Proactive Judges: Solving Problems and Transforming Communities

Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 449-472

  Simon, Leonore M J ^a  

^a EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038636558     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470013397.ch19     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Babb, B.A. (1998a). Fashioning an interdisciplinary framework for court reform in family law: A blueprint to construct a unified family court. Southern California Law Review, 71, 469-545.
2. Babb, B.A. (1998b). Wherewe stand: An analysis of America's family lawadjudicatory systems and the mandate to establish unified family courts. Family Law Quarterly, 32, 31-65.
3. Bazemore, G. and Schiff, M. (2001). Introduction. In G. Bazemore and M. Schiff (eds), Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities. Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing Co.
4. Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbian University.
5. Berman, G. and Feinblatt, J. (2000). Problem-solving courts: A brief primer. NY: Center for Court Innovation.
6. Brown, L.M. and Dauer, E. (1978). Perspectives on the lawyer as planner. Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.
7. Bureau of Justice Assistance (1997). Trial court performance standards. Washington, DC.
8. Casey, P. (1998). Defining optimal court performance: The trial court performance standards. Court Review, 35, 24-29.
9. Casey, P. and Rottman, D. (1998). Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Court Perspective. A white paper presented to the California Judicial Council. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
10. Chase, D.J. and Hora, P.F. (2000). The implications of therapeutic jurisprudence for judicial satisfaction. Court Review, 37, 12-20.
11. Clear, T.R. and Karp, D.R. (1999). The community justice ideal: Preventing crime and achieving justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12. Commission on Trial Court Performance Standards (1997). Trial Court Performance Standards with Commentary. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
13. Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators Task Force on Therapeutic Justice (2000). Resolution supporting 'problem-solving courts', adopted Aug. 3, 2000, Task Force on Therapeutic Justice of CCJ/COSCA.
14. Crawford, A. and Clear, T. (2001). Community justice: Transforming communities through restorative justice? In G. Bazemore and M. Schiff (eds), Restorative community justice:Repairing harm and transforming communities (pp. 127-149. Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing Co.
15. Daicoff, S. (1997). Lawyer know thyself: A review of empirical research on attorney attributes bearing on professionalism, American University Law Review, 46, 1333-1427 (esp. pp. 1401-1403).
16. Dauer, E.A. (1990 March). Future of the legal profession lies in utilizing preventive law. Preventive Law Reporter, 20-27.
17. Fritzler, R.B. and Simon, L.M.J. (2000a). Creating a domestic violence court: Combat in the trenches. Court Review, 37, 28-39.
18. Fritzler, R.B. and Simon, L.M.J. (2000b). The development of a specialized domestic violence court in Vancouver, Washington utilizing innovative judicial paradigms. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 69, 139-177.
19. Gebelein, R.S. (2000). The rebirth of rehabilitation: Promise and perils of drug courts. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
20. Goldkamp, J.S. (2000). The drug court response: Issues and implications for justice change. Albany Law Review, 63, 923-1006.
21. Goldkamp, J. and Irons-Guynn, C. (2000). Emerging judicial strategies for the mentally ill in the criminal caseload: Mental health courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22. Hardway, R.M. (1997). Preventive law: Materials on a non-adversarial legal process. Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing Co.
23. Harrell, A., Cavanagh, S. and Roman, J. (2000). Evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
24. Hart, B. (1996). Battered women and the criminal justice system. In E. Buzawa and C.G. Buzawa (eds), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 98-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Hora, P.F., Schma, W.G. and Rosenthal, J.T.A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-537.
26. Janoff, S. (1991). The influence of legal education on moral reasoning. Minnesota Law Review, 76, 193-238.
27. Kaye, J.S. (1999, Oct. 11). Making the case for hands-on courts. Newsweek, p. 13.
28. Kelling, G.L. and Moore, M.H. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
29. Kuhn, J.A. (1998). A seven-year lesson on unified family courts: What we have learned since the 1990 National Family Court Symposium. Family Law Quarterly, 32, 67-93.
30. Lee, E. (2000). Community courts: An evolving model. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
31. Lipscher, R.D. (1999). The judicial response to the drug crisis: A report of an executive symposium involving judicial leaders of the nation's nine most populous states. State Court Journal, 13, 13-17.
32. Lurigio, A.J., Watson, A., Luchins, D.J. and Hanrahan, P. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence in action: Specialized courts for the mentally ill. Judicature, 84, 184-189.
