US regionalism and rationality

Urban Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 447-462

  Basolo, Victoria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLICY ANALYSIS; REGIONAL PLANNING; REGIONALISM; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037342677     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000053860     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. BALDASSARE, M., HASSOL, J., HOFFMAN, W. and KANAREK, A. (1996) Possible planning roles for regional government: a survey of city planning directors in California, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(1), pp. 17-29.
2. BASOLO, V. (1999) The impacts of inter-city competition and intergovernmental factors on local affordable housing programs, Housing Policy Debate, 10(3), pp. 659-688.
3. BASOLO, V. (2000) City spending on economic development versus affordable housing: does inter-city competition or local politics drive decisions?, Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(3), pp. 317-332.
4. BASOLO, V. and HASTINGS, D. (1999) The unfulfilled promise of regional housing solutions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Chicago, October.
5. BERG, B. and KANTOR, P. (1996) New York: the politics of conflict and avoidance, in: H. V. SAVITCH and R. K. VOGEL (Eds) Regional Politics, pp. 25-50. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6. BLAIR, J. P. (1995) Local Economic Development: Analysis and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. BOLLENS, S. A. (1986) A political-ecological analysis of income inequality in the metropolitan area, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(2), pp. 221-241.
8. BOLLENS, S. A. (1997a) Revitalizing America's cities: searching for solutions, Stanford Law & Policy Review, 8(2), pp. 11-23.
9. BOLLENS, S. A. (1997b) Fragments of regionalism: the limits of southern California governance, Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1), pp. 105-122.
10. BOWMAN, A. O. (1987) Competition for economic development among southeastern cities, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, pp. 511-527.
11. BRENNAN, G. and BUCHANAN, J. (1977) Towards a tax constitution for Leviathan, Journal of Public Economics, 8, pp. 255-273.
12. BURNS, N. (1994) The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. CORTAZAR, R. (1997) Non-redundant groups, the assurance game and the origins of collective action, Public Choice, 92, pp. 41-53.
14. DAWES, R., MCTAVISH, J. and SHAKLEE, H. (1977) Behavior, communication and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), pp. 1-11.
15. DOLAN, D. A. (1990) Local government fragmentation: does it drive up the cost of government?, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26(2), pp. 28-45.
16. DOWDING, K., JOHN, P. and BIGGS, S. (1994) Tiebout: a survey of the empirical literature, Urban Studies, 31(4/5), pp. 767-797.
17. DOWNS, A. (1994) New Visions for Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution and Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
18. DREIER, P., MOLLENKOPF, J. and SWANSTROM, T. (2001) Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-first Century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
19. FLEISCHMANN, A., GREEN, G. P. and KWONG, T. M. (1992) What's a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies, Western Political Quarterly, 45, pp. 677-699.
20. FORBES, K. F. and ZAMPELLI, E. M. (1989) Is Leviathan a mythical beast?, The American Economic Review, 79(3), pp. 568-577.
21. FRANZEN, A. (1995) Group size and one-shot collective action, Rationality and Society, 7(2), pp. 183-200.
22. FRUG, G. E. (1988) Local Government Law. St Paul: West Publishing.
23. FRUG, G. E. (1999) City Making: Building Communities Without Building Walls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. GERCKENS, L. C. (1988) Historical development of American city planning, in: F. S. So and J. GETZELS (Eds) The Practice of Local Government Planning, 2nd edn, pp. 20-59. Washington, DC: ICMA.
25. GOODMAN, J. S. (1980) The Dynamics of Urban Growth and Politics. New York: Macmillan.
26. HALL, P. (1991) Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. London: Basil Blackwell.
27. HAMILTON, D. K. (2000) Organizing government structure and governance functions in metropolitan areas in response to growth and change: a critical overview, Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(1), pp. 65-84.
28. HARDIN, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, pp. 1243-1248.
29. HARDIN, R. (1982) Collective Action. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. HARDIN, R. (1997) Economic theories of the state, in: D. C. MUELLER (Ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, pp. 21-34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. HARRIGAN, J. J. (1989) Political Change in the Metropolis. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
32. HAWKINS, B. W. and DYE, T. R. (Eds) (1971) Politics in the Metropolis. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
33. HECHTER, M. (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34. HECKATHORN, D. D. (1989) Collective action and the second-order free rider problem, Rationality and Society, 1(1), pp. 78-100.
35. HOFFMAN, E. (1997) Public choice experiments, in: D. C. MUELLER (Ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, pp. 415-426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. INMAN, R. P. and RUBINFELD, D. L. (1997) The political economy of federalism, in: D. C. MUELLER (Ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, pp. 73-105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. ISAAC, R. M. and WALKER, J. M. (1988) Communication and free-riding behavior: the voluntary contribution mechanism, Economic Inquiry, 26, pp. 585-608.
