Effects of a guilt induction and guilt reduction on door in the face

Communication Research

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 666-680+734

  Millar, Murray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037646796     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365002237831     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrahams, M., & Bell, R. (1994). Encouraging charitable contributions: An examination of three models of door-in-the-face compliance. Communication Research, 21, 131-153.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Baumeister, R., Stillwell, A., & Heatherton, T. (1995). Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 173-198.
4. Bell, R., Abrahams, M., Clark, C., & Schlatter, C. (1996). The door-in-the-face compliance strategy: An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fund raising context. Communication Quarterly, 44, 107-124.
5. Bentler, P. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
6. Boster, F., Mitchell, M., Lapinski, M., Cooper, H., Orrego, V., & Rienke, R. (1999). The impact of guilt and type of compliance-gaining message on compliance. Communication Monographs, 66, 168-177.
7. Cantrill, J., & Seibold, D. (1986). The perceptual contrast explanation of sequential request strategy effectiveness. Human Communication Research, 13, 253-267.
8. Caprara, G., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Cermak, I., & Rosza, S. (2001). Facing guilt: Role of negative affectivity, need for reparation, and fear of punishment in leading to prosocial behaviour and aggression. European Journal of Personality, 15, 219-237.
9. Cialdini, R., & Ascani, K. (1976). Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 295-300.
10. Cialdini, R., Vincent, J., Lewis, S., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206-215.
11. Coulter, R., & Pinto, M. (1995). Guilt appeals in advertising: What are their effects? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 697-705.
12. Dillard, J. P. (1991). The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 17, 283-288.
13. Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communications Research, 10, 461-488.
14. Fern, E., Monroe, K., & Avila, R. (1986). Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 144-152.
15. Goldman, M., McVeigh, J., & Richterkessing, J. (1984). Door-in-the-face procedure: Reciprocal concession, perceptual contrast, or worthy person. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 245-251.
16. Martens, R., Kelly, S., & Diskin, M. (1996). The effects of two sequential request strategies on teachers' acceptability and use in a classroom intervention. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 7, 211-221.
17. Millar, M. G. (2001). Promoting health behaviors with door-in-the-face: The influence of the beneficiary of the request. Psychology, Health, & Medicine, 6, 115-121.
18. Miller, R., Seligman, C., Clark, N., & Bush, M. (1976). Perceptual contrast versus reciprocal concession as mediators of induced compliance. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 8, 401-409.
19. O'Keefe, D., & Figge, M. (1997). A guilt-based explanation of the door-in-the-face influence strategy. Human Communication Research, 24, 64-80.
20. O'Keefe, D., & Figge, M. (1999). Guilt and expected guilt in the door-in-the-face technique. Communication Monographs, 66, 312-324.
21. O'Keefe, D., & Hale, S. (2001). An odds-ratio-based meta-analysis of research on the door-in-the-face influence strategy, Communication Reports, 14, 31-38.
22. Patch, M., Hoang, V., & Stahelski, A. (1997). The use of meta-communication in compliance: Door-in-the-face and single request strategies. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 88-97.
23. Pendleton, M., & Batson, D. (1979). Self-presentation and the door-in-the-face technique for inducing compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 77-81.
24. Reeves, R., Baker, G., Boyd, J., & Cialdini, R. (1991). The door-in-the-face technique: Reciprocal concessions vs. self-presentational explanations. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 545-558.
25. Regan, D., Williams, M., & Sparling, S. (1972). Voluntary expiation of guilt: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 41-45.
26. Schwarzwald, J., Raz, M., & Zvibel, M. (1979). The applicability of the door-in-the-face technique when established behavioral customs exist. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 576-586.
27. Shanab, M., & Isonio, S. (1980). The effects of delay upon compliance with socially undesirable request in the door-in-the-face paradigm. Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society, 15, 76-78.
28. Tusing, K., & Dillard, J. (2000). The psychological reality of the door-in-the-face: It's helping, not bargaining. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 5-25.