Self-sorting: The exception or the rule?

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 16, 2003, Pages 4831-4835

  Wu, Anxin ^a   Isaacs, Lyle ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR RECOGNITION;

AGGLOMERATION; PHASE EQUILIBRIA; SOLUTIONS; THERMODYNAMICS;

SELF ASSEMBLY;

CALIXARENE; IONOPHORE; PYRIMIDINONE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UREIDOPYRIMIDONE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; HYPOTHESIS; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMODYNAMICS;

BINDING, COMPETITIVE; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; CALIXARENES; HYDROGEN BONDING; IONOPHORES; KINETICS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PYRIMIDINONES; TEMPERATURE; UREA;

EID: 0037462123     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja028913b     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. (a) Lehn, J.-M. Science 2002, 295, 2400-2403.
2. (b) Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2097-2102.
3. (a) Jolliffe. K. A.; Timmerman, P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 933-937.
4. (b) Cai, M.; Shi, X.; Sidorov, V.; Fabris, D.; Lam, Y.-F.; Davis, J. T. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 661-671.
5. (c) Corbin, P. S.; Lawless, L. J.; Li, Z.; Ma, Y.; Witmer, M. J.; Zimmerman, S. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5099-5104.
6. (d) Ma, Y.; Kolotuchin, S. V.; Zimmerman, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13757-13769.
7. (e) Wu, A.; Chakraborty. A.; Fettinger, J. C.; Flowers, R. A., II.; Isaacs, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41, 4028-4031.
8. (a) Krämer, R.; Lehn, J.-M.; Marquis-Rigault, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 5394-5398.
9. (b) Caulder, D. L.; Raymond, K. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1440-1442.
10. (c) Enemark, E. J.; Stack, T. D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 932-935.
11. (d) Stiller, R.; Lehn, J.-M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 977-982.
12. (e) Taylor, P. N.; Anderson, H. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11538-11545.
13. (f) Albrecht, M.; Schneider, M.; Röttele, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 557-559.
14. (g) Kondo, T.; Oyama, K.-I.; Yoshida, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2001, 40, 894-897.
15. (a) Bilgiçer, B.; Xing, X.; Kumar, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11815-11816.
16. (b) Schnarr, N. A.; Kennan, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 667-671.
17. (a) Rowan, S. J.; Hamilton, D. G.; Brady, P. A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2578-2579.
18. (b) Rowan, S. J.; Reynolds, D. J.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5804-5814.
19. For a review regarding the preference for homomeric aggregates in natural systems, see: Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000, 29, 105-153.
20. (a) Masood, M. A.; Enemark, E. J.; Stack, T. D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 928-932.
21. (b) Prins, L. J.; Huskens, J.; de Jong, F.; Timmerman, P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Nature 1999, 398, 498-502.
22. (c) Vincent, J.-M.; Philouze, C.; Pianet, I.; Verlhac, J.-B. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3595-3599.
23. (d) Shi, X.; Fettinger, J. C.; Cai, M.; Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 3124-3127
24. (e) Shi, X.; Fettinger, J., C.; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6738-6739.
25. (f) Marguly, E.; McDonald, R.; Branda, N. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3169-3172.
26. (g) Cooks, R. G.; Zhang, D.; Koch, K. J.; Gozzo, F. C.; Eberlin, M. N. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 3646-3655.
27. (h) Saghatelian, A.; Yokobayashi, Y.; Soltani, K.; Ghadiri, M. R. Nature 2001, 409, 797-801.
28. (i) Amendola, V.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Gianelli, L.; Maggi, C.; Mangano, C.; Pallavicini, P.; Zema, M. Inorg. Chem. 2001. 40, 3579-3587.
29. (j) Isaacs, L.; Witt, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41, 1905-1907.
30. (k) Ishida, Y.; Aida, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10417-10419.
31. For social isomers, see: Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J. Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12074-12075.
32. 1H NMR is that it is unable to detect minor species (< 3%). This limitation is probably larger in this study since crossover aggregates are likely to be less symmetrical than the self-sorted species.
33. (a) Castellano, R. K.; Nuckolls, C.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999. 121, 11156-11163.
34. (b) Wyler, R.; de Mendoza, J.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32. 1699-1701.
35. (c) Hof, F.; Palmer, L. C.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Chem. Ed. 2001, 78, 1519-1521.
36. Beijer, F. H.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6791-6769.
37. Simanek, E. E.; Wazeer, M. I. M.; Mathias, J. P.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4904-4909,
38. 1H NMR spectra of the individual components from that of the mixture. Unfortunately, spectral broadening in the mixture which can be due to either dynamic exchange processes within the homomeric aggregates of crossover heteromeric aggregates, makes spectral subtraction uninformative. We also performed EXSY and selective ID ROESY experiments. but did not observe signals that could be assigned to crossover aggregates.
39. A under the constraints employed.