33. Mills, L.G. (2000). Affective lawyering: The emotional dimensions of the lawyer-client relation. In D.P. Stolle, D.B.Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 419-446). Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
34. Moore, M.H. (1992). Problem-solving and community policing. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds), Modern policing (pp. 99-158). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. National Drug Court Institute (2001) at http://www.ndci.org/courtfacts.htm
36. National Center for State Courts (1999). How the public views the state courts: A 1999 national survey. Williamsburg, VA: Author.
37. Office of Victims of Crime (2001). Victims, judges, and juvenile court reform through restorative justice. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
38. Ostrom, B.J. and Kauder, N.B. (1998). Examining the work of state courts, 1997: A national perspective from the Court Statistics Project. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
39. Ostrom, B.J. and Kauder, N.B. (1999). Examining the work of state courts, 1998: A national perspective from the Court Statistics Project. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
40. Petersilia, J. (2000). When prisoners return to the community: Political, economic, and social consequences. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
41. Richards III, E.P. (1992 June). Should preventive law, like some medicine, be mandated by government? Preventive Law Reporter, 28-31.
42. Ross, C.J. (1998). The failure of fragmentation: The promise of a system of unified family courts. Family Law Quarterly, 32, 3-30.
43. Rottman, D.B. (2000). Does effective therapeutic jurisprudence require specialized courts (and do specialized courts imply specialist judges)? Court Review, 37, 22-27 (esp. p. 22).
44. Rottman, D.B. and Casey, P. (1999 July). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the emergence of problem-solving courts. National Institute of Justice Journal, 12-19.
45. Rottman, D., Efkeman, H.S. and Casey, P. (1998). Aguide to court and community collaboration. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
46. Rottman, D.B., Flango, C.R., Cantrell, M.T., Hansen, R. and LaFountain, N. (2000). State court organization 1998. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
47. Schma, W.G. (1997). Review [Reviewof the book Law in a therapeutic key]. Judges, 36, 81-82.
48. Schma, W. (2000). Judging in the new millennium. Court Review, 37, 4-6 (esp. p. 4).
49. Simon, L.M.J. (1995). Atherapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 43-79.
50. Simon, L.M.J. (1999). Sex offender legislation and the antitherapeutic effects on victims. Arizona Law Review, 41, 485-533.
51. Slobogin, C. (1995). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 193-219.
52. Smith, M.E. (2001). What future for 'public safety' and 'restorative justice' in community corrections? Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
53. Stolle, D.P. (2000). Introduction. In D.P. Stolle, D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. xv-xvii). Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
54. Stolle, D.P., Wexler, D.B., Winick, B.J. and Dauer, E.A. (1997). Integrating preventive law and therapeutic jurisprudence: A law and psychology based approach to lawyering. California Western Law Review, 34 15-51.
55. Stolle, D.P., Wexler, D.B., Winick, B.J. and Dauer, E.A. (2000). Integrating preventive law and therapeutic jurisprudence: A law and psychology based approach to lawyering. In D.P. Stolle, D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 5-44). Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
56. Sviridoff, M., Rottman, D., Ostrom, B. and Curtis, R. (1997). Dispensing justice locally: The implementation and effects of the Midtown Community Court. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
57. Town, M.A. (1998). Court as convenor and provider of therapeutic justice. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 67, 671-675.
58. Travis, J. (2000). But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
59. Williams, P.M. (1995). A unified family court for Missouri. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 63, 383-427.
60. Wexler, D.B. (1998). Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Psycholegal soft spots and strategies. Revista Juridica, 67, 317-342.
61. Wexler, D.B. (1999). The development of therapeutic jurisprudence: From theory to practice. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 68, 691-705.
62. Wexler, D.B. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the culture of critique. In D.P. Stolle, D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 449-464). Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
63. Wexler, D.B. and Winick, B.J. (1996). Introduction. In D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. vii-xx). Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
64. Winick, B.J. (2000). Applying the law therapeutically in domestic violence cases. University of Missouris-Kansas City Law Review, 69, 33-91.
65. Zimmerman, M.D. (1998). A new approach to court reform. Judicature, 82, 108-111.