Frequency of encounter with risk and the tradeoff between pursuit and antipredator behaviors in crayfish: A test of the risk allocation hypothesis

Ethology

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 97-106

  Pecor, K W ^a   Hazlett, B A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; CRAYFISH; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK; TEMPORAL VARIATION; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; ASTACOIDEA; CHELYDRA SERPENTINA; ORCONECTES VIRILIS; TESTUDINES;

EID: 0037322879     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00834.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abramsky, Z., Strauss, E, Subach, A., Kotler, P., & Riechman, A. 1996: The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum. Oecologia 105, 313-319.
2. Acquistapace, P., Hazlett, B. A. & Gherardi, F. Unsuccessful predation and learning of predator cues by crayfish. Behav. Ecol. (in press).
3. Chivers, D. P. & Smith, R. J. F. 1998: Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5, 338-352.
4. Ernst, C. H., Lovich, J. E., & Barbour, R. W. 1994: Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
5. Hamilton, I. M. & Heithaus, M. R. 2001: The effects of temporal variation in predation risk on antipredator behaviour: an empirical test using marine snails. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2585-2588.
6. Hazlett, B. A. 1985a: Chemical detection of sex and status in Orconectes virilis. J. Chem. Ecol. 11, 181-189.
7. Hazlett, B. A. 1985b: Disturbance pheromones in the crayfish Orconectex virilis. J. Chem. Ecol. 11, 1695-1711.
8. Hazlett, B. A. 1990: Source and nature of disturbance-chemical system in crayfish. J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 2263-2275.
9. Hazlett, B. A. 1994: Alarm responses in the crayfish Orconectes virilis and Orconectes propinquis. J. Chem. Ecol. 20, 1525-1535.
10. Hazlett, B. A. 1999: Responses to multiple chemical cues by the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Behaviour 136, 161-177.
11. Hazlett, B. A. & Schoolmaster, D. R. 1998: Responses of cambarid crayfish to predator odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 24, 1757-1770.
12. Hazlett, B. A. & McLay, C. 2000: Contingencies in the behaviour of the crab Heterozius rotundifrons. Anim. Behav. 59, 965-974.
13. Hazlett, B. A. & Rittschof, D. 2000: Predation-reproduction conflict resolution in the hermit crab, Clibanarius vittatus. Ethology 106, 811-818.
14. Kats, L. B. & Dill, L. M. 1998: The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5, 361-394.
15. Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. 1990: Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619-640.
16. Lima, S. L. & Bednekoff, P. A. 1999: Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am. Nat. 153, 649-659.
17. Madison, D. M., Maerz, J. C., & McDarby, J. H. 1999: Optimization of predator avoidance by salamanders using chemical cues: diet and diel effects. Ethology 105, 1073-1086.
18. Moore, P. A. & Grills, J. A. 1999: Chemical orientation to food by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus: influence of hydrodynamics. Anim. Behav. 58, 953-963.
19. Murray, D. L. & Jenkins, C. L. 1999: Perceived predation risk as a function of predator dietary cues in terrestrial salamanders. Anim. Behav. 57, 33-39.
20. Parmenter, R. R. 1981: Digestive turnover rates in freshwater turtles: the influence of temperature and body size. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 70, 235-238.
21. Scheiner, S. M. 2001: MANOVA. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments (Scheiner, S.M. & Gurevitch, J., eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 99-115.
22. Sih, A. & McCarthy, T. M. 2002: Prey responses to pulses of risk and safety: testing the risk allocation hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 63, 437-443.
23. Sih, A., Ziemba, R. & Harding, K. C. 2000: New insights on how temporal variation in predation risk shapes prey behavior. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 3-4.
24. Van Buskirk, J., Müller, C., Portmann, A. & Surbeck, M. 2002: A test of the risk allocation hypothesis: tadpole responses to temporal change in predation risk. Behav. Ecol. 13, 526-530.
25. Wolff, J. O. & Davis-Born, R. 1997: Response of gray-tailed voles to odours of a mustelid predator: a field test. Oikos 79, 543-548.
26. Zar, J. H. 1999: Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.