Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 723-730

  Bruno, Nicola ^a   Bernardis, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMITATION; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037631675     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196327     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AGLIOTI, S., DESOUZA, J. F., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. BHALLA, M., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1076-1096.
3. BOESSENKOOL, J. J., NIJHOF, E. J., & ERKELENS, C. J. (1999). Variability and correlations of bi-manual pointing movements. Human Movement Science, 18, 525-552.
4. BRENNER, E., & SMEETS, J. B. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
5. BRIDGEMAN, B. (1999). Separate representation of visual space tor perception and visually guided behavior. In G. Aschersleben & T. Bachmann (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 3-13). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
6. BRIDGEMAN, B., KIRCH, M., & SPERLING, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
7. BRIDGEMAN, B., LEWIS, S., HEIT, G., &,NAGLE, M. (1979). Relationship between cognitive and motor systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 692-700.
8. BRUCE, V., GREEN, P. R., & GEORGESON, M. A. (1996). Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, and ecology (3rd ed.). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
9. BRUNO, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 379-382.
10. CAREY, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 109-113.
11. CUTTING, J. E., & VISHTON, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol 5. Perception of space and motion (pp. 69-117). San Diego: Academic Press.
12. DAPRATI, E., & GENTILUCCI, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
13. DELUCIA, P. R., TRESILIAN, J. R., & MEYER, L. E. (2000). Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 522-567.
14. FRANZ, E. A., ZELAZNIK, H. N., SWINNEN, S., & WALTER, C. (2001). Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: When a dual task becomes a single task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 103-112.
15. FRANZ, V. H., GEGENFURTNER, K. R., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & FAHLE, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
16. GENTILUCCI, M., CHIEFFI, S., DAPRATI, E., SAETTI, M. C., & TONI, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34, 369-376.
17. GERBINO, W. (1979). Il ruolo della forma nelle modificazioni di grandezza dovute a completamento amodale [The role of form in size modifications due to amodal completion]. Reports from the Institute of Psychology, University of Trieste.
18. HAFFENDEN, A. M., & GOODALE, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
19. HAFFENDEN, A. M., SCHIFF, K. C., & GOODALE, M. A. (2001). The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology, 11, 177-181.
20. JACKSON, S. R., & SHAW, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 418-423.
21. KANIZSA, G. (1972). Schrumpfung von visuellen Feldern bei amodaler Ergänzung [Shrinkage of the visual field due to amodal completion]. Studia Psychologica, 14, 208-210.
22. KANIZSA, G. (1975). Amodal completion and phenomenal shrinkage of surfaces in the visual field. Italian Journal of Psychology, 2, 187-195.
23. LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., FUJITA, N., & FUKUSHIMA, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 906-921.
24. LUCCIO, R. (1983). Effetti dimensionali del completamento amodale [Dimensional effects of amodal completion]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 7, 119-136.
25. MARTENIUK, R. G., LEAVITT, J. L., MACKENZIE, C. L., & ATHENES, S. (1990). Functional relationship between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movemement Science, 9, 149-176.
26. MCKEE, S. P., & WELCH, L. (1992). The precision of size constancy. Vision Research, 32, 1447-1460.
27. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. MILNER, A. D., PERRETT, D. I., JOHNSTON, R. S., BENSON, P. J., JORDAN, T. R., & HEELEY, D. W. (1991). Perception and action in "visual form agnosia." Brain, 114, 405-428.
29. OTTO-DE-HAART, E. G., GAREY, D. P., & MILNE, B. (1999). More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1437-1444.
30. PAVANI, F., BOSCAGLI, I., BENVENUTI, F., RABUFFETTI, M., & FARNE, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
31. PERENIN, M., & VIGHETTO, A. (1983). Optic ataxia: A specific disorder in visuomotor coordination. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Spatially oriented behavior (pp. 305-326). New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. PLODOWSKY, A., & JACKSON, S. R. (2001). Getting to grips with the Ebbinghaus illusion. Current Biology, 11, 304-306.
33. POST, R. B., & WELCH, R. B. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception, 25, 569-581.
34. PROFFITT, D. R., BHALLA, M., GOSSWEILER, R., & MIDGETT, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428.
35. TAMPIERI, G. (1979). The shrinkage of amodally completed surfaces in figure-ground situations. Italian Journal of Psychology, 6, 53-57.
36. VEZZANI, S. (1999). Shrinkage and expansion by amodal completion: A critical review. Perception, 28, 935-947.
37. VISHTON, P. M., & CUTTING, J. E. (1995). Veridical size perception for action: Reaching vs. estimating [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36, S358.
38. VISHTON, P. M., CUTTING, J. E., & REA, J. G. (1997). Titchener circles and horizontal-vertical illusions do not affect manual prehension or judgements of absolute size: Müller-Lyer illusion affects both [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36, S643.
39. VISHTON, P. M., REA, J. G., CUTTING J. E., & NUNEZ, L. N. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative vs. absolute, not perception vs. action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
40. WRAGA, M., CREEM, S. H., & PROFFITT, D. R. (2000). Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration. Psychological Science, 11, 239-243.
41. ZANUTTINI, L. (1977). Amodal shrinkage during condition of illusory dilatation of surfaces. Italian Journal of Psychology, 4, 101-111.