Regionalism and representation: Measuring and assessing representation in metropolitan planning organizations

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 839-853

  Lewis, Paul G ^a  

^a PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL GOVERNMENT; METROPOLITAN AREA; POLITICAL REPRESENTATION; REGIONALISM; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLITICS;

USA, CALIFORNIA;

EID: 0031663715     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107808749803300606     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1995. MPO capacity: Improving the capacity of metropolitan planning organizations to help implement national transportation policies. Report A-130. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. Benjamin, S. B., J. Kincaid, and B. D. McDowell. 1994. MPOs and weighted voting. Intergovernmental Perspectives (Spring): 31-35.
3. Cisneros, H. G. 1995. Regionalism: The new geography of opportunity. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
4. Downs, A. 1996. The devolution revolution: Why Congress is shifting a lot of power to the wrong levels. Brookings Policy Brief No. 3. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5. Francois, F. B. 1995. State perspective. In Institutional aspects of metropolitan transportation planning, 8-12. Conference proceedings. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
6. Gage, R. W., and B. D. McDowell. 1995. ISTEA and the role of MPOs in the new transportation environment. Publius 25 (3): 133-54.
7. Howe, L. 1994. Winging it with ISTEA. Planning (January): 11-14.
8. Lewis, P. G. 1996. Shaping suburbia: How political institutions organize urban development. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
9. Lim, G. C., ed. 1983. Regional planning. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.
10. McDowell, B. D. 1984. The metropolitan planning organization role in the 1980s. Journal of Advanced Transportation 18 (2): 125-33.
11. Orfield, M. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
12. Peirce, N. R., with C. R. Johnson and J. S. Hall. 1993. Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
13. Rusk, D. 1993. Cities without suburbs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
14. Savitch, H. V., D. Collins, D. Sanders, and J. Markham. 1993. Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs, and the new metropolitan region. Economic Development Quarterly 7 (4): 341-57.
15. Simonetta, R. J. 1995. Transit perspective. In Institutional aspects of metropolitan transportation planning, 12-14. Conference proceedings. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
16. Surface Transportation Policy Project. 1996. Getting a fair share: An analysis of federal transportation spending. Washington, DC: Author.
17. Taagepera, R., and M. S. Shugart. 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
18. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1996. Urban transportation: Metropolitan planning organizations' efforts to meet federal planning requirements. Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, DC: Author.
19. Wikstrom, N. 1977. Councils of governments: A study of political incrementalism. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.