Preferences for state and regional planning efforts among California mayors and city planning directors

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 93-102

  Kanarek, Abby ^a,b   Baldassare, Mark ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Governor's Interagency Cncl G ^*

^c Governor's Interagency Cncl G

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002032369     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9601600202     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adrian, C. R. 1961. Metropology: Folklore and field research. Public Administration Review 21, 148-157.
2. Anglin, R. 1990. Attitudes of urban and nonurban residents towards local growth and growth management. Working Paper 15, Center for Urban Policy Research. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
3. Baldassare, M. 1989. Citizen support for regional government in the new suburbia. Urban Affairs Quarterly 24:460-469.
4. Baldassare, M. 1994a. The image problem of regional government: Factors contributing to suburban opposition. Research in Community Sociology 4:195-208.
5. Baldassare, M. 1994b. Regional variations in support for regional government. Urban Affairs Review 30:275-284.
6. Baldassare, M., J. Hassol, W. Hoffman, and A. Kanarek. 1996. Possible planning roles for regional government: a survey of city planning directors in California. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:17-29.
7. Berke, P. R., and S. P. French. 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13:237-250.
8. Bollens, S. A. 1992. State growth management: interagency frameworks and policy objectives. Journal of the American Planning Association 58:454-466.
9. Bollens, S. 1993. Shadow regionalism and the fragmented metropolis: Organizational responses to urban instability. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of the Collegiate Schools of Planning. Philadelphia.
10. Boschken, H.L. 1977. Public control of land use: Are existing administrative structures appropriate? Public Administration Review 37:495-504.
11. Calavita, N., and R. Caves. 1994. Planners' attitudes toward growth: A comparative case study. Journal of the American Planning Association 60:483-500.
12. California Chapter of the American Planning Association. 1991. Action agenda for the 1990s: A new approach to growth, management and regional planning. Sacramento, CA: Mimeo.
13. California Legislature. 1988. Planning for California's growth. Senate Select Committee. Sacramento, CA: Mimeo.
14. California Legislature. 1989a. Land use and local revenue sharing: Playing the zerosum game. Senate Local Government Committee. Sacramento, CA: Mimeo.
15. California Legislature. 1989b. Does California need a policy to manage urban growth? Senate Urban Growth Policy Project. Sacramento, CA: Mimeo.
16. California Legislature. 1990. Growth management: Executive efforts, legislative proposals and building consensus. Assembly Committee on Local Government. Mimeograph. Sacramento, CA.
17. Cisneros, H. G. 1995. Regionalism: The new geography of opportunity. Washington: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
18. Conner, K. 1991. Other state's growth management experiences. Sacramento: Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
19. Dalton, L. C. and R. J. Burby. 1994. Mandates, plans and planner: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association 60:444-61.
20. Danielson, M. 1976. The politics of exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. DeGrove, J. M. 1992. Planning and growth management in the states. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Use Policy.
22. DeGrove, J. M., and P. M. Metzger. 1993. Growth management and the integrated roles of state, regional and local governments. In Growth management: The planning challenge of the 1990s, ed. J. Stein, 3-17. Newbuty Park: Sage.
23. Dolan, D. 1990. Local government fragmentation: Does it drive up the cost of government? Urban Affairs Quarterly 26:28-45.
24. Donovan, T., M. Neiman, and S. Brumbaugh. 1994. Two dimensions of local growth strategies. In Suburban communities: Change and policy responses, ed. M. Baldassare, 153-172. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
25. Dye, T. R. 1964. Urban political integration: conditions associated with annexation in American cities. Midwest Journal of Political Science 8:430-66.
26. Dye, T. R., C. S. Leibman, O. P. Williams, and H. Herman. 1966.Differentiation and cooperation in a metropolitan area. In Metropolitan politics, ed. M. Danielson, 261-271. Boston: Little Brown.
27. Edwards, J. Terry, and T. Galloway. 1981. Freedom and equality: Dimensions of political ideology among city planners and city managers. Urban Affairs Quarterly 17:173-193.
28. Friedmann, J. and R. Bloch. 1990. American exceptionalism in regional planning, 1933-2000. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 14:576-601.
29. Fulton, W. 1993. Sliced on the cutting edge: Growth management and growth control in California. In Growth management: The planning challenge of the 1990s, ed. J. Stein, 113-128. Newbury Park: Sage.
30. Gale, D. E. 1992. Eight state sponsored growth management programs: a comparative analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 59:425-439.
