Impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition

Language Learning

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 325-368

  Morris, Frank A ^a   Tarone, Elaine E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037669233     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00219     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Beebe, L. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style-shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 433-447.
3. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
4. Blanco-Iglesias, S., Broner, M., & Tarone, E. (1995). Observations of language use in Spanish immersion classroom interactions. In L. Eubanks, L. Selinker, & M. S. Smith (Eds.), Festschrift for William Rutherford (pp. 239-251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Broner, M. (2000). Impact of interlocutor and task on first and second language use in a Spanish immersion program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
6. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 26, 45-66.
7. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
10. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.
12. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Havranek, G. (1999). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: Preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangere, 2, 81-88.
15. Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30-87.
16. Leeman, J. (2000). Towards a new classification of input: An empirical study of the effect of recasts, negative evidence and enhanced salience on L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
17. Lochtman, K. (2000, November). The role of negative feedback in experiential vs. analytic foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the Conference on Instructed Second Language Learning, Brussels, Belgium.
18. Long, M. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81, 318-323.
19. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
20. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lynch, A., Klee, C., & Tedick, D. (2001). Social factors and language proficiency in postsecondary Spanish immersion: Issues and implications. Hispania, 84, 510-524.
22. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
23. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
24. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive implicit negative feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
25. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversation interaction and second language development: Recasts, response and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
26. Morris, F. (2002a). Learner-learner interaction in the Spanish foreign language classroom: The effects of recasts and negotiation on L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
27. Morris, F. (2002b). Negotiation and recasts in relation to error types and learner repair. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 395-404.
28. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-62.
29. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
30. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaeste (Eds.), The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Preston, D. (1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
32. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
33. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Talking it through: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
34. Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning, 29, 181-191.
35. Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143-163.
36. Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.
37. Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Article usage in interlanguage: A study in task-related variability. Language Learning, 38, 21-44.
38. Tarone, E., & Swain, M. (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second-language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 79, 166-178.
39. VanPatten, B. (1995). Input processing and second language acquisition: On the relationship between form and meaning. In P. Hashemipour, R. Maldonado, & M. Van Naerssen (Eds.), Festschrift in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 170-183). New York: McGraw Hill.
40. VanPatten, B., Lee, J., & Ballman, T. (2000). ¿Sabías Qué? San Francisco: McGrawHill.
41. Young, R., & Bayley, R. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 253-306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Yule, G., & Macdonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539-556.