Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: A comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 121, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 458-465

  Schiefer, Ulrich ^a   Flad, Mark ^a   Stumpp, Florian ^a   Malsam, Alexander ^a   Paetzold, Jens ^a   Vonthein, Reinhard ^b   Denk, P Oliver ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOTOMA; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PERIMETRY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0037386729     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.121.4.458     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Schiefer U, Stercken-Sorrenti G, Dietrich TJ, Friedrich M, Benda N. Fundus-Orientierte Perimetrie: Evaluation eines neuen Gesichtsfeld-Untersuchungsverfahren bezüglich der Detektion von Angioskotomen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1996;209:62-71.
2. Schiefer U, Witte A, inventors; Perimetrisches Untersuchungsverfahren: Fundusgestützte Perimetrie II. Deutsches Patentamt München, Az 196219612 1996;1-15.
3. Schiefer U, Stercken-Sorrenti G, Dietrich TJ, Friedrich M, Benda N. Fundus oriented perimetry. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1997:107-109.
4. Schiefer U, Selig B, Dietrich TJ. Automated static campimetry with locally enhanced spatial resolution. In: Wall M, Wild JM, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1999:261-272.
5. Benda N, Dietrich TJ, Schiefer U. Fitting angioscotomas. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1996/1997 New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1997:207-210.
6. Benda N, Dietrich TJ, Schiefer U. Models for the description of angioscotomas. Vision Res. 1999;39:1889-1896.
7. Schiefer U, Benda N, Dietrich TJ, Selig B, Hofmann C, Schiller J. Angioscotoma detection with fundus-oriented perimetry. Vision Res. 1999;39:1897-1909.
8. Wabbels B, Schiefer U, Treutwein B, Benda N, Stercken-Sorrenti G. Automated perimetry with bright and dark stimuli. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995;4:217-221.
9. Dietrich TJ, Friedrich M, Selig B, Benda N, Schiefer U. Application of video display units for campimetric purposes. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1997:471.
10. Dietrich TJ, Selig B, Friedrich M, Benda N, Schiefer U. Calibration routines for video display units for perimetric examinations [abstract]. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996; 5(suppl 1):125.
11. Schwabe R, Vonthein R, Ata N, Paetzold J, Dietrich TJ, Schiefer U. Modeling the hill of vision. In: Wall M, Mills RP, eds. Perimetry Update 2000/2001. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 2001:71-79.
12. Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109: 1684-1689.
13. Westcott MC, McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:452-459.
14. Hodapp E, Parrish RU, Anderson DR. Classification of Glaucomatous Field Loss by HFA According to Hodapp et al. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1993:52-61.
15. Hatz H. Diagnose und therapie der polymyalgia rheumatica. Start. 1991;4:28-34.
16. Morales J, Weitzman ML, González de la Rosa M. Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:134-142.
17. Morales J. New perimetry algorithm test sensitivity points relative to each other: results in 3 minutes. Ocul Surg News. 1997:8.
18. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. SITA fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:431-437.
19. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375.
20. Langerhorst CT, Carenini LL, Bakker D, van den Berg TJTP, De Bie-Raakman MAC. Comparison of SITA and dynamic strategies with the same examination grid. In: Wall M, Wild JM, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1999:17-24.
21. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Patella VM. Glaucoma follow-up when converting from long to short perimetric threshold tests. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:489-493.
22. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Cello KE, Quigg JM, Kass MA, Gordnon MO. Severity of the types of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:84.
23. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, et al. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118: 1187-1194.
24. Schwartz M, Lazarov-Spiegler O, Moalem G, Yoles E. Dialogue between traumatized optic nerve axons and immune cells: implications for survival and regrowth [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:876.
25. Yoles E, Schwartz M. Degeneration of spared axons following partial white matter lesion: implications for optic nerve neuropathies. Exp Neurol. 1998;153:1-7.
26. Schwartz M, Yoles E. Self-destructive and self-protective processes in the damaged optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:349-351.
27. Langerhorst CT, Carenini LL, Bakker D, De Bie-Raakman MAC. Measurements for description of very early glaucomatous field defects. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. New York, NY: Kugler Publications; 1997:67-73.
28. Westcott MC, Garway-Heath DF, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RH. Is conventional perimetry sufficient for the evaluation of the nasal step in glaucoma? [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:581.
29. Schiefer U, Malsam A, Flad M, et al. Evaluation of glaucomatous visual field loss with locally condensed grids using fundus-oriented perimetry (FOP). Eur J Ophthalmol. 2001;11:57-62.
30. Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Kruse FE, Fendrich T, Völcker HE. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995;4:197-202.
31. Kani K, Ogita Y. Fundus controlled perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1978; 19:341-350.
32. Ohta Y, Amoto TM, Harasawa K. Experimental fundus photo perimeter and its application. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1978;1:351-358.
33. Ferguson RD, Magill JC, Frish MB, Elsner AE, Webb RH. The tracking SLO: second generation retinal imaging performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42:794.
34. Weber J, Dannheim F, Dannheim D. The topographical relationship between optic disc and visual field in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1990;68:568-574.
35. Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:391-395.
36. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2144-2153.
37. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
38. Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE, Standardi CL, and the CIGTS Study Group. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and base-line characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:653-662.
39. Schiefer U, Strasburger H, Becker ST, et al. Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction. Vision Res. 2001;41:2157-2164.
40. Wabbels B, Kolling G. Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit unterschiedlichen Prüfgeschwindigkeiten. Ophthalmologe. 2001;98:168-173.
41. Sample PA, Williams JM, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Visual field classification comparing neural networks, statistical classifiers, Statpac, and a glaucoma expert [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:154.
42. Jürgens C, Koch T, Burth R, Schiefer U, Zell A. Classification of perimetric results and reduction of number of test locations using artifical neural networks [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:846.
43. Brigatti LO, Ho L, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Automatic identification of glaucomatous visual field patterns with artificial neural networks [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:151.
44. Lin A, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J. Neural networks to identify glaucomactous visual field progression [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:152.
45. Sample PA. What does functional testing tell us about optic nerve damage? Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45(suppl 3):S319-S334.