Responses of cambarid crayfish to predator odor

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1757-1770

  Hazlett, Brian A ^a   Schoolmaster, Donald R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Cambarus; Chemical cues; Crayfish; Learning; Orconectes; Predator odors; Snapping turtle

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CHEMICAL CUE; CRUSTACEAN;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY POSTURE; CRAYFISH; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; ODOR; PREDATOR; TURTLE;

CAMBARUS ROBUSTUS; CHELYDRA SERPENTINA; CHRYSEMYS PICTA; DECAPODA; ORCONECTES PROPINQUUS; ORCONECTES RUSTICUS; ORCONECTES VIRILIS;

EID: 0031762803     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022347214559     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BLAKE, M. A., and HART, P. J. B. 1993. The behavioural responses of juvenile signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus to stimuli from perch and eels. Freshwater Biol. 29:89-97.
2. BUTLER, M. J. IV, and STEIN, R. A. 1985. An analysis of replacement mechanisms governing range expansion in crayfish. Oecologia 66:168-177.
3. CAPELLI, G. M., and MUNJAL, B. L. 1982. Aggressive interactions and resource competition in relation to species displacement among crayfish of the genus Orconectes. J. Crust. Biol. 2:486-492.
4. CHIVERS, D. P., WISENDEN, B. D., and SMITH, R. J. F. 1996. Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet. Anim. Behav. 52:315-320.
5. CROCKER, D. W., and BARR, D. W. 1968. Handbook of the crayfishes of Ontario. Royal Ontario Museum Misc. Publ. 158 pp.
6. DIDONATO, G. T., and LODGE, D. M. 1993. Species replacements among Orconectes crayfishes in Wisconsin lakes: The role of predation by fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:1484-1488.
7. GARVEY, J. E., STEIN, R. A., and THOMAS, H. M. 1994. Assessing how fish predation and inter-specific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology 75:532-547.
8. HAZLETT, B. A. 1990. Source and nature of the disturbance-chemical system in crayfish. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2263-2275.
9. HAZLETT, B. A. 1994. Alarm responses in the crayfish Orconectes virilis and Orconectes propinquus. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1525-1535.
10. HAZLETT, B. A. 1996. Organisation of hermit crab behavior: Responses to multiple chemical inputs. Behaviour 133:619-642.
11. HAZLETT, B. A. 1997. The organisation of behaviour in hermit crabs: Responses to variation in stimulus strength. Behaviour 134:59-70.
12. HILL, A. M., and LODGE, D. M. 1994. Diel changes in resource demand: Competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes. Ecology 75:2118-2125.
13. HOBBS, H. H., III. 1993. Trophic relationships of North American freshwater crayfishes and shrimps. Contril. Milwaukee Pub. Mus. 85:1-110.
14. KELLER, T., and HAZLETT, B. A. 1996. Mechanical use of crayfish chelae. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 28:149-162.
15. KIESECKER, J. M., CHIVERS, D. P., and BLAUSTEIN, A. R. 1996. The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles. Anim. Behav. 52:1237-1245.
16. MATHER, M. E., and STEIN, R. A. 1993. Direct and indirect effects of fish predators on a crayfish species replacement. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:1279-1288.
17. MATHIS, A., and SMITH, R. J. F. 1993a. Chemical alarm signals increase the survival time of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during encounters with northern pike (Esox lucius). Behav. Ecol. 4:260-265.
18. MATHIS, A., and SMITH, R. J. F. 1993b. Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) learn to recognize pike (Esox lucius) as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. Anim. Behav. 46:645-656.
19. OLSEN, T. M., LODGE, D. M., CAPELLI, G. M., and HOULIHAN, R. J. 1991. Mechanisms of impact of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on littoral congeners, snails, and macrophytes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48:1853-1861.
20. QUINN, J. P., and JANSSEN, J. 1989. Crayfish competition in southwestern Lake Michigan: A predator mediated bottleneck. J. Freshwater Ecol. 5:75-85.
21. SHAVE, C. R., TOWNSEND, C. R., and CROWL, R. A. 1994. Anti-predator behaviours of a freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) to a native and an introduced predator. N.Z. J. Ecol. 18:1-10.
22. SMITH, R. J. F. 1992. Alarm signals in fishes. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 2:33-63.
23. STEIN, R. A. 1977. Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58:1237-1253.
24. TIERNEY, A. J., and DUNHAM, D. W. 1982. Chemical communication in the reproductive isolation of the crayfishes Orconectes propinquus and Orconectes virilis (Decapoda, Cambaridae). J. Crust. Biol. 2:544-548.
25. WERNER, E. E., and ANHOLT, B. 1993. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am. Nat. 142:242-272.
26. WILLMAN, E. J., HILL, A. M., and LODGE, D. M. 1994. Response of three crayfish congeners (Orconectes spp.) to odors offish carrion and live predatory fish. Am. Midi. Nat. 132:44-51.