mentally ill. Judicature, 84, 184-189.
33. Matter of Urcuyo, 714 N.Y.S. 2d 862 (Sup. Ct., Nassau County, 2000).
34. Meichenbaum, D., & Turk, D. (1987). Facilitating treatment adherence: A practitioner's guidebook. New York: Plenum Press.
35. Miller, R. D. (1998). Advance directives for psychiatric treatment: A view from the trenches. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 41, 728-745.
36. Miller, R. D., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
37. Miller, R. E., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). Grievances, claims, and dispute: Assessing the adversary culture. Law and Society Review, 15, 525-566.
38. Monahan, J., Bonnie, R. J., Appelbaum, P. S., Hyde, P. S., Steadman, H. J., Swartz, M. S. (2001). Mandated community treatment: Beyond outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1198-1205.
39. Monahan, J., Hoge, S. K., Lidz, C. W., Eisenberg, M. M., Bennett, N. S., Gardner, W. P., Mulvey, E. P., & Roth, L. H. (1996). Coercion to inpatient treatment: Initial results and implications for assertive treatment in the community. In D. L. Dennis & J. Monahan (Eds.), Coercion and aggressive community treatment: A new frontier in mental health law (pp. 13-28). New York: Plenum Press.
40. Monahan, J., Lidz, C. W., Hoge, S. K., Mulvey, E. P., Eisenberg, M. M., Roth, L. H., Gardner, W. P., & Bennett, N. (1999). Coercion in the provision of mental health services: The MacArthur studies. In J. Morrissey & J. Monahan (Eds.), Coercion in mental health services (p. 13). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
41. Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Murray, S., Rau, A. S., & Sherman, E. F. (1996). Processes of dispute resolution: The role of lawyers (2nd ed.). Westbury, CT: Foundation Press.
43. National Council on Disability Members and Staff. (2002). The well being of our nation: An inter-generational vision of effective mental health services and supports. Retrieved from http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/mentalhealth.html.
44. National Mental Health Association. (2001). Mental Health Courts. [Retrieved June 24, 2002, from http://www.nmha.org/position/mentalhealthcourts.cfm]
45. New York Mental Hygiene Law §§ 9.60-.61 (1996).
46. Perlin, M. L. (1991). Competency, deinstitutionalization, and homelessness: A story of marginalization. Houston Law Review, 28, 63-142.
47. Perlin, M. L. (1994). Law and mental disability. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
48. Perlin, M. L. (1996). The voluntary delivery of mental health services in the community. In B. D. Sales & D. W. Shuman (Eds.), Law, mental health, and mental disorder (pp. 150-177). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49. Perlin, M. L. (2000). The hidden prejudice: Mental disability on trial. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
50. Perlin, M. L. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence and outpatient commitment law: Kendra's Law as case study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1/2, 183-208.
51. Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. (2001, Winter). Preliminary observations from an evaluation of the Broward Country mental health court. Court Review, 37, 14-22.
52. Petrucci, C. J. (2002). Respect as a component in the judge-defendant interaction in a specialized domestic violence court that utilizes therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38, 263-295.
53. Petrucci, C. J., Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2002). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An invitation to social scientists. In D. Carson & R. Bull (Eds.), The handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2nd ed., pp. 579-601). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
54. Reisig, M. (2002). The difficult role of the defense lawyer in a post-adjudication drug treatment court: Accommodating therapeutic jurisprudence and due process. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38, 216-224.
55. Ridgely, M. S., Borum, R., & Petrila, J. (2001). The effectiveness of involuntary outpatient treatment. [Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1340]
56. Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992).
57. Rottman, D. B., & Casey, P. (1999, Summer). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the emergence of problem solving courts. National Institute of Justice Journal, 12-19.
58. Saks, E. (1991). Competency to refuse treatment. North Carolina Law Review, 69, 945-999.
59. Slobogin, C. (1996). "Appreciation" as a measure of competency: Some thoughts about the MacArthur group's approach. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 18-30.
60. Stavis, P. F. (1999). The nexum: A modest proposal of self-guardianship by contract: A system of advance directives and surrogate committees-at-large for the intermittently mentally ill. Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy, 1, 21-22.
61. Steadman, H. J., Gounis, K., Dennis, D., Hopper, K., Roche, B., Swartz, M., & Robbins, P.C. (2001). Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program. Psychiatric Services, 52, 330-336.
62. Steadman, H. J., Morris, S. M., & Dennis, D. L. (1995). The diversion of mentally ill persons from jails to community-based services: A profile of programs. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1-6.
63. Stefan, S. (1987). Preventive Commitment: The concept and its pitfalls. Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter, 11, 288-296.
64. Stein, L. I. & Diamond, R. J. (2000). Commentary: A "systems"-based alternative to mandatory outpatient treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 28, 159-164.
65. Stiles, P. G. Poythress, N. G., Hall, A., Falkenbach, D., & Williams, R. (2001). Improving understanding of research consent disclosures among persons with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52, 780-785.