31. Gale, D. E. and S. Hart. 1992. Public support for local comprehensive planning under statewide growth management: Insights from Maine. Journal of Planning Education and Research 11:192-205.
32. Gerston, L. N. and P. J. Haas. 1993. Political support for regional government in the 1990s: Growing in the suburbs? Urban Affairs Quarterly 29:154-163.
33. Hahn, A. and C. Dyballa. 1981. State environmental planning and local influence: A comparison of three regional natural resource management agencies. Journal of the American Planning Association 47:324-339.
34. Hawkins, B. W. 1967. Life style, demographic distance and voter support of city-county consolidation. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 48:325-337.
35. Innes, J. E. 1993. Implementing state growth management in the U.S.: Strategies for Coordination. In Growth management: The planning challenge of the 1990s, ed. J. Stein, 18-43. Newbury Park: Sage.
36. Kenyon, D. A. 1988. Interjurisdictional tax and policy competition: Good or bad for the federal system? Washington, DC: United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
37. Kirlin, J. 1989. Improving regional governance. California Policy Choices 5:187-210.
38. Kirlin, J. 1993. Citistates and regional governance. National Civic Review 82:371-379.
39. Knaap, G. 1987. Self interest and voter support for Oregon's land use controls. Journal of the American Planning Association 53:92-97.
40. Knaap, G. and A. C. Nelson. 1992. The regulated landscape:Lessons on state land use planning from Oregon. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Use Policy.
41. Landis, J. 1992. Regional growth management. In California Policy Choices, ed. J. Kirlin, vol. 8, 83-126. Los Angeles: USC School of Public Administration.
42. Lawrence, B. L. 1988. New Jersey's controversial growth plan. Urban Land 1:18-21.
43. Little Hoover Commission. 1995. Making land use work: Rules to reach our goals. Sacramento, CA.
44. Logan, J. R. and H. L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Logan, J.R. and M. Zhou. 1989. Do suburban growth controls control growth? American Sociological Review 54:461-471.
46. Marando, V. L. 1979. City-county consolidation: reform, regionalism, referenda and requiem. Western Political Quarterly 32:409-421.
47. Medler, J. and A. Mushkatel. 1979. Urban rural class conflict in Oregon land use planning. Western Political Quarterly 32:338-349.
48. Neiman, M. 1982. An exploration into class clustering and local government inequality. In Analyzing urban-service distributions, ed. R. C. Rich, 219-233. Lexington, Kentucky: Lexington Books.
49. Olshansky, R. 1993. The California Environmental Quality Act and local planning. Planning and Public Policy 16:1-4.
50. Ostrom, E. 1974. Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly 53:465-93.
51. Ostrom, V., C. M. Tiebout, and R. Warren. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas. The American Political Science Review 55:831-842.
52. Peterson, P. E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Pincetl, S. 1994. The regional management of growth in California: A history of failure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18:256-274.
54. Popper, F. J. 1992. Rethinking American regional planning. Working Paper 38, Center for Urban Policy Research. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
55. Snowiss, S. 1967. Urban problems and governmental organization. Institute of Government and Public Affairs. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
56. Southern California Association of Governments. 1993. Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan. Los Angeles.
57. State of California. 1989. Preemption of local land use authority in California. Sacramento, CA: Governor's Office of Planning Research.
58. Sybert, R. 1993. Strategic growth: Taking charge of the future. Sacramento, CA:. Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
59. Sybert, R., G. Cox, and C. Whiteside. 1991. Local and regional perspectives on growth management. Sacramento, CA: Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
60. Sybert, R. and A. Quinn. 1992. The regions of California. Sacramento, CA: Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
61. Sybert, R. and A. Rivasplata. 1991. Planning and growth management. Sacramento, CA: Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
62. Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64:416-424.
63. Wallis, A. D. 1992. New life for regionalism? Maybe. National Civic Review 81:19-26.
64. Wickersham, J. H. 1994. The quiet revolution continues: The emerging new model for state growth management statutes. Harvard Environmental Law Review 18:489-548.
65. Williams, O. P. 1967. Life-style values and political decentralization in metropolitan areas. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 48:300-310.
66. Williams, K. M. 1993. ISTEA: New directions for transportation. Land Use Law and Zoning Digest 45:3-9.
67. Wolpert, J. 1991. The costs of regional growth. In Our changing cities, ed. J. F. Hart, 170-188. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.