Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 160-168

  Horn, Folkert K ^a   Nguyen, Nhung X ^a   Mardin, Christian Y ^a   Jünemann, Anselm G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DATA BASE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NERVE FIBER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETINA NERVE CELL; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037307768     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01926-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anton A., Zangwill L., Emdadi A., Weinreb R.N. Nerve fiber layer measurements with scanning laser polarimetry in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 115:1997;331-334.
2. Choplin N.T., Lundy D.C., Dreher A.W. Differentiating patients with glaucoma from glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 105:1998;2068-2076.
3. Horn F., Jonas J.B., Martus P., Mardin C.Y., Budde W.M. Polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 8:1999;353-362.
4. Casson R., James B., Rubinstein A., Ali H. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 85:2001;360-362.
5. Cello K.E., Nelson-Quigg J.M., Johnson C.A. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 129:2000;314-322.
6. Johnson C.A., Cioffi G.A., Van Buskirk E.M. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci. 76:1999;571-581.
7. Johnson C.A., Samuels S.J. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38:1997;413-425.
8. Kondo Y., Yamamoto T., Sato Y., Matsubara M., Kitazawa Y. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect. J Glaucoma. 7:1998;261-265.
9. Paczke J., Friedman D.S., Quigley H.Q., Barron Y., Vitale S. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 131:2001;188-197.
10. Quigley H.A. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 125:1998;819-829.
11. Sample P.A., Bosworth C.F., Blumenthal E.Z., Girkin C., Weinreb R.N. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 41:2000;1783-1790.
12. Wu L.L., Suzuki Y., Kunimatsu S., Araie M., Iwase A., Tomita G. Frequency doubling technology and confocal scanning opthalmoscopic optic disc analysis in open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defects. J Glaucoma. 10:2001;256-260.
13. Tyler C. Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 20:1981;204-212.
14. Korth M., Horn F., Storck B., Jonas J.B. Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 227:1989;428-435.
15. Horn F., Martus P., Korth M. Comparison of temporal and spatiotemporal contrast-sensitivity tests in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Ger J Ophthalmol. 4:1995;97-102.
16. Fabre K., Michiels I., Zeyen T. The sensitivity and specificity of TOP, FDP and GDX in screening for early glaucoma. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol. 275:2000;17-23.
17. Patel S.C., Friedman D.S., Varadkar P., Robin A.L. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 129:2000;323-327.
18. Burnstein Y., Ellish N.J., Magbalon M., Higginbotham E.J. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol. 129:2000;328-333.
19. Trible J.R., Schultz R.O., Robinson J.C., Rothe T.L. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 129:2000;740-745.
20. Chauhan B.C., Johnson C.A. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 40:1999;648-656.
21. Iester M., Capris P., Pandolfo A., Zingirian M., Traverso C.E. Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 130:2000;160-164.
22. Seguhn S., Spiegel D. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 239:2001;351-355.
23. Iester M., Mermoud A., Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma correlation with Octopus perimeter indices. Ophthalmology. 107:2000;288-294.
24. Sponsel W.E., Arango S., Trigo Y., Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 125:1998;830-836.
25. Bowd C., Zangwill L., Berry C.C., et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 42:2001;1993-2003.
26. Yamada N., Chen P.P., Mills R.P., et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 117:1999;1479-1484.
27. Brusini P., Busatto P. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma early diagnosis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 227:1998;23-24.
28. Hollo G., Szabo A., Vrgha P. Scanning laser polarimetry versus frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional threshold perimetry changes during a 12-month follow-up in preperimetric glaucoma. A pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 79:2001;403-407.
29. Cioffi G.A., Mansberger S., Spry P., Johnson C., Van Buskirk E.M. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 98:2000;195-199.
30. Khong J.J., Dimitrov P.N., Rait J., McCarty C.A. Can the specificity of the FDT for glaucoma be improved by confirming abnormal results? J Glaucoma. 10:2001;199-202.
31. Katz L.J., Henderer J.D., Ten Hulzen R.D., Spaeth G.L. A comparison of the 1% and 5% screening protocols of the frequency doubling perimeter with the Humphrey sita fast and sita standard algorithms in a glaucoma clinic population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 41:(Suppl):2000;88.
32. Adams C.W., Bullimore M.A., Wall M., Fingeret M., Johnson C.A. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 76:1999;582-587.
33. Weinreb R.N., Shakiba S., Sample P.A., et al. Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 120:1995;732-738.
34. Colen T.P., Lemij. Prevalence of split nerve fiber layer bundles in healthy eyes imaged with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 108:2001;151-156.
35. Jonas J.B., Gusek G.C., Naumann G.O.H. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intrapapillary morphometric data to visual field indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 226:1988;531-538.
36. Horn F., Hayler J., Krist D., Budde W., Korth M., Mardin C.Y. Contrast sensitivity and RNF-Polarimetry in patients with large optic disc size. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 42:(suppl):2001;131.
37. Jonas J.B., Budde W.M., Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol. 43:1999;293-320.
38. Armitage P., Berry G. Statistical methods of medical research, 3rd ed. 1994;Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
39. Weinreb R.N., Zangwill L.M., Berry C.C., Bathija R., Sample P.A. Detection of glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 116:1998;1583-1589.
40. Xu L., Chen P.P., Chen Y.Y., Takahashi Y., Wang L., Mills R.P. Quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement using scanning laser polarimetry and modulation parameters in the detection of glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 7:1998;270-277.
41. Trible J.R., Schultz R.O., James C.R., Robinson J.C., Rothe T.L. Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 117:1999;1298-1304.
42. Essock E.A., Sinai M.J., Fechtner R.D. Interocular symmetry in nerve fiber layer thickeness of normal eyes as determined by polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 8:1999;90-98.
43. Hoh S.T., Grenfield D.S., Liebmann J.M., et al. Factors affecting image acquisition during scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 29:1998;545-551.
44. Greenfield D.S., Knighton R.W., Huang X.R. Effect of corneal polarization axis on assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 129:2000;15-22.
45. Iester M., Mermoud A. Retinal nerve fiber layer and physiological central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 10:2001;158-162.
46. Kremmer S., Ayertey H.D., Selbach J.M., Steuhl K.P. Scanning laser polarimetry, retinal fiber layer photography and perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucomatous nerve fiber defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 238:2000;922-926.
47. Kogure S., Membrey W.L., Fitzke F.W., Tsukahara S. Effect of decreased retinal illumination on frequency doubling technology. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 44:2000;489-493.