Structural changes of the Escherichia coil GroEL-GroES chaperonins upon complex formation in solution: A neutron small angle scattering study

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 30-40

  Stegmann, Renata ^a   Manakova, Elena ^a   Röble, Manfred ^a   Heumann, Hermann ^a   Nieba Axmann, Sabine E ^b   Plückthun, Andreas ^b   Hermann, Thomas ^c   May, Roland P ^d   Wiedenmann, Albrecht ^e  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c INST DE BIOL MOLEC ET CELLULAIRE   (France)

^d INSTITUT LAUE LANGEVIN   (France)

^e HAHN MEITNER INSTITUT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chaperones; GroEL; GroES; Neutron scattering; Small angle scattering

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; NEUTRON SCATTERING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

ESCHERICHIA; ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 0031904407     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3938     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Braig K., Adams P. D., Brünger A. T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1083-1094.
2. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
3. Buchner J. Supervising the fold: Functional principles of molecular chaperones. FASEB J. 10:1996;10-19.
4. Burnett B. P., Horwich A. L., Brooks Low K. A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and confers a pleiotropic phenotype inEscherichia coliK-12. J. Bacteriol. 176:1994;6980-6985.
5. Chen S., Roseman A. M., Hunter A. S., Wood S. P., Burston S. G., Ranson N. A., Clarke A. R., Saibil H. R. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:1994;261-264.
6. Corrales F. J., Fersht A. R. Kinetic significance of GroEL·GroES chaperone activity: An ATPase-gated and-pulsed folding and annealing cage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4509-4512.
7. Durchschlag H., Jaenicke R. Partial specific volume changes of proteins: Ultracentrifugal and viscosimetric studies. Intl. J. Biol. Macromolecules. 5:1983;143-148.
8. Ellis R. J., Hartl F. U. Protein folding in the cell: Competing models of chaperonin function. FASEB J. 10:1996;20-26.
9. Glatter O. A new method for the evaluation of small-angle-scattering data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 10:1977;415-421.
10. Harris J. R., Plückthun A., Zahn R. Transmission electron microscopy of GroEL, GroES, and the symmetrical GroEL/ES complex. J. Struct. Biol. 112:1994;216-230.
11. Hartl F. U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature. 381:1996;571-580.
12. Hunt J. F., Weaver A. J., Landry S. J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37.
13. Ibel K. Comparison of neutron and X-ray scattering of dilute myoglobin solutions. J. Mol. Biol. 93:1975;255-265.
14. Igarashi Y., Kimura K., Ichimura K. K., Matsuzaki S., Ikura T., Kuwajima K., Kihara H. Solution X-ray scattering study on the chaperonin GroEL fromEscherichia coli. Biophys. Chem. 53:1995;259-266.
15. Jacrot B., Zaccai G. Determination of molecular weight by neutron scattering. Biopolymers. 20:1981;2413-2426.
16. Landry S. J., Taher A., Georgopoulos C., van der Vies S. M. Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;11622-11627.
17. Landry S. J., Zeilstra-Ryalls J., Fayet O., Georgopoulos C., Gierasch L. M. Characterisation of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature. 364:1993;255-258.
18. Langer T., Pfeifer G., Martin J., Baumeister W., Hartl F. U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 11:1992;4757.
19. Lederer H., May R. P., Kjems J. K., Schaefer W., Crespi H. L., Heumann H. Deuterium incorporation into Escherichia coli proteins: A neutron-scattering study of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Eur. J. Biochem. 156:1986;655-660.
20. Lorimer G. H. A quantitative assessment of the role of chaperonin proteins in protein foldingin vivo. FASEB J. 10:1996;5-9.
21. McLennan N. F., Girshovich A. S., Lissin N. M., Charters Y., Masters M. The strongly conserved carboxyl-terminus glycine-methionine motif of theEscherichia coliGroEL chaperonin is dispensable. Mol. Microbiol. 7:1993;49-58.
22. McLennan N. F., McAteer S., Masters M. The tail of a chaperonin: The C-terminal region ofEscherichia coliGroEL protein. Mol. Microbiol. 14:1994;309-321.
23. Miller J. H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. 1972;Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor. p. 431.
24. Moore P. B. Small-angle scattering. Information content and error analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 13:1980;168-175.
25. Pearlman, D. A. Case, D. A. Caldwell, J. W. Ross, W. S. Cheatham, T. E. DeBolt, S. Ferguson, D. Seibel, G. Singh, U. C. Weiner, P. K. Kollman, P. A. 1994, AMBER 4.1, San Francisco, CA.
26. Roseman A. M., Chen S., White H., Braig K., Saibil H. R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
27. Röβle M. Untersuchungen zur Struktur und Funktion desEscherichia coliChaperoninsystems GroEL und GroES mit Hilfe der Neutronenkleinwinkelstreuung. 1997;LMU München.
28. Sawata S., Komiyama M., Taira K. Kinetic evidence based on solvent isotope effects for the nonexistence of a proton-transfer process in reactions catalyzed by a hammerhead ribozyme: implication to the double-metal-ion mechanism of catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:1995;2357-2358.
29. Sparrer H., Rutkat K., Buchner J. Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;1096-1100.
30. Stegmann R., Manakova E., Axmann S., Röβle M., Hermann T., May R. P., Wiedenmann A., Plückthun A., Heumann H. Conformational changes and spatial arrangement of theE. colichaperones GroEL and GroES. Physica B. 234:1997;220-222.
31. Thiyagarajan P., Henderson S. J., Joachimiak A. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. Structure. 4:1996;79-88.
32. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: Implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 265:1994;659-666.
33. 7chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
34. Zahn R., Axmann S. E., Rücknagel K.-, Jaeger E., Laminet A. A., Plückthun A. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophopic binding of polypeptides by GroEL, I. GroEL recognizes the signal sequences of β-lactamase precursor. J. Mol. Biol. 242:1994;150-164.