The dark side of instruction: Teacher anger as classroom norm violations

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 76-90

  McPherson, Mary B ^a   Kearney, Patricia ^a   Plax, Timothy G ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anger expressions; Anger intensity; Emotion displays; Norm violations; Student affect; Teacher anger

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037325261     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880305376     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Afifi, W. A., & Reichert, T. (1996). Understanding the role of uncertainty in jealousy experience and expression. Communication Reports, 9, 93-117.
2. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
3. Andersen, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 49-96). New York: Academic Press.
4. Aune, K. S. (1997). Self and partner perceptions of the appropriateness of emotions. Communication Reports, 10, 133-142.
5. Aune, K. S., Buller, D. B., & Aune, R. K. (1996). Display rule development in romantic relationships: Emotion management and perceived appropriateness of emotions across relationship stages. Human Communication Research, 23, 115-145.
6. Bingham, S. G. (1991). Communication strategies for managing sexual harassment in organization: Understanding message options and their effects. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 88-115.
7. Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goal through communication action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Besley, K. R. (1999). Auger management: Immediate intervention by counselor coach. Professional School Counseling, 3, 81-90.
9. Boice, R. (1988). Faculty development via field programs for middle-aged, disillusioned faculty. Research in Higher Education, 25, 115-135.
10. Boice, R. (1996). Classroom incivilities. Research in Higher Education, 37, 453-486.
11. Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Buller, D. B., & Burgeon, J. K. (1998). Emotional expression in the deception process. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 381-402). New York: Academic Press.
13. Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129-142.
14. Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30-48.
15. Burgoon, J. K. (1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory: Vol. 19 (pp. 194-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
17. Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735-747.
18. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1990). Attribution biases and associates between conflict strategies and competence outcomes. Communication Monographs, 57, 139-151.
19. Cappella, J. N., & Green, J. D. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 89-114.
20. Cappella, J. N., & Green, J. D. (1984). The effects of distance and individual differences in arousability on nonverbal involvement: A test of discrepancy-arousal theory. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 259-286.
21. Carson, C. L, & Cupach, W. R. (2000). Fueling the flames of the green-eyed monster: The rote of ruminative thought in reaction to romantic jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 308-329.
22. Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1990). Remedial processes in embarrassing predicaments. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 13 (pp. 323-352). Newbury Park: Sage.
23. Frijda, N. H., Ortony, A., Sonnesmans, J., & Clore, G. L. (1992). The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 60-89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Guerrero, L. K. (1994). "I'm so mad I could scream:" The effects of anger expression on relational satisfaction and communication competence. The Southern Communication Journal, 59, 125-141.
25. Guerrero, L. K., & Afifi, W. A. (1998). Communicative responses to jealousy as a function of self-esteem and relationship maintenance goals: A test of Bryson's dual motivation model. Communication Reports, 11, 111-122.
26. Guerrero, L. K., & Afifi, W. A. (1999). Toward a goal-oriented approach for understanding communicative responses to jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 216-248.
27. Guerrero, L, K., Andersen, P. A., & Eloy, S. V. (1995). Coping with the green-eyed monster: Conceptualizing and measuring communicative responses to romantic jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 59, 270-304.
28. nd ed., pp. 368-381).
29. Kam, K. Y., Bondman, J. W., & Levine, T. R. (1998, February). Expecting the unusual: The effects of norm and expectation violations on the judgment of deceit. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Denver, CO.
30. Kearney, P. (1994). Affective learning. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 81-85). New York: Guilford Publications.
31. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, E. R., & Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teacher misbehaviors: What students don't like about what their teachers say and do. Communication Quarterly, 39, 309-324.
32. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Wendt-Wasco, N. J. (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college courses. Communication Quarterly, 33, 61-74.
33. LePoire, B. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: Expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory. Human Communication Research, 20, 560-591.
34. LePoire, B. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Usefulness of differentiating arousal responses within communication theories: Orienting responses or defensive arousal within nonverbal theories of expectancies violations. Communication Monographs, 63, 208-230.
35. Leseho, J., & Marshall, A. (1999). Dealing with angry students: A qualitative study with implications for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 3, 91-100.
36. Levine, T. R., Anders, L. N., Banas, J., Baum, K. L., Endo, K., Hu, A. D., & Wong, N. C. H. (2000). Norms, expectations, and deception: A norm violation model of veracity judgments. Communication Monographs, 67, 123-137.
37. McCornack, S., & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 119-138.
38. McPherson, M. B., & Kearney, P. (1993, November). Classroom embarrassment: Types, goals, and face saving strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
39. O'Donnell, R., & White, G. P. (2001). Teaching realistic consequences to the most angry and aggressive students. Middle School Journal, 32, 40-45.
40. O'Hair, H. D., & Cody, M. J. (1994). Deception. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp.181-213). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Petronio, S. (1984). Communication strategies to reduce embarrassment: Differences between men and women. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 28-38.
42. Plutchik, R., & Kellerman, H. (1989). Emotion: Theory, research and experience. New York: Harcourt Brace.
43. Russell, J. A. (1989). Measures of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion theory, research and experience: Vol. 4. The measurement of emotions (pp. 83-111). San Diego: Academic Press.
44. Sereno, K. K., Welch, M., & Braaten, D. (1987). Interpersonal conflict: Effects of variations in manner of expressing anger and justification for anger upon perceptions of appropriateness, competence, and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 15, 128-143.
45. Sharkey, W. F. (1992). Use and responses to intentional embarrassment. Communication Studies, 43, 257-275.
46. Shimanoff, S. B. (1988). Degree of emotional expressiveness as a function of face-needs, gender and interpersonal relationships. Communication Reports, 1, 43-53.
47. Sillars, A. L. (1980). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180-200.
48. Stein, N. L., & Levine, L. (1989). The causal organization of emotional knowledge: A developmental study. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 343-378.
49. Tavris, C. (1982). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50. Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1-9.
51. Thomas, C. E., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (1995). Perceptions of deception, divorce disclosures, and communication satisfaction with parents. Western Journal of Communication, 59, 228-246.
52. Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Messages that hurt. in W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 53-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Vangelisti, A. L., & Crumley, L. P. (1998). Reactions to messages that hurt: The influence of relational contexts. Communication Monographs, 65, 173.
54. Vangelisti, A. L., & Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effects of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 395-425.
55. th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.