Self-assessment in simulation-based surgical skills training

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 185, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 319-322

  MacDonald, Jeannie ^a   Williams, Reed G ^a   Rogers, David A ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Self assessment; Simulation training; Technical skills

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURGICAL TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF-EVALUATION PROGRAMS; SURGERY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 0037376754     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01420-4     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ginsburg S., Regehr G., Hatala R., et al. Context, conflict, and resolution a conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med. 75:2000;S6-11.
2. Gordon M.J. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med. 12:1991;762-769.
3. Jankowski J., Crombie I., Block R., et al. Self-assessment of medical knowledge do physicians overestimate or underestimate? J R Coll Phys London. 25:1991;306-308.
4. Regehr G., Hoges B., Tiberius R., Lofchy J. Measuring self-assessment skills an innovative relative ranking model. Acad Med. 71:1996;S52-54.
5. Risucci D.A., Tortolani A.J., Ward R.J. Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors and peers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 169:1989;519-526.
6. Anthoney T.R. A discrepancy in objective and subjective measures of knowledge do some medical students with learning problems delude themselves? Med Educ. 20:1986;17-22.
7. Henbest R.J., Fehrsen G.S. Preliminary study at the Medical University of Southern Africa on student self-assessments as a means of evaluation. J Med Educ. 60:1985;66-68.
8. Gallagher A.G., McClure N., McGuigan J., et al. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR). Endoscopy. 31:1999;310-313.
9. Pohl D, Eubanks TR, Kao CC, et al. Synthetic material simulation improves performance laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an animate model. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.
10. Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, et al. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomized controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. MMVR 1998;124-30.
11. Smith C.D., Farrell T.M., McNatt S.S., Metreveli R.E. Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg. 181:2001;547-550.
12. Rogers D.A., Regehr G., Howdieshell T.R., et al. The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skills training. Am J Surg. 179:2000;341-343.
13. Rogers D.A., Regehr G., Yeh K.A., Howdieshell T.R. Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical technical skill. Am J Surg. 175:1998;508-510.