A general methodology for the synthesis of transition metal pnictide nanoparticles from pnictate precursors and its application to iron-phosphorus phases

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 14, 2003, Pages 4038-4039

  Stamm, Kimber L ^a   Garno, Jayne C ^a   Liu, Gang yu ^b   Brock, Stephanie L ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FERRIC PHOSPHATE; IRON; METAL; PHOSPHORUS; PNICTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE TRANSITION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0037427236     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja028180v     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Leslie-Pelecky, D. L.; Rieke, R. D. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1770-1783.
2. Alivisatos, A. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13226-13239.
3. Guzelian, A. A.; Katari, J. E. B.; Kadavanich, A. V.; Banin, U.; Hamad, K.; Juban, E.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Wolters, R. H.; Arnold, C. C.; Heath, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 7212-7219.
4. (a) Mićić, O. I.; Curtis, C. J.; Jones, K. M.; Sprague, J. R.; Nozik, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 4966-4969.
5. (b) Coffer, J. L.; Johnson, M. A.; Zhang, L.; Wells, R. L.; Janik, J. F. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 2671-2673.
6. (c) Kher, S. S.; Wells R. L. Nanostruct. Mater. 1996, 7, 591-603.
7. (d) Peng, X.; Wickham, J.; Alivisatos, A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5343-5344.
8. Hulliger, F. Struct. Bonding 1968, 4, 83-229.
9. 6c,d
10. (b) Lukehart, C. M.; Milne, S. B.; Stock, S. R. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 903-908.
11. (c) Xie, Y.; Lu, J.; Yan, P.; Jiang, X.; Qian, Y. J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 155, 42-45.
12. (d) Xie, Y.; Lu, J.; Yan, P.; Jiang, X.; Qian, Y. Chem. Lett. 2000, 114-115.
13. Gopalakrishnan, J.; Pandey, S.; Rangan, K. K. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 2113-2116.
14. 5
15. 3 was treated with crystalline H3PO4 and tri-n-octylamine in tris-2-ethylhexylphosphonate (TEHP) at 160 °C overnight, followed by precipitation with methanol. The resultant nanoparticles have an Fe:P ratio of 0.92 ± 5% (ICP-MS) and are soluble in pyridine, toluene, or hexane.
16. (b) Riwotzki, K.; Meyssamy, H.; Kornowski, A.; Haase, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2824-2828.
17. 10d
18. (b) Kolbe, W. F.; Ogletree, D. F.; Salmeron, M. B. Ultramicroscopy 1992, 42, 1113-1117.
19. (c) Liu, G.-Y.; Fenter, P.; Chidsey, C. E. D.; Ogletree, D. F.; Eisenberger, P.; Salmeron, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4301-4306.
20. (d) Wadu-Mesthrige, K.; Amro, N.; Garno, J. C.; Cruchon-Dupeyrat, S.; Liu, G.-Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 175-176, 391-398.
21. Lateral AFM sizes are a convolution of tip geometry. Without aggressive deconvolution, it is more reliable to use measurements of nanoparticle heights. Over 150 cursor profiles were analyzed for average particle size determinations.
22. 3). all reduction reactions were either conducted in, or vented to. a fume hood.
23. Powder diffraction file (PDF) data were obtained from the ICDD-PDF database, release 2000.
24. Chen, Z. X.; Smith, G. C.; Putman, C. A. J.; ter Voert, E. J. M. Catal. Lett. 1998, 50, 49-57.
25. AFM imaging of plain mica substrates indicates that the surface remains atomically flat under the annealing conditions employed here.
26. 8 will probe whether the reduction temperature dependence of the phase transformation is identical to that observed in the bulk, or if there are differences due to size effects, and this will be presented in a full paper.
27. Binding energy data are available online at http://srdata.nist.gov/xps/.