Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 307-317

  Norel, Raquel ^a,b   Petrey, Donald ^b   Wolfson, Haim J ^a   Nussinov, Ruth ^a,c,d  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Docking; Molecular surface complementarity; Protein protein recognition; Rigid body matching; Shape complementarity; Surface normals

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYPEPTIDASE; CHYMOTRYPSIN; CHYMOTRYPSIN INHIBITOR; HEMOGLOBIN ALPHA CHAIN; HYDROLASE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN FRAGMENT; KALLIKREIN; LIGAND; LYSOZYME; OVOMUCOID; PROTEINASE; RECEPTOR; SERINE PROTEINASE; SUBTILISIN; THERMITASE; THROMBIN; TRYPSIN; TRYPSIN INHIBITOR; TRYPSINOGEN; VIRUS HEMAGGLUTININ;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY TRANSFER; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; HYDROGEN BONDING; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033566576     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990815)36:3<307::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-R     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bernstein F, Koetzle T, Williams G, et al. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
2. Goodsell D, Olson A. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins 1990;8:195-202.
3. Bacon D, Moult J. Docking by least-square fitting of molecular surface patterns. J Mol Biol 1992;225:849-858.
4. Kuntz I, Blaney J, Oatley S, Langridge R, Ferrin T. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982; 161:269-288.
5. 1 subunit interface. Biopolymers 1986;25:1229-1247.
6. Cherfils J, Duquerroy S, Janin J. Protein-protein recognition analyzed by docking simulations. Proteins 1991;11:271-280.
7. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem A, Aflalo C, Vakser I. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between protein and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
8. Jiang F, Kim S. Soft docking: matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991;219:79-102.
9. Shoichet B, Kuntz I. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:327-346.
10. Wang H. Grid-search molecular accessible algorithm for solving the protein docking problem. J Comp Chem 1991;12:746-750.
11. Cherfils J, Janin J. Protein docking algorithms: simulating molecular recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1993;3:265-269.
12. Norel R, Fischer D, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Molecular surface recognition by a computer vision based technique. Protein Engineering 1994;7:39-46.
13. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 1994;34:933-940.
14. Helmer-Citterich M, Tramonato A. Puzzle: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1021-1031.
15. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Biol 248:459-477.
16. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: the critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse points in docking. J Mol Biol 1995;252:263-273.
17. Lengauer T, Rarey M. Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:402-406.
18. Walqvist A, Covell D. Docking enzyme-inhibitor complexes using a preference-based free-energy surface. Proteins 1996;25:403-419.
19. Meyer M, Wilson P, Schomburg D. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. J Mol Biol 1996;264:199-210.
20. Xu D, Lin S, Nussinov R. Protein binding versus protein folding: the role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations. J Mol Biol 1997;265:68-84.
21. Kasinos N, Lilley G, Subbarao N, Haneef I. A robust and efficient automated docking algorithm for molecular recognition. Protein Engineering 1992;5(1):69-75.
22. Gabb H-A, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
23. Jackson R, Gabb H, Sternberg M. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
24. Connolly M. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J Appl Cryst 1983;16:548-558.
25. Connolly M. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983;221:709-713.
26. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1992; 14(2):239-256.
27. Stickle DF, Presta LG, Dill KA, Rose GD. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;226:1143-1159.
28. Sridhiran S, Nicholls A, Honig B. A new vertex algorithm to calculate solvent-accessible surface areas. Biophys J 1992;61: A174.
29. MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellot M, et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
30. Peters KP, Fauck J, Frommel C. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. J Mol Biol 1996;256:201-213.
31. Laskowski RA, Luscombe NM, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Prot Sci 1996;5:2438-2452.