66. Stolle, D. P., Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (Eds.). (2000). Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
67. Susman, J. (1996). Resolving hospital conflicts: A study on therapeutic jurisprudence. In D. B. Wexler & B. J. Winick (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence, (pp. 907-922). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
68. Swartz, M. S., & Monahan, J. (2001). Special section on involuntary outpatient commitment: Introduction. Psychiatric Services, 52, 323-324.
69. Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., Hiday, V. A., Wagner, H. R., Burns, B. J., & Borum, R. (2001). A randomized controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psychiatric Services, 52, 325-329.
70. Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., Wagner, H. R., & Burns, B. J. (1999). Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism? Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1-29.
71. Sydeman, S. J., Cascardi, M., Poythress, N. G., & Rittenband, L. M. (1997). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: A critique of Tyler's analysis. Psychology Public Policy & Law, 3, 207-221.
72. Task Force on Therapeutic Jurisprudence. (2000). CCJ Resolution 22 & COSCA Resolution 4: In support of problem solving courts. Rapid City, SD: Conference of Chief Justices & Conference of State Court Administrators.
73. Tomkins, A. J., & Carson, D. (Eds.). (1999). International perspectives on therapeutic jurisprudence, Part 1 [Special issue]. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 553-696.
74. Tomkins, A. J., & Carson, D. (Eds.). (2000). International perspectives on therapeutic jurisprudence: Part 2 [Special issue]. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 411-556.
75. Torrey, E. F., & Zdanowicz, M. (2001). Outpatient commitment: What, why and for whom? Psychiatric Services, 52, 337-341.
76. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
77. Tyler, T. R. (1992). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46, 433-445.
78. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1992). Felony defendants in large urban countries. Washington, DC: Author.
79. Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990).
80. Watnik, I. L. (2001). A constitutional analysis of Kendra's law: New York's solution for treatment of the chronically mentally ill. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149, 1181-1289.
81. Wexler, D. B. (1991). Health care compliance principles and the insanity acquitee conditional release process. In D. B. Wexler & B. J. Winick (Eds.), Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 199-218). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
82. Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1991). Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
83. Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (Eds.). (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
84. Winick, B. J. (1977). Psychotropic medication and competence to stand trial. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1977, 769-816.
85. Winick, B. J. (1989). The right to refuse mental health treatment: A First Amendment perspective. University of Miami Law Review, 44, 1-103.
86. Winick, B. J. (1991a). Competency to consent to treatment: The distinction between assent and objection. Houston Law Review, 28, 15-61.
87. Winick, B. J. (1991b). Competency to consent to voluntary hospitalization: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of Zinermon v. Burch. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 14, 169-214.
88. Winick, B. J. (1991c). Harnessing the power of the bet: Wagering with the government as a mechanism for social and individual change. University of Miami Law Review, 45, 737-814.
89. Winick, B. J. (1992). On autonomy: Legal and psychological perspectives. Villanova Law Review, 37, 1705-1777.
90. Winick, B. J. (1995). The side effects of incompetency labeling and the implications for mental health law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 6-42.
91. Winick, B. J. (1996). Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness. University of Miami Law Review, 51, 57-95.
92. Winick, B. J. (1997a). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 184-206.
93. Winick, B. J., (1997b). Therapeutic jurisprudence applied: Essays on mental health law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
94. Winick, B. J. (1997c). The right to refuse mental health treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
95. Winick, B. J. (1997d). Coercion and mental health treatment. Denver Law Review, 74, 1145-1168.
96. Winick, B. J. (Ed.). (1998). Symposium: Advance directive instruments for health and mental health care: Legal, ethical, and clinical issues. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 4, 577-928.
97. Winick, B. J. (1999a). Redefining the role of the criminal defense lawyer at plea bargaining and sentencing: A therapeutic jurisprudence/ preventive law model. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 5, 1034-1083.
98. Winick, B. J. (1999b). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil commitment hearing. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10, 37-60.
99. Winick, B. J. (2000). Applying the law therapeutically in domestic violence cases. University of Missouri - Kansas City Law Review, 69, 33-91.
100. Winick, B. J. (in press-a). A therapeutic jurisprudence model for civil commitment. In I. Freckleton & K. Diesfield (Eds.), Involuntary detention and civil commitment: International perspectives. London: Dartmouth.
101. Winick, B. J. (in press-b). therapeutic jurisprudence in problem solving courts. Fordham Urban Law Review.
102. Winick, B. J., Wexler, D. B., & Dauer, E. A. (Eds.). (1999). Symposium: Therapeutic jurisprudence and preventive law: Transforming legal practice and education. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 5, 793-1210.
103. Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (in press). Therapeutic jurisprudence and drug treatment courts: A symbiotic relationship. In A. Graham & T. K. Schultz (Eds.), Principles of addiction medicine (3rd ed.). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine.