Interaction of GroEL and GroEL/GroES complexes with a nonnative subtilisin variant: A small-angle neutron scattering study

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 141, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 240-258

  Krueger, Susan ^a   Gregurick, Susan K ^b   Zondlo, James ^c   Eisenstein, Edward ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chaperones; Contrast variation; GroEL; GroES; Neutron scattering; Polypeptide substrate binding; Small angle scattering

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; SUBTILISIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULE; NEUTRON SCATTERING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN VARIANT; STOICHIOMETRY;

EID: 0037340757     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00002-9     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alden R.A., Birktoft J.J., Kraut J., Robertus J.D., Wright C.S. Atomic coordinates for subtilisin BPN' (or Novo). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 45:1971;337-344.
2. Boisvert D.C., Wang J., Otwinowski Z.et al. The 2.4. Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP γ S Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
3. Braig K., Simon M., Furuya F., Hainfeld J.F., Horwich A.L. A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin GroEL is localized within a central cavity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;3978-3982.
4. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8. Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
5. Braig K., Adams P.D., Brunger A.T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8. Å resolution Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1083-1094.
6. Burston S.G., Weissman J.S., Farr G.W., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex. Nature. 383:1996;96-99.
7. Chen S., Roseman A.M., Hunter A.S., Wood S.P., Burston S.G., Ranson N.A., Clarke A.R., Saibil H.R. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:1994;261-264.
8. Eisenstein E., Reddy P., Fisher M.T. Overexpression, purification, and properties of GroES from Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 290:1998;119-135.
9. Falke S., Fisher M.T., Gogol E.P. Structural changes in GroEL effected by binding a denatured protein substrate. J. Mol. Biol. 308:2001;569-577.
10. Falke S., Fisher M.T., Gogol E.P. Classification and reconstruction of a heterogeneous set of electron microscopic images: a case study of GroEL-substrate complexes. J. Struct. Biol. 133:2001;203-213.
11. Fenton W.A., Kashl Y., Furtak K., Horwich A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
12. Fink A.L. Molten globules. Shirley B.A. Protein Stability and Folding, Theory and Practice. vol.40:1995;377 Humana Press, New Jersey.
13. Garcia de la Torre J.S.N., Lopez Martinez M.C., Diaz F.G., Lopez Cascales J.J. HYDRO: a computer program for the prediction of hydrodynamic properties of macromolecules. Biophys. J. 67:1994;530-531.
14. Garcia de la Torre J., Huertas M.L., Carrasco B. Calculation of hydrodynamic properties of globular proteins from their atomic-level structure. Biophys. J. 78:2000;719-730.
15. Glinka C.J., Barker J.G., Hammouda B., Krueger S., Moyer J.J., Orts W.J. The 30-meter small angle neutron scattering instruments at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. J. Appl. Cryst. 31:1998;430-445.
16. Guinier A. Small Angle Scattering of X Rays. 1955;Wiley Press, New York.
17. Hansen S. Calculation of small-angle scattering profiles using Monte Carlo simulation. J. Appl. Cryst. 23:1990;334-346.
18. Hartmann W.K., Eisenstein E. Interaction of nonnative polypeptide substrates with the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL. Schneider C. Methods in Molecular Biology. vol. 140:2000;97-109 Humana Press, New Jersey.
19. Heidorn D.B., Trewhella J. Comparison of the crystal and solution structures of calmodulin and troponin C. Biochemistry. 27:1988;909-915.
20. Hubbard T.I., Sander C. The role of heat-shock and chaperone proteins in protein folding: possible molecular mechanisms. Protein Eng. 4:1991;711-717.
21. Hunt J.F., Weaver A.J., Landry S.J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8. Å resolution Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
22. Jacrot B. The study of biological structures by neutron scattering from solution. Rep. Prog. Phys. 39:1976;911-953.
23. Jacrot B., Zaccai G. Determination of molecular weight by neutron scattering. Biopolymers. 20:1981;2413-2426.
24. Kamireddi M., Eisenstein E., Reddy P. Stable expression and rapid purification of Escherichia coli GroEL and GroES chaperonins. Protein Expr. Purif. 11:1997;47-52.
25. Kataoka M., Nishii I., Fujisawa T., Ueki T., Tokunaga F., Goto Y. Structural characterization of the molten globule and native states of apomyoglobin by solution X-ray scattering. J. Mol. Biol. 249:1995;215-228.
26. Kataoka M., Kuwajima K., Tokunaga F., Goto Y. Structural characterization of the molten globule of α-lactalbumin by solution X-ray scattering. Protein Sci. 6:1997;422-430.
27. Lin Z., Eisenstein E. Nucleotide binding-promoted conformational changes release a nonnative polypeptide from the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;1977-1981.
28. McLennan N.F., Girshovich A.S., Lissin N.M., Charters Y., Masters M. The strongly conserved carboxyl-terminus glycine-methionine motif of the Escherichia coli GroEL chaperonin is dispensable. Mol. Microbiol. 7:1993;49-58.
29. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes. 1978;Cambridge University Press, New York.
30. Roseman A.M., Chen S., White H., Braig K., Saibil H.R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
31. Sakigawa C., Taguchi H., Makino Y., Yoshida M. On the maximum size of proteins to stay and fold in the cavity of GroEL underneath GroES. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;21251-21256.
32. Semenyuk A.V., Svergun D.I. J. Appl. Cryst. 24:1991;537-540.
33. Stegmann R., Manakova E., Rossle M., Heumann H., Nieba-Axmann S.E., Pluckthun A., Hermann T., May R.P., Wiedenmann A. Structural changes of the Escherichia coli GroEL-GroES chaperonins upon complex formation in solution: a neutron small angle scattering study. J. Struct. Biol. 121:1998;30-40.
34. Svergun D., Barberato C., Koch M.H. CRYSOL - a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Cryst. 28:1995;768-773.
35. Swanson E. PSSHOW version 19. 1995;University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
36. Thiyagarajan P., Henderson S.J., Joachimiak A. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. Structure. 4:1996;79-88.
37. Weissman I.S. All roads lead to Rome? The multiple pathways of protein folding. Chem. Biol. 2:1995;255-260.
38. Weissman J.S., Rye H.S., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.A., Horwich A.L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:1996;481-490.
39. Xu Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.