Evolution of mutational robustness

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 522, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 3-11

  Wilke, Claus O ^a   Adami, Christoph ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mutation selection balance; Mutational robustness; Neutral mutation; Quasispecies

Indexed keywords

ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0037469371     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00307-X     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Kimura M., Maruyama T. The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics. 54:1966;1337-1351.
2. Haldane J.B.S. The effect of variation on fitness. Am. Nat. 71:1937;337-349.
3. Muller H.J. Our load of mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2:1950;111-176.
4. J.F. Crow, Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection, in: K. Kojima (Ed.), Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970, pp. 128-177.
5. Kondrashov A.S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 336:1988;435-440.
6. Charlesworth B. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. (Camb.). 55:1990;199-221.
7. Dawson K.J. Evolutionarily stable mutation rates. J. Theor. Biol. 194(1):1998;143-157.
8. Peck J.R., Waxman D. Mutation and sex in a competitive world. Nature. 406(6794):2000;399-404.
9. Keightley P.D., Eyre-Walker A. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Science. 290(5490):2000;331-333.
10. Agrawal A.F. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature. 411(6838):2001;692-695.
11. Siller S. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex. Nature. 111:2001;689-692.
12. van Nimwegen E., Crutchfield J.P., Huynen M. Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;9716-9720.
13. Bornberg-Bauer E., Chan H.S. Modeling evolutionary landscapes: mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;10689-10694.
14. Wilke C.O. Adaptive evolution on neutral networks. Bull. Math. Biol. 63:2001;715-730.
15. M. Eigen, P. Schuster, The Hypercycle - A Principle of Natural Self-Organization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.
16. Eigen M., McCaskill J., Schuster P. Molecular quasispecies. J. Phys. Chem. 92:1988;6881-6891.
17. Eigen M., McCaskill J., Schuster P. The molecular quasispecies. Adv. Chem. Phys. 75:1989;149-263.
18. Domingo E., Holland J.J. RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 51:1997;151-178.
19. Burch C.L., Chao L. Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood. Nature. 406:2000;625-628.
20. E. Domingo, C.K. Biebricher, M. Eigen, J.J. Holland, Quasispecies and RNA Virus Evolution: Principles and Consequences, Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX, 2001.
21. Drake J.W. Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:1993;4171-4175.
22. Drake J.W., Holland J.J. Mutation rates among RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;13910-13913.
23. R. Bürger, The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2000.
24. Baake E., Gabriel W. Biological evolution through mutation, selection, and drift: an introductory review. Ann. Rev. Comp. Phys. 7:2000;203-264.
25. Baake E., Wagner H. Mutation-selection models solved exactly with methods of statistical mechanics. Genet. Res. (Camb.). 78:2001;93-117.
26. Wilke C.O. Selection for fitness versus selection for robustness in RNA secondary structure folding. Evolution. 55:2001;2412-2420.
27. C.A. Voigt, S.L. Mayo, Z.-G. Wang, F. Arnold, Directing the evolvable: Utilizing robustness in in vitro evolution, in: E. Jen (Ed.), Robustness, in press.
28. T.E. Harris, The Theory of Branching Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963.
29. Demetrius L., Schuster P., Sigmund K. Polynucleotide evolution and branching processes. Bull. Math. Biol. 47:1985;239-262.
30. Schuster P., Swetina J. Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization. Bull. Math. Biol. 50:1988;635-660.
31. Wilke C.O., Adami C. The biology of digital organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;528-532.
32. Wilke C.O., Wang J.L., Ofria C., Lenski R.E., Adami C. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rate leads to survival of the flattest. Nature. 412:2001;331-333.
33. C.O. Wilke, Probability of fixation of an advantageous mutant in a viral quasispecies, Genetics, in press.
34. Domingo E., Sabo D., Taniguchi T., Weissmann C. Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity of an RNA phage population. Cell. 13:1978;735-744.
35. Steinhauer D.A., de la Torre J.C., Meier E., Holland J.J. Extreme heterogeneity in populations of vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Virol. 63:1989;2072-2080.
36. de la Torre J.C., Holland J.J. RNA virus quasispecies populations can suppress vastly superior mutant progeny. J. Virol. 64:1990;6278-6281.
37. Yuste E., Moya A., Lopez-Galindez C. Frequency-dependent selection in human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Gen. Virol. 83(1):2002;103-106.
38. Elena S.F., Miralles R., Moya A. Frequency-dependent selection in a mammalian RNA virus. Evolution. 51(3):1997;984-987.
39. Jenkins G.M., Worobey M., Woelk C.H., Holmes E.C. Evidence for the non-quasispecies evolution of RNA viruses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2001;987-994.
40. Holmes E.C., Moya A. Is the quasispecies concept relevant to RNA viruses? J. Virol. 76:2002;460-462.
41. Freeland S.J., Hurst L.D. Load minimization of the genetic code: history does not explain the pattern. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 265:1998;2111-2119.
42. Wagner A., Stadler P.F. Viral RNA and evolved mutational robustness. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.). 285:1999;119-127.
43. Wagner A. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nat. Genet. 24:2000;355-361.
44. Gibson G., Wagner G. Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory? BioEssays. 22:2000;372-380.
45. Waddington C.H. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature. 150:1942;563-565.
46. Mather K. Genetical control of stability in development. Heredity. 17:1953;297-336.
47. Young J.C., Mozarefi I., Hartl F.U. Hsp90: a specialized but essential protein-folding tool. J. Cell Biol. 154:2001;267-273.
48. Rutherford S.L., Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 396:1998;336-342.
49. Queitsch C., Sangster T.A., Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature. 417:2002;618-624.
50. Wagner G.P., Chiu C.-H., Hansen T.F. Is Hsp90 a regulator of evolvability? J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.). 285:1999;116-118.
51. Krakauer D.C., Plotkin J.B. Redundancy, anti-redundancy, and the robustness of genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;1405-1409.
52. Wagner A. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2001;1283-1292.
53. Boerlijst M.C., Bonhoeffer S., Nowak M.A. Viral quasispecies and recombination. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 263:1996;1577-1584.