38. KANAREK, A. and BALDASSARE, M. (1996) Preferences for state and regional planning efforts among California mayors and city planning directors, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), pp. 93-102.
39. LEVY, R. E. (1997) Federalism and collective action, Kansas Law Review, 45, pp. 1241-1274.
40. LEWIS, P. G. (1998) Regionalism and representation: measuring and assessing representation in metropolitan planning organizations, Urban Affairs Review, 33(96), pp. 839-853.
41. LINDSTROM, B. (1998) Regional governance and sustainable growth: nine councils of government in northeastern Illinois, Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3), pp. 327-342.
42. LOWERY, D. (1982) Public choice when services are costs: the divergent case of assessment administration, American Journal of Political Science, 26, pp. 57-76.
43. LYONS, W. E., LOWERY, D. and DEHOOG, R. H. (1992) The Politics of Dissatisfaction. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
44. MITCHELL-WEAVER, C., MILLER, D. and DEAL, R. JR (2000) Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA, Urban Studies, 27(5/6), pp. 851-876.
45. MOLOTCH, H. (1976) The city as a growth machine, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 309-332.
46. MORRILL, R. L. (1989) Regional governance in the United States: For whom?, Environment and Planning C, 7, pp. 13-26.
47. MUELLER, D. (1979) Public Choice. London: Cambridge University Press.
48. NELSON, A. C. and FOSTER, K. A. (1999) Metropolitan governance structure and income growth, Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(3), pp. 309-324.
49. NELSON, M. A. (1987) Searching for Leviathan: comment and extension, The American Economic Review, 77(1), pp. 198-204.
50. NORRIS, D. (2001) Whither metropolitan governance? Urban Affairs Review, 36(4), pp. 532-550.
51. NUNN, S. and ROSENTRAUB, M. S. (1997) Dimensions of interjurisdictional cooperation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), pp. 205-219.
52. OAKERSON, R. J. (1999) Governance structures and problem-solving in metropolitan areas: responding to (Downsian) growth-related problems. Paper presented to WOW2, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, June.
53. OATES, W. E. (Ed.) (1977) The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
54. OATES, W. E. (1985) Searching for Leviathan: an empirical study, The American Economic Review, 75(4), pp. 748-757.
55. OLSON, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. ORFIELD, M. (1997) Metropolitics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution and Cambridge, MA: The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
57. OSTROM, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. OSTROM, E. (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action, American Political Science Review, 92(1), pp. 1-22.
59. OSTROM, E. and WALKER, J. (1997) Neither markets nor states: linking transformation processes in collective action arenas, in: D. C. MUELLER (Ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, pp. 35-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. PASTOR, M. JR., DREIER, P., GRIGSBY, J. E., III and LOPEZ-GARZA, M. (2000) Regions that Work: How Cities and Suburbs Can Grow Together. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
61. PETERSON, P. E. (1981) City Limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62. RUSK, D. (1993) Cities without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
63. RUSK, D. (1999) Inside Game Outside Game. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
64. SAMUELSON, P. A. (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, pp. 386-389.
65. SAVITCH, H. V. (1993) Ties that bind: central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region, Economic Development Quarterly, 7, pp. 341-357.
66. SAVITCH, H. V. and VOGEL, R. K. (1996) Perspectives for the present and lessons for the future, in: H. V. SAVITCH and R. K. VOGEL (Eds) Regional Politics: American in a Post-city Age, pp. 275-302. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
67. SAVITCH, H. V. and VOGEL, R. K. (2000) Path to new regionalism, State and Local Government Review 32(3), pp. 158-168.
68. SCHNEIDER, M. (1989) The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
69. SINGLETON, S. (1999) Commons problems, collective action and efficiency, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(3), pp. 367-391.
70. STEPHENS, G. R. and WIKSTROM, N. (2000) Metropolitan Government and Governance: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Analysis, and the Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. SWANSTROM, T. (1996) Ideas matter: reflections on the new regionalism, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 2(2), pp. 5-21.
72. TIEBOUT, C. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp. 416-424.
73. US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (2001a) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Communities Program (http://www.hud.gov/ progdesc/cdbgent.cfm).
74. US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (2001b) Congressional Justifications for 2001 Estimates (http://www.hud. gov/budget01/justif/cpd/rc.cfm).
75. WALKER, D. B. (1987) Snow White and the 17 dwarfs: from metro cooperation to governance, National Civic Review, 76, pp. 14-28.
76. ZAX, J. (1989) Is there a leviathan in your neighborhood?, The American Economic Review, 79(3), pp. 560-567.
77. ZIEGLER, D. J. and BRUNN, S. D. (1980) Geopolitical fragmentation and the pattern of growth and need: defining the cleavage between Sunbelt and Frostbelt metropolises, in: S. D. BRUNN and J. O. WHEELER (Eds) The American Metropolitan System: Present and Future, pp. 77-92. New York: V. H. Winston and Sons.